Google's foes have four weeks to comment on EU antitrust charges

The European Commission has sent complainants a redacted version of the antitrust charges it intends to bring against Google

The entrance of the European Commission headquarters in Brussels on June 17, 2015

The entrance of the European Commission headquarters in Brussels on June 17, 2015

The European Commission is almost ready to file final antitrust charges against Google: It has shared a redacted copy of charges with complainants and given them four weeks to provide additional evidence and comments.

The Commission charged Google in April with abusing its dominant market position as a search provider in Europe. It said Google systematically favored its own comparison shopping product over competing services, a practice that infringes on European Union antitrust rules because it stifles competition and hurts consumers.

The antitrust investigation began in 2010, triggered by complaints from organizations that now include Microsoft, Foundem, Yelp and European consumer group BEUC.

On Thursday, the Commission sent the complainants a heavily redacted version of the Statement of Objections it sent Google in April, according to a person who works for one of the complainants. He spoke on the condition of anonymity because the Commission has imposed strict confidentiality clauses around the document shared with the complainants, the person said, adding that complainants will have four weeks to give their views on the charges and send extra evidence.

The European Commission declined to comment on the ongoing investigation. There is no timetable for the Commission to decide on antitrust investigations since these depend on a number of factors, including the complexity of the case, a Commission official said.

Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The company could be fined up to 10 percent of its annual revenue.

The Commission is not just concerned about Google's search services. At the same time it informed Google of those charges, it also launched a separate antitrust probe focusing on the company's bundling of its apps with the Android OS.

Loek is Amsterdam Correspondent and covers online privacy, intellectual property, online payment issues as well as EU technology policy and regulation for the IDG News Service. Follow him on Twitter at @loekessers or email tips and comments to

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags antitrustGoogleeuropean commissionlegal

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Loek Essers

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles


GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy


First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni


For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell


The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi


The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott


My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?