Oracle wants an illegal monopoly on Solaris support, company alleges

Oracle has sued Terix and Maintech, saying they provide support for the OS in an illegal fashion

An independent Solaris OS support provider has countersued Oracle for unfair competition and violation of U.S. antitrust laws.

Oracle had sued Terix as well as another company, Maintech, in July 2013, saying they "engaged in a deliberate scheme to misappropriate and distribute copyrighted, proprietary Oracle software code" in the course of providing Solaris support services.

Terix denied wrongdoing at the time but goes further in its countersuit, which was filed earlier this month in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Since acquiring Sun Microsystems in 2010, "Oracle has pursued a deliberate policy of attempting to eliminate competition in the market for the maintenance and support of computer hardware running the Solaris operating system," the filing states. This amounts to "an illegal effort to monopolize those markets and to obtain supracompetitive profits from the support customers who are being denied the benefits of choice and competition."

Oracle wants to force customers to use its support services even when they could get superior services from third parties such as Terix "at a significantly lower cost," the filing adds.

Prior to the Oracle acquisition, Sun "routinely" allowed hardware customers and third-party support providers to "obtain Solaris Updates and Sun/Oracle Firmware promptly upon release for free or a reasonable and fair cost," the filing says.

But "Oracle turned off access to the free Solaris Firmware repository in Summer 2011, and now refuses to allow customers to obtain Sun/Oracle Firmware unless they also purchase Solaris Updates and Solaris Software Support Services from Oracle," the filing states.

An Oracle spokeswoman declined to comment on Monday.

A judge tossed out part of Oracle's lawsuit in January, saying Terix and Maintech hadn't engaged in software trafficking, but upheld other claims such as copyright infringement and false advertisement.

Oracle has struggled to expand its hardware business since buying Sun, and is undoubtedly loath to see money for support services go to third parties and not its own coffers.

It has also sued Rimini Street, which provides third-party support for Oracle and SAP applications. Rimini Street has also filed counterclaims against Oracle that take a similar approach to Terix's filing.

Chris Kanaracus covers enterprise software and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Chris' email address is Chris_Kanaracus@idg.com

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags unixTerixSun MicrosystemsCivil lawsuitsMaintechoperating systemsRimini StreetOracleservicesintellectual propertylegalSAPsoftwareApplication services

Struggling for Christmas presents this year? Check out our Christmas Gift Guide for some top tech suggestions and more.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Chris Kanaracus

IDG News Service

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?