No bouncing back to old gallery interface for Samsung in the Netherlands

Old and new infringing Samsung devices cannot be sold in the Netherlands

Samsung won't be able to reintroduce a bounce-back photo gallery feature in the Netherlands after a Dutch court banned the sale of all current and future devices infringing an Apple patent.

In its decision on Tuesday, the Court of Appeals in The Hague upheld a 2012 sales ban on Galaxy products that run Android 2.2.1 through 2.3.7 and that don't use Samsung's new proprietary photo gallery software, according to the verdict shared with the IDG News Service by Apple.

The 2012 ruling found that the Galaxy S, SII and Ace infringed on Apple's bounce-back patent, which describes a feature in which a user who scrolls beyond the edge of a zoomed-in photo sees a glimpse of the next one, after which the initial photo bounces back.

The appeals court however broadened the scope of the ban, now includes all current and future infringing Samsung devices. The broadened sales ban will have little impact though, since Android versions 3.0 and higher don't infringe on the patent.

Samsung also stopped delivering infringing products to clients as of the end of August 2011 when it introduced a work-around for the infringing phones. This happened shortly after the The Hague District Court banned the sales of the Galaxy S, SII and Ace in Europe in the first preliminary ruling in this case. Samsung's work-around introduced a blue flash to the photo gallery that illuminates the edge of an image when the user tries to scroll.

The court of appeals also limited the sales ban to the Netherlands, overturning a broader injunction on sales of infringing devices elsewhere in Europe.

Germany's Federal Patent Court invalidated the bounce-back patent in September last year because Steve Jobs showed how the technology worked during a keynote months before the company applied for the patent in Europe, the Court of Appeals in The Hague noted. It is therefore likely that the patent will also be found invalid by judges in other European countries, the court said, adding that it will therefore not allow any cross-border sales bans.

Samsung did not immediately reply to a request for comment.

Loek is Amsterdam Correspondent and covers online privacy, intellectual property, open-source and online payment issues for the IDG News Service. Follow him on Twitter at @loekessers or email tips and comments to

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Appleconsumer electronicsintellectual propertypatentSamsung ElectronicslegalAndroidsmartphones

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Loek Essers

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Deals on PC World

Deals on PC World

Latest News Articles


GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy


First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni


For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell


The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi


The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott


My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.


Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?