Steve Jobs' draft email plays pivotal role in antitrust case

The DOJ presents a wealth of documentation, although observers wonder if such evidence is sufficient to prove collusion

Unsent email from Steve Jobs, a key piece of evidence in the U.S Department of Justice's antitrust suit against Apple

Unsent email from Steve Jobs, a key piece of evidence in the U.S Department of Justice's antitrust suit against Apple

An email composed, but never sent, by former Apple CEO Steve Jobs may prove instrumental in the Justice Department's case that Apple, along with the five largest book publishers, colluded to fix prices for electronic books.

In a draft email intended for Apple Senior Vice President Eddy Cue about negotiations with one publisher, Jobs wrote of the potential deal that "I can live with this as long as they move Amazon to the agent model too for new releases for the first year. If they don't, I'm not sure we can be competitive."

For the Justice Department, Jobs' reference to Amazon showed that the company was trying to end retail price competition among electronic book vendors. However, Orin Snyder, an attorney representing Apple in the case, dismissed the significance of the email in court, noting that it was never even sent to Cue.

As the three-week trial has started to wind down, the DOJ has released a copious set of emails and other electronic documentation between Jobs, Cue -- who was in charge of the negotiations with the book publishers -- and a number of publisher executives. Judge Denise Cote for the U.S. Southern District Court of New York is presiding over the non-jury trial.

The DOJ is piecing together the documentation in an attempt to show that Apple and the five largest book publishers colluded to raise the prices of e-books in early 2010. At the time, Amazon was offering best-selling titles for US$9.99, less than what the online retailer paid for these titles. The publishers worried that Amazon, which enjoyed a 90 percent share of the electronic book market in 2009, was lowering the value of books in consumers' eyes, as well as laying plans to cut publishers out of Amazon's book sales altogether, and to deal with authors directly.

In January 2010, the five publishers -- Hachette, HarperCollins, Macmillan, Penguin and Simon & Schuster -- all signed contracts with Apple, allowing Apple to sell electronic books in an agency model. Under such an agreement, the publishers would set the prices of electronic books, chosen from a set of pricing tiers Apple formulated. Apple got a fixed 30 percent cut of each sale through its iBookstore, which would debut on the about-to-be-launched iPad.

Immediately after the contracts took effect in April 2010, and publishers moved all their retailers to the agency model, prices of electronic books offered by both Amazon and Barnes & Noble increased by almost 20 percent, the DOJ charged.

Apple, in a court filing in May, said that the publishers in 2009 had on their own pursued a so-called agency business model before meeting with Apple. (The publishers have since settled with the DOJ.) At the time, they sold electronic books to retailers on a standard wholesale model, which left retailers the freedom to charge whatever price they saw fit.

In order to prove collusion, the DOJ has to show that Apple convinced all of the publishers as a group to move to the agency model. While the DOJ has plenty of documentation of the communications between Apple and individual publishers, it has produced less evidence that Apple coordinated actions among all the publishers. The DOJ pointed to the draft Jobs email as evidence that the company was the mastermind of this coordination.

In response, the Apple defense presented on Monday five different drafts of Jobs' email, noting four of them had no reference to moving Amazon to the agency model. Snyder argued that Jobs was in the process of refining his thoughts about the contract negotiations, and that this one draft that the DOJ highlighted was written before Jobs clarified his thoughts on the subject.

"I don't think they have a very strong case," said Ankur Kapoor, an antitrust lawyer for the law firm Constantine Cannon LLP. The new email comes closer to proving conspiracy, but still isn't close enough, Kapoor said. "It would make perfect competitive sense for Apple to want Amazon to use an agency model, because that way [Amazon] wouldn't undercut Apple's sales of e-books," Kapoor said.

"What the evidence shows is that the publishers wanted to go to an agency model anyway," Kapoor said. "If they all independently wanted to do it anyway, why would they coordinate activities?"

Kapoor also noted that the DOJ will have difficulty proving that the public was harmed in the establishment of agency pricing, even if the costs of best sellers did increase across all retail outlets once the agency contracts took effect. In the interest of making the iPad a viable electronic book reader, Apple also established price caps that limited how much electronic books could cost and mandated that publishers release all their best-selling titles in electronic form when they were released, both of which arguably benefitted the public.

"That is classic competition. And when you are talking about an innovative new product like the iPad, you are talking about the most important kind of competition," Kapoor said.

Concluding arguments will be heard on Thursday, and Judge Cote is expected to make her final ruling within several weeks.

IDG News Service executive news editor Marc Ferranti contributed to the story.


