Forrester: Linux development can be more costly

Creating and maintaining a custom Web-based application with Java and Linux is almost 40 per cent more expensive than using Microsoft's software, a Microsoft-commissioned report from Forrester Research claims.

The report estimated the cost of building custom Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE) and .Net applications within large and medium-sized organisations. Forrester based its cost estimates on interviews done with IT staff at 12 sample organisations.

The study found a huge gap in software maintenance costs incurred by the two approaches, due in large part to the price difference between the BEA and Oracle software that Forrester compared to VisualStudio .Net and Microsoft SQL Server.

Software maintenance in a large organisation was estimated at $US160,000 annually for a Linux/J2EE development effort, as compared with just under $US46,000 for Microsoft users. In medium-sized businesses, the costs were $US7,775 and $US7,158 respectively.

The other major cost difference was in the time companies would spend on software development, which was increased by about a third for J2EE/Linux companies.

"If you're doing these mainstream portal style applications, you're probably going to have a faster time to market if you're using the Microsoft tool set," a Forrester vice president and co-author of the study, John Rymer, said.

Forrester estimated that the total cost of developing a custom Linux/J2EE application and supporting it for three years would be just over $2.2 million. On the Microsoft platform, the cost dropped to the $1.6 million range.

The study examined Linux and J2EE's cost only for Web portal types of applications, Rymer said, and should not be taken as a blanket statement about Linux.

"It's a statement about Linux in a certain context," he said.

More sophisticated applications, such as trading systems or telecommunications management systems, were areas where Linux might make sense, he said.

"With those sorts of applications, you might get an advantage out of going with Linux and J2EE," Rymer said. "One of the things we didn't study was re-hosting. If you've got existing Unix applications and you're not going to change them, and you just want to reduce the cost of your platform, then Linux may be a good choice for you."

Though they would have significantly reduced the software costs in the study, application development approaches based on free databases or scripting tools such as PHP (PHP Hypertext Processor.) and MySQL were not considered, Rymer said.

These free tools were not used by the sample organisations interviewed in the study, five of which were running Linux.

The Forrester report is the second broadside on Linux by Microsoft in the last week.

Last Thursday, MS released benchmark numbers showing that Windows on Intel had better price performance than Linux on the IBM z900 mainframe when it came to file and Web serving tasks.

After conceding that its previous, more emotionally charged attacks on Linux had backfired, the company changed tactics and in July resolved to fight a fact-based campaign against Linux. The Forrester study is another part of this campaign, according to Microsoft's general manager of platform strategy, Martin Taylor.

The Forrester report can be found here: http://download.microsoft.com/download/7/3/e/73e77129-db34-4c95-b182-ab0b9bd50081/TEICaseStudy.pdf

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Struggling for Christmas presents this year? Check out our Christmas Gift Guide for some top tech suggestions and more.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Robert McMillan

IDG News Service

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?