Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
The math is simple: n00b hand-holding plus angry 'l33t' players equals a lot of bitching and moaning
- It's more Modern Warfare -- and really, isn't that what you wanted?
- There will be blood spilled over the n00b friendly concessions, and the controversy will no doubt detract from the fun
Infinity Ward returns with a follow-up to the critically acclaimed Modern Warfare that has already stirred up controversy over the now infamous airport level. But don't let that distract you from the real discussion: is the game any good? The game definitely has potential but its place in video game history will ultimately be decided by the fanatic online community who may take issue with some of the n00b friendly changes.
Price$ 119.00 (AUD)
The first rule of my own personal reviews philosophy is "Remain objective" but that's almost impossible when dealing with a franchise that's as critically and financially successful as Call of Duty. I've been a fan of the series since its inception (though I hated Call of Duty 3 as much as you did) so I couldn't help but have high expectations for Modern Warfare 2, the sequel to the obscenely successful Modern Warfare. My attempts to remain objective weren't helped by the fact that, instead of being sent a review build, as is usually the case, I was offered a trip down to Infinity Ward's offices for a two-day Modern Warfare 2 marathon.
This isn't an ideal scenario for a reviewer because the company involved can prepare an optimal review environment to put their game in the best possible light. I was given a fairly ideal setup during my time at Infinity Ward: a large HDTV, a booming 5.1 sound system and members of the dev team waiting to hold my hand through a sampling of the multiplayer options. But to be fair to publisher Activision, who set up the trip, once I arrived, I was largely left alone; my handler only interrupted me to ask if I needed to go to the bathroom or to offer me something to eat. There was no heavy handed sales pitch and no one sat in the room with me constantly pointing things out. But even if I had played the game in the comfort of my bedroom or the GamePro offices, even if I had had to figure out the Spec Ops and multiplayer modes on my own, Modern Warfare 2 still would have impressed me with its intensity and polish. From the appetite whetting single-player to the main course multiplayer, the game more than lives up to the high bar set by the original, even if it makes some concessions to its own popularity that may make the diehard fans grumble.
And that's a little surprising when you consider how many copies the original Modern Warfare sold; it seems a bit odd that Infinity Ward would implement concepts so obviously geared towards new players who might buy the game instead of focusing on catering to the core fans who most definitely will. The first thing I immediately noticed was the addition of an aim-assist mechanic which let's you auto-lock onto to the nearest enemy by pressing the left trigger; you can easily cycle through multiple tangos with a few trigger pulls. I turned it off after about five minutes because it took the skill out of the game. The new Death Perks will also have some players screaming conspiracy: die enough times in a row without getting a kill in multiplayer and you get a perk such as a temporary health boost; the unfortunate downside is that skilled players who rarely die with never benefit from them. Oh, and if you break a cold streak by getting a kill, you get a bonus XP boost, which is just more gasoline on the "rewarding n00bs for sucking" campfire.
Add it all up and the math is simple: n00b hand-holding plus angry 'l33t' players equals a lot of bitching and moaning. It's a delicate line between levelling the playing field and nerfing the game, and only time will tell which side Infinity Ward landed on; one thing's for sure, though--I can already smell the fumes from the forum flamewars these decisions will ignite on the Internet.
But working in Infinity Ward's favor is the fact that, despite these notable changes, the rest of the experience is still vintage Modern Warfare. The single-player still plays out like an episode of Fox's '24' with a heavy dose of CNN and 'Future Weapons' thrown in as garnish and there are a lot of high points, including a certain level that outdoes the original's introductory execution scene in terms of shock value; the cat's already been let out of the bag thanks to some Internet footage leaked by someone who also probably drove by Harry Potter fans waiting in line for 'The Half-Blood Prince' and shouted "Dumbledore dies!" but I had the prestigious advantage of experiencing it without any preexisting biases. My first thought after playing through that particular level was "Holy shit, I can't believe they tried that," and after some introspective mulling, I followed it up with, "And I can't believe they pulled it off." It's definitely an interesting experiment, and one that I'll discuss in-depth in a follow-up feature, but it was a bold and calculated maneuver that will be talked about at length.
Unfortunately, the single-player also contains some low points where the action bogs down with generic FPS run-and-gun segments complete with invisible trigger points and infinitely respawning enemies; still, it's an enjoyable eight hour experience that offers enough memorable moments to make it worth your while. I'm still shocked to hear about people who jump straight into multiplayer as soon as they open up the case; that's like buying a pizza and immediately throwing away the crust.
But as much as I liked the single-player, even I have to admit that the multiplayer is where the real action is, and its new additions should (hopefully) help counterbalance some (but probably not all) of the dissension that will arise from the n00b friendly changes I noted above. Spec Ops offers up a series of objective based missions which can be played solo or with a partner and they run the gamut from timed "kill every enemy" affairs to fantastic "overwatch" scenarios where one player provides air support--either from an AC-130 or an attack helo -- while his partner tries to survive on the ground. I had the benefit of playing Spec Ops with a seasoned partner -- a member of the dev team with the callsign IWSoupy--who actively kept up the chatter to ensure we were on the same page, which proved one thing: with the right partner (read: someone willing to play the game right and actually communicate, which may be a rarer breed of gamer than you'd think or hope), Spec Ops provides some interesting moments. I especially liked the stealth missions: on one memorable level, my partner and I pulled on our Ghillie suits and slowly navigated from one end of a sprawling level to the other while cooperatively dealing with enemy patrols and hidden snipers; it took us over 30 minutes to get to the end and I wasn't bored once.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 2 Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- 3 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
- 4 Apple iPhone 7 Plus review: including Portrait Mode
- 5 MSI GS70 laptop review
Latest News Articles
- Dead Rising 4 impressions: 'Tis the season to BBQ zombies with your flaming sword
- This week in games: Free Titanfall 2 weekend, Star Wars Battlefront meets Rogue One
- Every new game revealed at The Game Awards 2016, from Guardians of the Galaxy to Zelda
- Watch Dogs 2 PC impressions: A smooth-running romp through meme-filled San Francisco
- Hearthstone fans now have a dedicated Skype chat room to challenge its best players
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- CCSenior Cisco Network EngineerWA
- CCSSIS DeveloperNSW
- CCJava DeveloperWA
- PTService Desk AnalystVIC
- CCSystems AdministratorQLD
- FTService Desk Team LeaderNSW
- CCSAP PM/ MRS ConsultantVIC
- FTWeb Developer/ DesignerSA
- FTSenior Business AnalystSA
- FTSoftware Sales & BDMNSW
- CCService Desk Consultants - Urgent - Large multinational!!NSW
- CCInfrastructure Team LeadNSW
- FTIOS Developer (Permanent) Finance CBDNSW
- CCSolution Designer - Investment/Trading PlatformNSW
- CCHadoop DeveloperVIC
- FTService Desk AnalystNSW
- CCNetwork Solution Designer/Architect - Finance - Contract - SydneyNSW
- TPDevelopers and TestersACT
- FTBusiness Development Manager | Digital MarketNSW
- TPProject CoordinatorNSW
- FTBusiness Reporting AnalystNSW
- FTDesktop Deployment EngineerWA
- FTSolutions Architect - Data Centre/ NetworkSA
- CCInformation Security ConsultantNSW
- TPService Desk Analyst - Out of hoursSA