Yahoo email anti-spoofing policy breaks mailing lists

Yahoo moved to a more aggressive DMARC policy that creates email delivery issues on mailing lists for users, email experts said

In an attempt to block email spoofing attacks on addresses, Yahoo began imposing a stricter email validation policy that unfortunately breaks the usual workflow on legitimate mailing lists.

The problem is a new DMARC (Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting and Conformance) "reject" policy advertised by Yahoo to third-party email servers, said John Levine, a long-time email infrastructure consultant and president of the Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial Email (CAUCE), in a message sent to the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) mailing list Monday.

DMARC is a technical specification for implementing the SPF (Sender Policy Framework) and DKIM (DomainKeys Identified Mail) email validation and authentication mechanisms. These technologies were designed to prevent email address spoofing commonly used in spam and phishing attacks.

The goal of DMARC is to achieve a uniform implementation of SPF and DKIM among the top email service providers and other companies that want to benefit from email validation.

The specification introduces the concept of aligned identifiers, which requires the SPF or DKIM validation domains to be the same as or sub-domains of the domain for the email address in the "from" field. The domain owners can use a DMARC policy setting called "p=" to tell receiving email servers what should happen if the DMARC check fails. The possible values for this setting can be "none" or "reject."

Over the weekend Yahoo published a DMARC record with "p=reject" essentially telling all receiving email servers to reject emails from addresses that don't originate from its servers, Levine said.

While this is a good thing from an anti-spoofing perspective, it raises problems for legitimate mailing lists, according to the email expert.

"Lists invariably use their own bounce address in their own domain, so the SPF doesn't match," Levine said. "Lists generally modify messages via subject tags, body footers, attachment stripping, and other useful features that break the DKIM signature. So on even the most legitimate list mail like, say, the IETF's, most of the mail fails the DMARC assertions, not due to the lists doing anything 'wrong'."

With the new policy, when a Yahoo user sends an email to a mailing list, the list's server distributes that message to all subscribers, changing the headers and breaking DMARC validation. List subscribers with email accounts on servers that perform DMARC checks, such as Gmail, Hotmail (, Comcast or Yahoo itself, will reject the original message and respond back to the list with automated DMARC error messages.

For example, Gmail will respond with a message that reads: "smtp;550 5.7.1 Unauthenticated email from is not accepted due to domain's DMARC policy. Please contact administrator of domain if this was a legitimate mail."

So users of Gmail, Hotmail and other DMARC-enabled providers will not only fail to receive messages sent to the mailing list by Yahoo users, but will flood the list with bounce messages, risking to be bounced off the list themselves, Levine said.

The email expert recommended that mailing list operators suspend the list posting rights of users and ask them to re-subscribe to their lists with accounts from different email providers.

Yahoo did not immediately respond to an inquiry seeking clarification on whether its new DMARC policy is permanent or temporary.

A test of Yahoo's DMARC records Tuesday done with a tool on revealed that the "p=reject" setting was still in place for the domain. By comparison, had a policy record of "p=none," meaning it doesn't tell other email servers how to handle messages from addresses that fail DMARC checks.

Laura Tessmer Atkins, co-founder of email anti-spam consultancy firm Word to the Wise based in Palo Alto, California, also confirmed and documented the issue in a blog post Monday. She believes that Yahoo began advertising a "reject" policy because of a recent attack against Yahoo users that involved attackers compromising email accounts and sending unauthorized emails to their contacts.

"The attackers have modified their attacks and are now sending mail from Yahoo users to their contacts through other servers," Atkins said. "By publishing a p=reject record, Yahoo is telling other systems to not accept mail from Yahoo users if it doesn't come through Yahoo controlled servers. This includes the mail from the attackers, but also mail from regular Yahoo users that use another SMTP server, including bulk mail sent through ESPs [email service providers], and individual mail sent to mailing lists.", the industry group that oversees the development and adoption of the DMARC standard, did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the Yahoo situation. However, the frequently asked questions section of the group's website acknowledges the interoperability problems mailing lists can have with DMARC and offers some recommendations.

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Internet Engineering Task ForceWord to the WiseInternet-based applications and servicesantispamonline safetysecurityMailinternetCompliance monitoringYahoo

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Lucian Constantin

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Cool Tech

ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q – Reign beyond virtual world

Learn more >

D-Link PowerLine AV2 2000 Gigabit Network Kit

Learn more >

D-Link TAIPAN AC3200 Ultra Wi-Fi Modem Router (DSL-4320L)

Learn more >

Lexar® Professional 1000x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Crucial® BX200 SATA 2.5” 7mm (with 9.5mm adapter) Internal Solid State Drive

Learn more >

Gadgets & Things


Learn more >

Lexar Professional 2000x SDHC™/SDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Lexar® Professional 1000x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Family Friendly

Lexar Professional 2000x SDHC™/SDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Lexar® Professional 1000x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

ASUS VivoPC VM62 - Incredibly Powerful, Unbelievably Small

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Lexar Professional 2000x SDHC™/SDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Lexar® Professional 1000x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Best Deals on PC World

Latest News Articles


GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy


First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni


For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell


The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi


The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott


My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.


Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?