Drivers for (Windows) Me?

But it's often the case with Windows updates that drivers don't yet exist when the upgrade ships or that new drivers don't work quite smoothly. Microsoft Windows 2000, released in February, promised to be an operating system with better stability and security than prior Windows releases . But missing drivers has left many Windows 2000 customers with software and hardware incompatibility problems.

Part of the problem with Windows 2000 is that people loaded it on desktops hoping to use it as a more stable Windows 98, says Jeffrey Tarter, editor and publisher of Softletter. But Windows 98 is really the choice for home use, while Windows 2000 appears even on servers.

"If you're trying to run Windows 2000 as a game machine or using it for multimedia applications, you're going to have compatibility problems," Tarter says. And missing device drivers remains an issue for Windows 2000.

According to Dan Kusnetsky, vice president of system software at IDC, "There are still issues with missing Windows 2000 drivers for older and obscure printers, drives, and scanners."

Fewer Driver Woes for Me

Fortunately, early predictions foretell a less frustrating migration for Windows Millennium edition. Microsoft froze the Windows Me code in June, so vendors have had several months to update their drivers.

Neither Tarter nor Kusnetsky expect as many driver problems with Windows Millennium Edition as occurred with Windows 2000.

"Windows Me is just another version of Windows 9x," Tarter says. "I don't think there's anything particularly new, just chrome and tailfins."

Where you could run into compatibility problems is with older devices that use 16-bit drivers, Kusnetsky suggests.

"Windows Me is basically Windows 98 with the 16-bit subsystems partially removed," Kusnetsky says. "Devices with 32-bit Windows 95 or 98 drivers will probably work fine, but 16-bit drivers might be a problem."

Check Vendors for Latest Drivers

Major peripherals vendors such as graphics card maker ATI and zip drive vendor Iomega say drivers are ready for use with Windows Me.

"Iomega Zip, Jaz, PocketZip, and CD-RW drives from Iomega work flawlessly Windows Me," says Todd Schuelke, Iomega product reviews manager.

And even if you don't have the latest version of Iomega's IomegaWare utility suite, Windows Me has bundled native support for Iomega drives and adaptors in a variety of interfaces, including USB, ATAPI, FireWire, PC Card, and SCSI, he says.

But to take advantage of Iomega's full suite of utilities, you may want to download the vendor's version, Schuelke adds. The latest free version of IomegaWare 2.5 and Quik Sync 2 version 2.02 were both released earlier this year.

Adaptec also says it's ready for Windows Me. In May, the company announced that its protection and system recovery software, GoBack 2.2, would support Windows Me. Now Adaptec also says its SCSI products are compatible.

"All our drivers for our SCSI products are available and embedded in Windows Me," says Paul Griffith, software marketing manager for Adaptec's core SCSI group. "We've gone through the standard process to obtain Microsoft's Windows Hardware certification, and all of our SCSI products have passed."

Symantec's Ready

Antivirus software vendor Symantec says the newest updates to its desktop lineup are all Windows Me compatible.

"The new products -- Norton SystemWorks 2001, Norton AntiVirus 2001, Norton Utilities 2001, Norton CleanSweep 2001, and Norton Ghost 2001 -- are hitting the shelves as we speak with Windows Me compatibility," says Sarah Hicks, senior director of product management at Symantec. "New versions of our Internet security products will be available soon."

Having a whole summer to prepare for the newest Windows release has apparently helped. Still, some vendors may not bother developing new drivers for older products. Analysts suggest you check with Microsoft and the hardware or software vendor to see if your preferred devices or applications have -- or will get -- a compatible driver for Windows Me.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Cameron Crouch

PC World

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?