Google had secret pact with Samsung over some Apple patent claims

Google took over the defense of some of Samsung's case and agreed to cover some costs

Google agreed to take over some of Samsung's defense against patent claims brought by Apple under a secret agreement reached in 2012, a federal court jury heard Tuesday.

The pact between Google and Samsung was revealed in a video-taped deposition played to the eight-person jury hearing Apple's patent infringement case against the Korean firm, in which the iPhone maker is seeking more than US$2 billion in damages.

In the video, Google counsel James Maccoun is shown a series of emails between Google and Samsung in which the agreement was hammered out.

In the emails, Google offers to indemnify Samsung against two Apple patents as they relate to the Android search box, and a third Apple patent as it relates to Google's Gmail app, according to Maccoun's testimony.

The indemnification meant Google would assume responsibility for Samsung's defense if Apple brought claims against the company over those patents. While details of the agreement weren't disclosed, indemnification typically also involves a party agreeing to cover costs and damages for that part of a trial.

The patents in question were U.S. 6,847,959 and 8,086,604, which related to the Android search box, and U.S. Patent 7,761,414, which related to the Gmail app.

Samsung had been arguing that some of Apple's claims should be disregarded by the jury because they related to software developed by Google. By playing the video, Apple was trying to show the jury that the companies had been working together to defend against those patents.

The indemnification pact appears to have stemmed from a mobile application development agreement between Google and Samsung.

Throughout the deposition video, which was filmed on Aug. 16 last year, Maccoun is seen reclining in his chair. His body language suggests he had little enthusiasm for being there.

The video was shown in the final moments of Apple's arguing its case against Samsung. Both sides were given 25 hours by Judge Lucy Koh and both are expected to use their time up Tuesday afternoon.

The court will sit again on Friday, when the lawyers are expected to argue legal points of the case away from the jury. The jury will be brought back for closing arguments, which are currently expected on Monday, April 28, and will begin its deliberations immediately afterward.

Martyn Williams covers mobile telecoms, Silicon Valley and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Follow Martyn on Twitter at @martyn_williams. Martyn's e-mail address is martyn_williams@idg.com

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags consumer electronicsintellectual propertyAndroidlegaliPhoneCivil lawsuitsSamsung ElectronicspatentsmartphonesApple

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Martyn Williams

IDG News Service

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?