Reply to comment

Without hearing what was the offending part because it is to offensive to comment is a fascist argument to censor the defendant's contesting by a clever loophole. There are horrible rape and murder cases that are argued with full disclosure the details of the offense for the cause of serving justice, leaving no ambiguity as to a charges validity. Refusing to say what it is because it disgusts you only proves you are to weak to effectively hear the case due to your own bias. If the material in question has 'no place being disclosed in the courtroom due to its pornographic nature' then maybe that basis alone is not what constitutes an acceptable court case. A crime must be described if it occurred, victims and property tabulated, and motivations and factors in the perpetrators involvement are weighed. If the only part that comes into it at the end is the perpetrator is getting themselves and others aroused - as adults are still allowed to do I hear - then the other 2 factors (victims and property), I assume are not an issue here unless these were snuff films, in which case several other capital offenses would apply instead.
Rigged.