Rimini Street did steal Oracle's intellectual property, judge says

The third-part support company had claimed defamation, but a federal judge found Oracle's accusations were true

A federal judge has dismissed a defamation claim against Oracle by third-party support vendor Rimini Street, saying Oracle was telling the truth when it accused the company of "massive theft" of its software.

"It is undisputed that Rimini engaged in theft of Oracle's intellectual property by repeatedly making multiple copies of Oracle's copyrighted Enterprise Software programs to support its software support service clients," Judge Larry Hicks wrote in a ruling filed on Tuesday in a federal district court in Nevada.

Rimini is defending itself against an Oracle suit claiming it stole Oracle's intellectual property. This week's ruling is a major setback for the third-party support provider.

Also in Tuesday's ruling, Hicks found that Rimini Street had committed copyright infringement with respect to Oracle's database software. Earlier this year, he had determined that Rimini Street violated copyrights on Oracle's PeopleSoft application.

In his latest ruling, Hicks dismissed a number of defenses and counterclaims that Rimini Street had made against Oracle, including that Oracle had made defamatory statements to the media in order to hurt Rimini's business.

"Truth is an absolute defense to defamation," Hicks wrote. An Oracle spokeswoman's statement "that Rimini engaged in 'massive theft' of Oracle's intellectual property" is truthful, he added.

No trial date has been set for the case. A Rimini Street spokesman couldn't immediately provide comment Thursday on Hicks' latest ruling.

Rimini Street provides support for SAP and Oracle software customers who no longer wish to pay for vendor-provided maintenance, offering a 50 percent discount on their current support bills. These customers tend to have well-stabilized implementations and no desire to apply the continual upgrades provided under a vendor support contract.

The company's CEO, Seth Ravin, was a co-founder of TomorrowNow, a former SAP subsidiary that offered similar services to Oracle customers. Oracle sued SAP in 2007 over TomorrowNow's business practices, saying they infringed on its copyrights. It subsequently won a sizable judgment after SAP admitted liability, although the matter is not yet concluded.

Oracle then sued Rimini Street in 2010, saying Ravin had duplicated TomorrowNow's "corrupt business model."

Industry observers expect the Oracle lawsuit's outcome will help lay out concrete ground rules for how companies can perform third-party software support legally. Right now, the market is quite limited, with just Rimini and a handful of other small companies in business.

Oracle, like other enterprise software companies, derives a large chunk of its revenue and profit from the annual maintenance fees customers pay for vendor support, and is loath to see those money streams diminished by third-party competitors.

Despite the specter of litigation, Rimini has experienced rapid growth.

Revenue for the quarter ended June 30 rose 37 percent to US$20.4 million, while the number of active support clients jumped 30 percent to 574, according to Rimini Street.

Chris Kanaracus covers enterprise software and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Chris' email address is Chris_Kanaracus@idg.com

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags intellectual propertylegalCivil lawsuitsCIO roleSAPit strategysoftwareIT managementRimini StreetOracleservices

Struggling for Christmas presents this year? Check out our Christmas Gift Guide for some top tech suggestions and more.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Chris Kanaracus

IDG News Service

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?