Salesforce.com will do 'full review' of hackathon after controversy, Benioff says

Some critics have cried foul over the contest's US$1 million award to winner Upshot

Salesforce.com has come under fire from critics who say the "hackathon" it held at last week's Dreamforce conference was judged unfairly, and CEO Marc Benioff is now promising a thorough investigation.

"We are doing a full review of the Hackathon," Benioff said in a Twitter message. "We always respond to feedback, and this will be no different. It must be a legitimate victory."

Contestants in the hackathon competed to make a mobile application using Salesforce.com's technology. The top US$1 million prize went to Upshot, which developed an application that allows users to create and edit Salesforce.com reports from mobile devices.

The official rules for the hackathon allowed coding to begin on an application as of Oct. 25, when the contest was announced. Eligible applications also had to be "developed solely as part of this Hackathon," the rules state.

But after Upshot was announced as the winner, other contestants quickly voiced complaints online. For one thing, it appeared that Upshot's CTO Thomas Kim had demoed a similar-sounding application a couple of weeks before Oct. 25.

Posters also complained that Kim is a former Salesforce.com employee, although it doesn't appear his participation was actually in violation of the contest rules. He couldn't be reached for comment Monday.

Other posters identifying themselves as hackathon participants said their entries didn't receive any evaluation from judges.

"We've seen questions about why the winning team was allowed to submit an app that may have used pre-existing code, how the judging worked, and the eligibility of participants," said Adam Seligman, vice president of developer marketing, in a blog post. "While we are conducting a thorough review of the final entries to ensure they complied with published rules and regulations, we wanted to address some of those concerns here."

The language in the rules denoting that applications must be "developed solely" for the Hackathon didn't tell the whole story, Seligman added.

"We expected and encouraged teams to take advantage of existing APIs and services they've written to create a great mobile app," he wrote. "For example, any Salesforce customer or developer is likely to have a whole set of existing customizations and logic that can be exposed to their mobile app via REST API."

Seligman pointed to a thread on Salesforce.com's message board for developers, in which an administrator provided additional information.

"Reusing code you may have written before is fine, provided that you were the author of that code, it doesn't comprise the majority of your app and its use does not violate any third party's rights," states a post dated Nov. 14, prior to the hackathon. "You could modify an existing product to integrate with Salesforce and submit that, however you'd be judged on just that component, not the pre-existing product."

Salesforce.com also put together a team of more than 80 judges, which reviewed every eligible entry "at least twice," Seligman added.

The company will post the results of its review online once it is complete, according to Seligman.

Chris Kanaracus covers enterprise software and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Chris' email address is Chris_Kanaracus@idg.com

Tags Internet-based applications and servicesSalesforce.comCIO roleinternetDREAMFORCEcloud computingUpshotIT management

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Chris Kanaracus

IDG News Service

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?