Lab test finds new Galaxy phones water resistant, but not waterproof

Overall ratings from SquareTrade still put the iPhone 6S Plus at a higher risk of breaking due to an accident

Galaxy S7 Edge's water-resistant feature.
Credit: Samsung

Galaxy S7 Edge's water-resistant feature. Credit: Samsung

Both the new Samsung Galaxy S7 and S7 Edge are advertised as water resistant, but they aren't waterproof, as a 30-minute dunk test proved.

SquareTrade Labs tested both phones in a Deep Water DunkBot and found that both mostly survived after 30 minutes under five feet of water, but their audio was left permanently muffled and distorted as a result.

SquareTrade, which sells smartphone warranty plans, posted a video of its testing. In it, the company notes that Samsung's claim is that both phones are "water resistant in up to five feet of water for up to 30 minutes" (emphasis added).

As with most things technical, the testing is not without controversy. Samsung's most recent online claim is not water resistance in up to five feet of water, as SquareTrade tested, and instead is less, for up to 30 minutes in 1 meter of water -- or about three feet, 3 inches' worth.

SquareTrade was apparently relying on some claims made by Samsung partners that used the five-foot water depth. Verizon, for example, has the two Samsung phones as being "water resistant in up to 5 feet of water for up to 30 minutes" in its product footnotes.

Samsung itself rates the water-resistance feature at IP68, which is an industry term for the International Protection code (sometimes termed the Ingress Protection mark). The "6" in the code means it is "dust tight" while the "8" means the device is suitable for continuous immersion beyond 1 meter under conditions specified by the manufacturer.

However a smartphone user regards the Square Trade test, it is obvious the lab wants to compare similar smartphones and not provide anybody with a legal defense against Samsung's claims. The lab found that Apple's latest devices fared worse than Samsung's new devices in the dunk test, as expected, since they are not advertised as water resistant.

The iPhone 6S lost all audio in the lab's 30-minute water dunk test and suffered water damage under the screen. The larger iPhone 6S Plus began malfunctioning at 10 minutes under water and was rendered a brick at 24 minutes, according to SquareTrade.

However, SquareTrade did find the iPhone 6S survived its 30-second TumbleBot test nearly unscathed, while the S7 and S7 Edge suffered significant damage to their back panels. The iPhone 6S Plus's screen was completely shattered. The TumbleBot rotates at 50 revolutions per minute, continually dropping a device inside a drum.

When dropped on their corners from six feet high, the S7 cracked after four falls, while the S7 Edge was rendered unusable after seven drops. Facedown drops proved worse, with the S7 shattered on the first fall, and the S7 Edge shattered on the second.

When put under bending pressure, the S7 Edge cracked at 110 pounds of pressure. Both the S7 and iPhone 6S withstood 160 pounds of pressure.

SquareTrade also assigns new smartphones a "breakability score" from 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest risk of breaking due to an accident. For both Samsung phones and the latest iPhones, all four are listed at "medium risk" of breaking due to an accident.

Numerically, the iPhone 6S has the lowest risk, at 4, while the Galaxy S7 came in at 5. Next higher, the S7 Edge came in at 6 and the iPhone 6S Plus came in at the highest risk of breaking due to an accent, at 6.5.

In an in-depth review for Computerworld, Dan Rosenbaum dropped the Edge in a sink of water for a minute or two, and found it did fine.

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags samsung

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Matt Hamblen

Computerworld (US)
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles


GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy


First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni


For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell


The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi


The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott


My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?