From Sluggo:


IDG News Service\New York Bureau



North America






AppletServer := @Subset(@DbName; 1); choice:=@PickList( [Custom] ; tServer : "news2003dev.nsf" ; "CompanyDocLookup" ; "Select one or more Companies..." ; "Type in the first few letters of the companie(s) you would like listed in this story." ; 1 ); FIELD Company := @Trim(@Unique(Company : choice)); @TruetServer := @Subset(@DbName; 1); choice:=@PickList( [Custom] ; tServer : "news2003dev.nsf" ; "CompanyDocLookup" ; "Select one or more Companies..." ; "Type in the first few letters of the companie(s) you would like listed in this story." ; 1 ); FIELD Company := @Trim(@Unique(Company : choice)); @True tServer := @Subset(@DbName; 1); choice:=@PickList( [Custom] ; "002570DE:00740E18" ; "CompanyDocLookup" ; "Select one or more Companies..." ; "Type in the first few letters of the companie(s) you would like listed in this story." ; 3 ); REM { Grab the CO. name, stock EXchange and stock SYMbol from the selection.}; co := @Word(choice; "~"; 1); ex := @Word(choice; "~"; 2); sym := @Word(choice; "~"; 3); ticker := @If(Sym = ""; "" ; ex + ":" + sym); FIELD Company := @Trim(@Unique(Company : co)); FIELD StoryTickerSymbols := @Trim(@Unique(StoryTickerSymbols : ticker)); REM {Store the complete value set in it's own field}; FIELD StoryTickerStrings := @Trim(@Unique(StoryTickerStrings : choice)); @True Edit


Story Size:

967 words



Posted at:

06/03/2013 05:52:16 PM GMT GMT

06/03/2013 05:52:16 PM GMT

Display(web) GMT Posted Time:

zone := @Zone(GMTPostedOn); dst := @If(@Modulo(zone; 1) > 0; 1; 0); gmtoffset := @Round(zone); gmtoffset := gmtoffset + dst; storyPostedTime:=@Adjust(GMTPostedOn;0;0;0;gmtoffset ;0;0); storyPostedText := @Text(storyPostedTime; "Z2"); REM { string should look like 05/02/2006 12:07:32 AM GMT}; offset := @Length(@Left(storyPostedText; "M")) - @Length(@Left(storyPostedText; " ")); REM {timeOnly := @Text(GMTPostedOn; "S1")}; REM {timeOnly := @Trim(@Middle(storyPostedText; " "; offset))}; timeonly := @Word(storyPostedText; " "; 2); timeAMPM := @Word(storyPostedText; " "; 3); timeHours := @Word(timeonly; ":"; 1); timeMinsSecs := @Right(timeonly; ":"); hours24 := @TextToNumber(timeHours) + @If(((timeAMPM="PM") & (timeHours!="12")) | ((timeAMPM="AM") & (timeHours="12")); 12; 0); postedtime:=@If(hours24=24;"0";"") + @If(hours24<10;"0";"") + @Text(@If(hours24=24; 0; hours24)) + ":" + timeMinsSecs +"&nbsp;GMT"; mypostedtime:=@Left(postedtime;5) ; posteddate:=@Text(@Day(storyPostedTime)) + "&nbsp;" + @Select(@Month(storyPostedTime); "Jan"; "Feb"; "Mar"; "Apr"; "May"; "Jun"; "Jul"; "Aug"; "Sep"; "Oct"; "Nov"; "Dec") ; posteddate + " " +mypostedtime + " GMT"

Desk edit by:

Nancy Weil

Copy edit by:

Nancy Weil

Premium Content:


Translated by:

None, None

Audit Trail:

@Implode(AuditTrail; @NewLine + @NewLine)


Homepage Ranking:


Related Media:

Image Exists:

Linked Images:

Primary Image:

Video Exists:

Embedded Media...



Embed Code:

Agents tagging:

Mail and/or FTP:


Alert Sent:

News Service Alert Sent:


Advisory Alert Sent:


Push to External Synd.:

Pushed at:

Extract names:

Homepage Image HTML

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Appleantitrustconsumer electronicshardware systemslegaltabletse-readersiPad

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Joab Jackson

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles


PCW Evaluation Team

Azadeh Williams

HP OfficeJet Pro 8730

A smarter way to print for busy small business owners, combining speedy printing with scanning and copying, making it easier to produce high quality documents and images at a touch of a button.

Andrew Grant

HP OfficeJet Pro 8730

I've had a multifunction printer in the office going on 10 years now. It was a neat bit of kit back in the day -- print, copy, scan, fax -- when printing over WiFi felt a bit like magic. It’s seen better days though and an upgrade’s well overdue. This HP OfficeJet Pro 8730 looks like it ticks all the same boxes: print, copy, scan, and fax. (Really? Does anyone fax anything any more? I guess it's good to know the facility’s there, just in case.) Printing over WiFi is more-or- less standard these days.

Ed Dawson

HP OfficeJet Pro 8730

As a freelance writer who is always on the go, I like my technology to be both efficient and effective so I can do my job well. The HP OfficeJet Pro 8730 Inkjet Printer ticks all the boxes in terms of form factor, performance and user interface.

Michael Hargreaves

Windows 10 for Business / Dell XPS 13

I’d happily recommend this touchscreen laptop and Windows 10 as a great way to get serious work done at a desk or on the road.

Aysha Strobbe

Windows 10 / HP Spectre x360

Ultimately, I think the Windows 10 environment is excellent for me as it caters for so many different uses. The inclusion of the Xbox app is also great for when you need some downtime too!

Mark Escubio

Windows 10 / Lenovo Yoga 910

For me, the Xbox Play Anywhere is a great new feature as it allows you to play your current Xbox games with higher resolutions and better graphics without forking out extra cash for another copy. Although available titles are still scarce, but I’m sure it will grow in time.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?