Facebook faces minimal penalties for flouting German law

Public pressure is more harmful for Facebook than the fines, a German privacy regulator said

Facebook only risks a fine of ¬20,000 (US$26,000) if it loses a dispute over its real name policy in Germany, but will be hurt more by bad publicity generated by the litigation, a German privacy regulator said on Tuesday.

The Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ULD) for Schleswig-Holstein ordered Facebook to stop enforcing its real name policy last month because it violates the German Telemedia Act that gives users the right to use nicknames online. Facebook refuses to permit pseudonyms on its platform, and it believes that is compliant with European data protection law.

The orders were issued against Facebook USA and Facebook Ireland, which is responsible for all Facebook's activities outside of the U.S. and Canada. The social network decided to dispute the orders at the Administrative Court of the State of Schleswig-Holstein around Christmas, said Harald Alberts, a spokesman for the court, on Tuesday.

The ULD is was planning to file a reply with the court this week, said Thilo Weichert, privacy commissioner and head of ULD.

After that, the court probably needs about two months to reach a preliminary verdict, Alberts said. If Facebook loses, it can appeal the case to the state's Administrative Court of Appeals. If Facebook loses the appeal, it will be ordered to stop its real name policy and the fine set by the ULD can be imposed, he added. The proceedings are complex, however, and are likely to take years, Alberts said.

Only the ULD is able to fine Facebook though, not the court, said Alberts. And in theory, Facebook could decide to pay the fine and keep enforcing its real name policy, he said, although he said he had never seen a case in which that has happened.

In that situation, though, the ULD could decide to impose another fine on Facebook with a maximum of ¬50,000, which could be disputed in court again by the social network, Weichert said. But while the threat of a fine might not concern Facebook, the company might fear having its business model ruled illegal, he said. "And that is exactly the goal of ULD," he said, adding that the best means to pressure Facebook is applying that pressure publicly.

"We know ¬20,000 is nothing for Facebook, it's just symbolic," he said. "But if we win the legal process, we are pretty sure there will be a big discussion," he said.

The fine that can be imposed is of course very minimal, said Carola Elbrecht, project manager for consumer rights in the digital world at the Federation of German Consumer Organizations, who welcomed ULD's complaint. Internet users should be able to be anonymous online, she said, adding that Facebook obviously wants to oblige its users to use real names because it can better target ads at real people and make more money by doing so.

The size of the fines that could be imposed are not that important in this case, Elbrecht said. "Facebook bleeds much more with bad publicity," she said, adding that this case is about status and image and not about money.

While Facebook could easily pay the fine and continue its real name policy if it loses the lawsuit, she predicted it would not do so because of the public pressure. "Facebook will do everything to be seen as a serious business," Elbrecht said.

It remains to be seen who is right in this case, because the disputed law is ambiguous about the use of online pseudonyms, Elbrecht said. But the contents of the ULD's complaint are good, she said.

Facebook will fight the ULD's orders vigorously because they are without merit and a waste of German taxpayers' money, a Facebook spokesman said in an email repeating the company's stance on the matter. "It is the role of individual services to determine their own policies about anonymity within the governing law," he said.

Tags securityregulationlegalCivil lawsuitsinternetgovernmentlegislationFacebookprivacy

Recommended

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Loek Essers

IDG News Service

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?