Apple is 'not operating a monopoly' with the App Store

Company attorney says the fact that there are no other stores peddling iOS apps doesn't mean Apple has a monopoly

Apple has been in court trying to prove that it is not operating a monopoly with the iOS App Store.

The company has asked for the judge to throw out the case because if says that the fact that there are no other stores peddling iOS apps doesn't mean it has a monopoly.

Apple attorney Dan Wall said: "There's nothing illegal about creating a system that is closed in a sense," writes Bloomberg.

Apple also claims that taking a 30% cut from developers is not a payment for distribution of their apps.

Apple's argument rests on the fact that they don't set the price for apps sold on the store.

The plaintiffs in the case claim that the fact that it is impossible to legally buy iPhone apps from anywhere but the App Store is proof that Apple is a monopolist. They also claim that the 30% charge from Apple increases prices.

Attorney Alexander Schmidt asked: "Can a consumer go somewhere else to buy Angry Birds for the iPhone? If the answer is no, then Apple is a monopolist."

The case was filed in 2011 by seven consumers. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, who is overseeing this case, is also overseeing a case where Apple is charges with maintaining a music-downloading monopoly.

Follow Karen Haslam on Twitter / Follow MacworldUK on Twitter

Related

Apple is last man standing in eBook price fixing case

Steve Jobs email to James Murdoch in, biographer's interview notes out: Apple v DOJ ebook case

Apple resellers struggling despite Apple's success

Apple claims US government sides with Amazon's monopoly in e-book case

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags mobile applicationsAppleInternet-based applications and servicesiPhoneinternetmobileiPad

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Karen Haslam

Macworld U.K.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?