Saturday | 5 Jul 2008
PC world
Site Menu
Review Finder
PC World Business
Resource Centre

News

INFOSEC - Schneier: Lots of security software is 'snake oil'
Security guru Bruce Schneier talks about the effectiveness of security products and the psychology of security
Jeremy Kirk (IDG News Service) 23/04/2008 07:52:30

iPhone Centre
iPhone CentreFind out all about the iPhone at our iPhone Centre. News, reviews, how-tos and video - all in one location.
  • +

    Tomizone announces independent Wi-Fi for the iPhone 04/07/2008 14:10:00

    First independent iPhone Wi-Fi service
    Wi-Fi operator Tomizone yesterday announced an independent Australian Wi-Fi service for the Apple iPhone. The service is slated to begin on 11 July, the same day the iPhone 3G is released locally.
  • +

    The low-down on the iPhone 3G down-under 04/07/2008 08:55:58

    Australia will be among the first 22 countries alongside the US, UK, Germany and Japan, to receive the new iPhone from Friday, July 11.
  • +

    Expect iPhone scams, security firm says 04/07/2008 08:04:25

    Apple's launch of its new iPhone 3G will produce a flurry of spam and scams, a security company warned Thursday.
Zones
Zone logoZones provide focussed content from PC World and leading technology partners.

Bruce Schneier is one of the foremost experts on cryptography and is a well-known security author and commentator. He is the founder of the managed security services company Counterpane, which was acquired in October 2006 by BT. Schneier sat down with IDG News Service at the Infosec security show in London to talk about the effectiveness of security products and the psychology of security.

Are antivirus products just making money by giving people a "feeling" of security rather than true security?

Schneier: Antivirus is easy. Antivirus products actually work. They have for years. A lot of the software on this show floor is just snake oil, but antivirus does work. You should have an antivirus program. You should have it updated regularly. It doesn't make you secure, but it gets that bottom layer of the trivial stuff. That's why. It's not sufficient but it's certainly necessary.

People are tricked into downloading malicious software through social engineering. Have people become too conditioned -- mainly through watching television -- to also believe whatever appears on their monitor?

Yes, but it's not television. People know the Internet is not television. People believe what they see on the Net not because of television but because of the trappings of reality. So when you got to BT.com, you see the BT logo, the BT font, the PR material, and you'll think, yeah, it's BT, like when you go to your bank, you see the logo, the tellers. That's real, that's expensive stuff.

On the Web, it could be a fake BT.com site and you don't notice because it's trivially easy to copy. So people do believe what they see on the Internet, not because of television, but because the Internet has the trappings of the real world. So all of those social cues you get to know to trust something -- it looks professional, nothing's misspelled, you see those things and you believe it's real. So yes, people are conditioned to accept it but it's from a whole variety of social conditioning.

Do you think people will ever gain a greater suspicion of the Internet?

Younger people have better bullshit detectors and they'll pick it up. But certainly you can always fool people unless there is some external validation of [Web sites]. Microsoft tried to do that. Unless you can do that, there's no guarantee you're not going to be fooled.

How do we train our brains to be more perceptive?

Experience. Understanding the threats.

So what do you think is the biggest threat right now?

Crime.

So how do you fix it? It's expensive to investigate, it's cross-jurisdictional.

It might not be fixable. A lot of [the solution] is going to be making the things that criminals are going after harder to get. You're not going to stop the criminals. But in the United States, it's really easy to get a credit card in someone else's name. The credit card companies like it that way. So a lot of it is looking at how the criminals are attacking things and making it harder to attack them. The brokerage companies want it to be easy for you to log on and make trades. Make it harder, and the businesses don't like that.

They're afraid they're going to drive away customers?

Of course. If I strip search you before you go into the bank, you might change branches. In the US, the government doesn't have the balls to require stuff like [stronger authentication]. You've got to make the banks responsible for losses. The brokerage company has to [reimburse] me if I didn't make the trade. Period. End of sentence. That's how you fix it. Because then, my brokerage is going to start buying security, otherwise they won't. The basic rule of security: You make the entity in the best position to mitigate the risk, responsible for the risk. Make them responsible. They'll figure it out. That's how capitalism works.

More about Microsoft, Counterpane, BT

Recommend this article?
Yes3 votes
No0 votes
Market Place
Sponsored Links
close
Hot Deals
What’s New
Sponsored Links