Tableau hits Power Bi as 'falling short'; Microsoft fires back

The business-analytics vendor argues it's just trying to 'educate' IT and procurement execs

Business-analytics vendor Tableau Software moved to stake out its turf now that Microsoft has entered the business intelligence (BI) market, criticizing the newcomer in what it says are "10 ways Power BI Falls Short."

Tableau Chief Product Officer Francois Ajenstat said yesterday the aim is to "educate" IT and procurement executives who aren't necessarily end users of BI software but control an organization's BI budget.

"Microsoft has a lot of [market] presence, and as a result people ask," Ajenstat said. "They want to know, 'What's the difference?'" In other words: Why pay $999 or more for a Tableau desktop license when Power BI is available for free?

Tableau's criticisms of Power BI include limiting visualizations to 3,500 data points, difficulty in calculating what-if scenarios and inability to customize pop-up boxes (although Power BI does allow adding extra categories in a tool tip). Ultimately, Tableau officials believe their software is significantly better at helping people analyze, not merely visualize, data.

Not surprisingly, Microsoft vehemently disagrees with Tableau's critique.

"If you compare any two products, you will always find some capabilities that one product has, and the other is lacking," Amir Netz, Technical Fellow and Chief Architect of Microsoft Business Intelligence, said via email. "That said, I was really encouraged when I saw Tableau's list of differentiators. Tableau had to dig very deep in order to find some differentiators. What they are showing are not really features, but selective differences in the behavior of some features.

"And even with that list -- a few of these gaps have been closed, and many others are in the works."

This is an interesting time for BI software. Microsoft has moved into the market in a big way since the general launch of Power BI last summer; Google recently announced a free version of its Data Studio BI tool; and long-time specialists such as Tableau and Qlik released new, upgraded versions of their software. Add to that the increasing popularity of R, a computer language designed for statistical analysis that can be run with both Power BI and Tableau -- and there's a lot more capability now for those seeking to analyze data than there was a year or two ago.

When looking specifically at Tableau vs. Power BI to see which makes sense for what types of users, a good starting point might be that Tableau is a more obvious choice for higher-end analysis while Power BI makes sense for creating better graphics when sharing reports (especially in an organization that's already a Microsoft shop). But even if both vendors would agree, that still leaves a large and lucrative in-between market of business end users seeking so-called self-service BI to find insights in data.

"Just creating a picture, anybody can do that. For us the picture is the means of communicating the data and a way of asking questions of the data," Ajenstat said.

"There are things you can do just as well as both tools. ...You can accomplish very similar things with most tools out there," he added. The key issues he sees are a tool's "approach or journey" -- how easy is it to get what you're after -- and "speed to insight." His example: You can create a beautiful chart with the JavaScript library D3, but how much time, code and effort is required?

The Power BI motto, meanwhile, also emphasizes ease-of-use and speed: "Five minutes to wow."

So what are the differences? Tableau criticizes Power BI because:

  • Outliers can be lost in large data sets due to the 3,500-data-points limit
  • It's difficult to do even simple calculations within Power BI, such as creating a percent-of-total variable, without learning the DAX language
  • There's limited built-in trends and no forecasting (using R within Power BI might address some of this concern, but users would need to learn/know R and it's no longer a point-and-click platform)
  • Users can't "slice and dice" data by more than two categories
  • Pop-up menus can't be fully customized
  • Data can't be grouped on the fly
  • Someone else's dashboard can't be used as a starting point for additional analysis
  • It's difficult to add narratives to dashboards in order to "tell a story"
  • And it's difficult to explore what-if scenarios due to inability to input/change data directly into a Power BI dashboard

Microsoft responded with what it sees as its advantages, including:

  • Out-of-the-box content packs for dozens of data providers, making it easy for business users to connect to data
  • Dashboards that collect important visualizations from reports into what Netz called a "higher-level view"
  • Natural-language queries to explore data and create new visualizations
  • Enterprise-class Saas BI, including connecting to on-premise data
  • A data engine Microsoft says is 10 to 100 times faster than Tableau's
  • Community-created custom visualizations that use an open visualization platform (Tableau's platform, Netz pointed out, is closed and proprietary)
  • Native integration with Cortana, Excel and real-time data feeds
  • Automated quick insights
  • Integrated ETL (extract, transform and load) tool
  • A data model that supports large numbers of tables and more complex relationships between tables. "Tableau does not support more than trivial data models," according to Microsoft's emailed response.

Ultimately, though, Ajenstat doesn't believe the friction between Tableau and Power BI will affect Tableau's larger partnerships with Microsoft outside of the Power BI platform. Tableau "integrates deeply with Azure," Ajenstat noted, and was part of the SQL Server 2016 launch. And, of course, data in Excel can be pulled into Tableau.

The "list of places where we're working together is dramatically bigger than places where we overlap," he said. "We live in this world of 'co-opition.' ...For a customer, that just means choice. "

As platforms race to out-perform their competitors, those choices should continue to get more robust.

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Sharon Machlis

Computerworld (US)
Show Comments

Cool Tech

Crucial Ballistix Elite 32GB Kit (4 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 UDIMM

Learn more >

Gadgets & Things

Lexar® Professional 1000x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Family Friendly

Lexar® JumpDrive® S57 USB 3.0 flash drive 

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Plox Star Wars Death Star Levitating Bluetooth Speaker

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?