Google, publishers reach book-scanning settlement

Publishers will be able to remove their books and journals from Google's Library Project

The Association of American Publishers and Google have reached a settlement to end seven years of litigation over the company's book-scanning project.

The agreement settles a copyright infringement lawsuit filed against Google in October 2005 by five AAP members. The settlement does not need court approval, Google and the AAP said in a joint news release.

The agreement "acknowledges" the rights and interests of copyright holders, the two sides said. U.S. publishers can choose to make available or choose to remove their books and journals digitized by Google for its Library Project.

The settlement shows that "digital services can provide innovative means to discover content while still respecting the rights of copyright-holders," Tom Allen, president and CEO of AAP, said in a statement.

The settlement does not affect Google's current litigation with the Authors Guild.

The agreement gives publishers who do not remove their works from the Google project the right to receive a digital copy for their use. Beyond the settlement, U.S publishers can make individual agreements with Google related to their other scanned works, the press release said.

Further terms of the agreement are confidential.

The agreement will allow Google to focus on its "core mission and work to increase the number of books available to educate, excite and entertain our users," David Drummond, Google's chief legal officer, said in a statement.

The publisher plaintiffs in the lawsuit were McGraw-Hill, Pearson Education, Penguin Group, John Wiley & Sons and Simon & Schuster.

In the Authors Guild lawsuit against Google, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted a stay in the case in September while the court reviews a judge's decision to grant class-action status to the authors.

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's e-mail address is grant_gross@idg.com.

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Struggling for Christmas presents this year? Check out our Christmas Gift Guide for some top tech suggestions and more.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Grant Gross

IDG News Service

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?