Huge damage award at stake as Apple, Samsung return to court next week

Judge ordered partial retrial to recalculate damages applied to Samsung infringement

The battle between Apple and Samsung over smartphone design returns to a Silicon Valley courtroom next week as the companies fight over how much Samsung should pay for infringement of five Apple patents in 13 of its smartphones.

It was just over a year ago that a jury in the same court awarded Apple US$1.05 billion in damages after finding infringement of Apple's patents in numerous Samsung smartphones. But Judge Lucy Koh cut about $450 million from the total award and ordered a partial retrial after finding the jury had used an "impermissible legal theory" in determining the amount.

The case centers on two types of patents and the jury should have used a different formula in calculating the amount owed to Apple by Samsung for infringement of each type of patent, but it didn't consistently do that, Koh said.

She also faulted Apple for misstating the date on which it notified Samsung about the infringement. As a result, some of the damages were too high, Koh said.

"[I]t was Apple's strategic decision to submit an expert report using an aggressive notice date for all of the patents. The need for a new trial could have been avoided had Apple chosen a more circumspect strategy or provided more evidence to allow the jury or the Court to determine the appropriate award for a shorter notice period," she wrote at the time.

On Nov. 12 in a District Court in San Jose courtroom, the two sides will begin selecting a jury. The trial will begin immediately after the jury selection.

The patent infringement will not be reconsidered; neither will the roughly $600 million [m] in damages that Koh didn't strike down.

"Your sole job in this trial is to determine the amount of damages to be awarded to Apple for Samsung's infringement of these patents," Judge Koh will tell jurors when their selection is complete, according to prepared jury instructions.

The case is 11-01846 at the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in San Jose

Martyn Williams covers mobile telecoms, Silicon Valley and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Follow Martyn on Twitter at @martyn_williams. Martyn's e-mail address is martyn_williams@idg.com

Tags samsungAppleconsumer electronicslegalCivil lawsuitssmartphones

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Martyn Williams

IDG News Service

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?