LastPass: how to securely patch the world's most popular password manager

Researchers are looking more closely at LastPass. Patching plug-ins needs care and attention

Researchers recently reported finding two separate and serious vulnerabilities in the market-leading browser password manager LastPass. Although widely seen as a consumer product, the platform is also offered to businesses in the form of LastPass Enterprise.

The first was reported by Mathias Karlsson of Detectify Labs relates to the software's autofill feature which he discovered could be fooled into thinking it was interacting with a site when it was in fact somewhere else. The flaw was reported and subsequently fixed a year ago which earned Karlsson a $1,000 bounty.

The second, discovered only this week by a Google researcher Tavis Ormandy, who described it as a "complete remote compromise" in a fairly detailed submission.

There is nothing unusual in any of this - security problems are found in a wide range of software these days - although as an online password database there was understandable anxiety that two could apparently materialise in a single week. In both cases, the company jumped on the issues seems to have done its best to fix them.

Complicating things slightly is the fact that after years of independent development, the potentially more serious of the latest LastPass flaws (that disclosed by Ormandy) emerged in version 4.x of the password manager released in the months after the firm was bought by LogMeIn in October 2015.

LastPass: who is affected and is there a patch?

The immediate question is how users update their LastPass plug-ins to reflect fixes that might have been released by the firm.

- The Karlsson flaw was fixed over a year ago in version 3.x and would not have been an issue for anyone using one of the various LastPass multi-factor options which are available to all Premium ($12 per annum) users. This issue is now closed.

- The Ormandy flaw affects only Mozilla Firefox running version 4.x, first released as a beta in January 2016, and fixed last week in v4.1.21a, an alpha release.

This brings us to an interesting aspect of LastPass - the plug-in itself is available in two separate versions, the original version 3.x and the more recent and overhauled version 4.x.

Single users who download LastPass from the LastPass website are served v4.1.20 as a universal Windows installer if they are running Mozilla, Chrome, Edge and Safari plug-ins. But Mozilla users who encounter it first in the Add-on Mozilla Store (AMO) are served version 3.3.1 by default with the option to download 4.x as a beta.

This division has to do with the way to AMO store treats stable releases v betas, with priority being given to stable releases even if they are months old but it means that LastPass sees v4.x as the best version to use while Mozilla, for now, recommends v3.x.

Conclusion - use online password databases with caution

The bottom line is that this type of product is now coming under greater scrutiny than it would have done in the recent past. Users need to configure it with great care and not simply assume that the basic security settings will suffice. LastPass, meanwhile, needs to take more seriously its committment to third-party security review in the way it promised to when Computerworld spoke to the company at the time of tis takeover by LogMeIn last October.

- Different browsers update plug-ins at slightly different speeds. Officially, FireFox runs a check every 24 hours, Chrome more often still. In theory, if a stable fix is available for a security hole, it should update quickly. But the only sure way to know is to check the plug-inversion number. Oddly, we encountered one Firefox install where the LastPass 4.x installation appeared to be two months out of date while reporting that no update was available. This is probably an issue with the browser itself but it underlines the need to check.

- It doesn't appear to make any difference to security whether users run version 3.x or the more recent 4.x but differences in the way they work can result in distinct vulnerabilities.

- The need to use multi-factor authentication has never been more pressing, preferably implemented using a hardware token. This is not a magic shield but increases security markedly. This means paying for the Premium version but at $12 it is surely the only responsible way to use such a critical piece of software. We would not recommend using LastPass or any online password store without this security. The risk is not only high but could be worse than using no store at all.

- As far as we can tell all of the above will apply to LastPass Enterprise users who will, presumably, mostly be using version 3.0.

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

By John E Dunn

Computerworld UK
Show Comments

Father’s Day Gift Guide

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?