Google France loses appeal in AdWords trademark dispute

Google France has lost its appeal against a court judgment ordering it not to display targeted ads alongside searches for a French travel agent's brands.

Google's French subsidiary has lost its appeal against an October 2003 court judgment ordering it not to display advertisements alongside searches related to a French travel agent's trademarks.

The Court of Appeals in Versailles, France, ruled last Thursday that another court's earlier decision in favor of travel companies Luteciel SARL and Viaticum SA should stand. In that case, Google France SARL was ordered to pay Euro 75,000 (US$100,000) in fines and legal costs for abuse of two phrases trademarked by the companies.

Users of Google's search engine see targeted advertisements alongside their search results. Google's AdWords service allows advertisers to choose the search terms that will trigger the display of their messages -- and these terms can include the names or brands of their competitors. In this case, Luteciel and Viaticum objected to Google accepting payment from their competitors for placement of advertisements alongside search results for their trademarks "bourse des vols" and "bourse des voyages" ("flight exchange" and "trip exchange").

Luteciel and Viaticum are not the only French companies to sue Google over this practice: French luxury goods LVMH MoA«t Hennessy - Louis Vuitton SA won a similar case against Google in February. Other search engine operators have fallen foul of the same French law: In January, Yahoo's Overture sponsored search results division lost a suit brought by French hotel chain Accor over the placement of rivals' advertisements alongside search results for its hotel brands.

Google isn't ready to let the matters drop. It is still considering whether to appeal the LVMH decision, according to Google France spokeswoman Myriam Boublil.

As for the travel agency case, "We're considering an appeal of the appeal," she said.

Under French law, the practice of responding to an Internet search for one company's products with information about those of another manufacturer is considered akin to counterfeiting.

Boublil said that French law has not yet adapted to the advance of technology, leaving Internet businesses like Google operating in a gray area that legislators have not yet considered.

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Struggling for Christmas presents this year? Check out our Christmas Gift Guide for some top tech suggestions and more.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Peter Sayer

IDG News Service

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?