Appeals court denies Apple bid to delay e-books damages trial

An appeals court denied Apple's request for a stay during appeal

The trial for damages in the e-books price-fixing lawsuit against Apple is to proceed on July 14 after an appeals court declined to stay it.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit ruled Thursday that Apple did not qualify for a stay during appeal on proceedings in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, where the case is scheduled to go on trial to determine damages. A temporary stay entered by the appeals court last month was ended.

U.S. District Judge Denise Cote of the New York court ruled last year that Apple and five major U.S. publishers had conspired to raise prices in the e-book market to counter Amazon.com.((

The U.S. Department of Justice, 33 states and U.S. territories and a group of consumers claiming class status brought lawsuits charging that Apple and the publishers conspired to raise e-book prices in 2010. All of the book publishers settled before a trial on liability that was held in June 2013.

At the hearing in July, the states and the class are scheduled to try their damages claims against Apple. Judge Cote earlier granted class certification to the consumer group as well as denied an Apple plea that the states lack standing or should be asked to seek class certification before seeking to recover damages from Apple due to its antitrust violations.

In its appeal, Apple has held that it had no knowledge that publishers were engaged in a conspiracy in December 2009 or at any other point. Apple had offered a retail business model to the publishers that was in the company's independent business interests "and was attractive to the publishers, who were frustrated with Amazon," it said in a filing in February.

Apple could not be immediately reached for comment on the decision by the appeals court.

On Thursday, Judge Cote ordered the parties to confer and inform her on the schedule going forward for the proceedings, in view of the appeals court order.

John Ribeiro covers outsourcing and general technology breaking news from India for The IDG News Service. Follow John on Twitter at @Johnribeiro. John's e-mail address is john_ribeiro@idg.com

Tags AppleantitrustInternet-based applications and serviceslegalinternet

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

John Ribeiro

IDG News Service

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?