AMD ATI Radeon HD 4870 x2
High-end enthusiast graphics card
- Offers a multi-GPU solution without needing a CrossFire-capable motherboard, improved PCI-Express bridge for faster data exchange, gave a solid performance in most of our benchmarks
- Sub-par performance in Crysis, power consumption too high
If you’re a stickler for innovation, ATI’s ‘double-or-nothing’ approach is unlikely to tickle your fancy, but it remains a powerful performer. On the other hand, its benchmark results were not as impressive as we would have liked from a top-end graphics card.
No, you’re not seeing double. The Radeon HD 4870 x2 is the latest ATI graphics card to take the contentious ‘two-up’ gamble. As its name rather heavily implies, this behemoth of a card is essentially two HD 4870s rolled into one; providing a significant boost in raw processing power. It’s a concept we’ve seen plenty of times in the past, including last generation’s Radeon HD3870 X2 (which this model is a spiritual successor to). Whether the coins of fate come down in your favour will largely depend on the kind of games you like to play. As it stands, most punters would be better off plumbing for NVIDIA’s single-GPU GTX 280; which offers a bigger bang for a similar asking price.
Based on the same 55nm RV770 chipset as the standard HD 4870 card, the HD 4870 x2 comes with a core clock speed of 750MHz, memory and shader clock speeds of 3600MHz and 750MHz, and a 256-bit memory bus. Beyond that, all major components have been effectively doubled — that’s 1.9 billion transistors, 1600 stream processors, 2.4 teraFLOPS of processing power and 2GB of GDDR5 memory.
Of course, all these specification are slightly misleading, as they are actually spread over two separate GPUs. A PCI express bridge connects the two processors; effectively providing a Crossfire configuration on a single printed circuit board. In short, this means you don’t get double the performance, although the improvement is still significant. ATI has also overhauled its PCI-Express bridge chip, allowing faster data transfer rates of up to 6.8GBps.
We ran our benchmarks on a Vista 32-bit machine equipped with 1GB of DDR2 RAM, a 750GB Barracuda ES hard drive and a 2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Quad CPU. We then compared the results to Asus’ ENGTX280 TOP (HTDP/1G/A) — a factory overclocked card based on NVIDIA's latest GTX 280 graphics chip. (GTX280-based cards retail for around the same price as the Radeon HD 4870 x2, and are currently its chief rival).
The results garnered by the HD 4870 x2 were a bit of a mish-mash to be honest, but we were still quite impressed by its overall performance. In 3DMark 06, the HD 4870 x2 received the highest score we have ever seen when using this test bed — a truly phenomenal 14,430 marks. Asus’ ENGTX280 TOP (HTDP/1G/A) managed a score of 12,724.
In our Half-Life 2 performance test, the HD 4870 averaged a frame rate of 171.2 frames per second, which was eight frames faster than the ENGTX280 TOP (HTDP/1G/A). The game F.E.A.R also fared better on the Radeon card, averaging 194fps (compared to the ENGTX280 TOP’s 154fps). However, when it came to Lost: Extreme Conditions (which happens to be the most recent and graphically demanding game of the bunch), the HD 4870 was seven frames slower than its NVIDIA rival (110fps vs. 117fps).
Our DirectX 10 gaming benchmarks also returned varied results. In Lost Planet: Extreme Conditions (DX10 Edition), the card chugged along at a respectable 56fps; which was eight frames faster than the ENGTX280 TOP. However, the power-hungry Crysis averaged a not-very-playable 23.9fps. This was significantly slower than the ENGTX280 TOP, which averaged 37.32fps.
Our Call of Juarez demo fared a lot better, returning a result of 84.8fps. By contrast, the ENGTX280 TOP averaged 50.9fps — a difference of over 30 frames per second. Despite its average showing in Call of Juarez, the ENGTX280 TOP (HTDP/1G/A) is still the clear winner when it comes to high-end gaming (unless you really dig Call of Juarez, that is).
In terms of design, the HD 4870 x2 is suitably big and chunky. It requires two PCI-E power connectors (6-pin and 8-pin) to run, and has a maximum power rating of 280W. This is definitely on the high side, and can be attributed to its multiple GPUs.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Epson EcoTank Expression ET-2500
Everki ContemPRO Roll Top Laptop Backpack
Smart LED Bulb LB130
Linksys AC5400 MU-MIMO Gigabit router
Microsoft L5V-00027 Sculpt Ergonomic Keyboard Desktop
UE Boom 2 Bluetooth speaker
Samsung portable 1TB T3 drive
Acer Swift 7
Lexar® Portable SSD
Lexar® JumpDrive® S45 USB 3.0 flash drive
Logitech G403 Prodigy mouse
Google Daydream VR headset
Huawei Mate 9
Belkin MIXIT Metallic Lightning to USB Cable
3SIXT Ultra HD Sports Action Camera
Garmin Fenix Chronos smartwatch
HD Pan/Tilt Wi-Fi Camera with Night Vision NC450
Dell XPS 13 laptop
Surface Pro 4
Audio-Technica ATH-ANC70 Noise Cancelling Headphones
Lexar® Professional 1800x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards
Blade 28 backpack by Arc’teryx
HP Pavilion x360 13”
Lexar® JumpDrive® C20c USB Type-C flash drive
Dell Inspiron 5000 series 2-in-1
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Huawei Mate 9 full in-depth smartphone review
- 2 ZTE Axon 7 review: Is ZTE dumping old stock on Australia?
- 3 Oppo R9s smartphone full review
- 4 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 5 Huawei Nova Plus smartphone review
Latest News Articles
- PC prices will continue to go up due to shortage of components
- Radeon Vega vs. GeForce GTX 1080 Ti? AMD, Nvidia announce dueling events at GDC 2017
- Toshiba's in chaos, but not quitting PCs -- yet
- Intel's 8th-gen 'Coffee Lake' chips reuse 14nm process as other Core CPUs ease into new tech
- Intel researches tech to prepare for a future beyond today's PCs
GGG Evaluation Team
I’d happily recommend this touchscreen laptop and Windows 10 as a great way to get serious work done at a desk or on the road.
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
- How to quit Pokemon Go (or to start enjoying it again)
- Huawei Mate 9 full in-depth smartphone review
- Time to ditch Foxtel and the iQ3: How to replace Foxtel packages with cheaper alternatives
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- FTOnline Solutions AnalystNSW
- TPInstructional Designer | DETQLD
- CCTelecommunication Operations SpecialistTAS
- FTApplications DeveloperACT
- FTOracle Forms PL/SQL Analyst ProgrammerQLD
- FTService Desk AnalystNSW
- FTSenior Java Developers (Several positions available)QLD
- FTSenior .Net DeveloperVIC
- TPBusiness AnalystNSW
- CCMarketing SpecialistNSW
- CCIntegration DeveloperNSW
- FTDynamics AX Functional Consultant (Sales & Marketing Modules)VIC
- CCProject Support OfficerNSW
- FTSenior Business Project ManagerNSW
- FTMicrosoft ProgrammerSA
- TP.Net DeveloperSA
- TPProject OfficerQLD
- FTERP ConsultantQLD
- TPTechnical WriterQLD
- FTSenior Project Manager - PERMANENTACT
- TPDrupal Developer - Immediate startQLD
- CCSenior Technical SpecialistNSW
- FTSenior Dot Net Backend Orientated DeveloperNSW
- TPEnvironment Specialist(DevOps)QLD
- FTFull Stack Developer (Front and Back end)QLD