Google hit with new anticompetition complaint in EU

Digital groups team up to file yet another complaint against the search giant

Google is abusing its dominate market position to promote its own services and stifle competition, alleges a new complaint filed against the company with the European Commission.

The Open Internet Project (OIP), which represents 400 EU startups, online publishers, consumer associations and digital rights groups, filed the complaint, which the Commission confirmed Thursday. The Commission said it will look into the complaint and examine it carefully before deciding whether an investigation is warranted.

Meanwhile, Google seems to have finally resolved a similar antitrust case with the Commission. EU Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia said Thursday that he is satisfied the search giant had come up with acceptable remedies to the previous complaints.

Google has been under investigation by the Commission since November 2010 after competitors accused it of directing users to its own services by reducing the visibility of competing websites and services in search results.

The investigation had four main areas of concern: that Google directed users to its own services by reducing the visibility of competing websites and services; content scraping; contractual restrictions preventing advertisers from moving their online campaigns to rival search engines; and exclusivity deals with advertisers.

To alleviate the first concern, Google proposed to present three rival links for each query. These will be separated from Google's services and will be clearly labeled. It will also be indicated when Google promotes its own services.

Google has also agreed to allow content providers to opt-out of having their content used without it affecting search or AdWords. Google will also for five years remove all exclusivity obligations from advertising contracts and will make the portability of online advertising campaigns easier.

"These concessions would give a real opportunity to Google's rivals to attract users," Almunia said. "It would then be for users to choose the service they want to click on. These decisions are up to informed users, not to competition authorities."

"One principle must be clearly understood: The role of competition policy is not to prevent Google from innovating and offering new services. This would not be in the best interest of users. Our role is to ensure that Google does not prevent competitors from doing the same," he said.

However, the OIP says the remedies do not go far enough. "The European Commission is planning to give in to the giant by concluding a settlement largely behind closed doors that would in principle legalize Google's self-preference," the group said in a statement.

The OIP wants the Commission to impose stricter penalties on Google. But given that the case is similar to the one Almunia has just closed, he may be unwilling to revisit old arguments.

Follow Jennifer on Twitter at @BrusselsGeek or email tips and comments to jennifer_baker@idg.com.

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags antitrustGoogleregulationlegalinternetgovernmentsearch engines

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Jennifer Baker

IDG News Service

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?