- Everything else
- • • •
My son convinced me, after many years of suffering the indignities of
Microsoft, that Apple computers were the way to go. So we purchased a shiney new, top of the range iMac 27" in November 2010.
This machine has been plagued with countless problems and has been a horror from day one. Foolishly, I struggled on with this machine only to suffer the ultimate indignity of total hard disk failure. This left
me with a £1600 paperweight.
Apple computers could not be less helpful. The machine should just
be replaced – it is obviously a dud. No chance with Apple computers –
happy to replace the hard disk of a machine that is only 18 months old
at a further, extortionate, £250+VAT cost to me. This is outrageous.
Article here - http://www.thematerconsultancy.com/apple-computers-customer-care-a-lesson/
Apple iMac (mid 2011), 27in
Apple iMac 2011 review: Apple's new iMac is also its best, with plenty of power
- Sandy Bridge means big performance increases from last year’s Macs
- You can now order a Magic Trackpad for free
- Only incremental upgrades since the last iMac model
- There's still no Thunderbolt gear
Apple's new iMac is more powerful than the old model. That's about it -- nothing magical or revolutionary has been added to the all-in-one Mac desktop. That's not necessarily a bad thing, since we think it's one of the best all-in-one PCs on the market today. The extra power also means it's more than capable enough of handling any every day task thrown at it, as well as a range of reasonably intensive tasks like batch photo editing.
Price$ 2,299.00 (AUD)
The Apple iMac has received some power and performance upgrades since its last model in mid-2010. It’s now got a second generation Intel Core i5 quad-core processor, some beefy graphics power and customisable options for plenty of memory and hard drive space. Not much else has changed, however.
The iMac’s all-in-one design makes it easy to set up, especially since the bundled Apple Wireless Keyboard and Magic Mouse don’t need to be plugged in. You can also opt for an Apple Magic Trackpad when you order a new iMac from the online Apple Store — we would, but that’s because we’re navigating OS X with a trackpad. Both the Magic Trackpad and Magic Mouse are touch sensitive and have support for multitouch gestures. We think this is a move by Apple to get more users ready for OS X Lion, which brings a lot of the gestures found in iOS devices like the iPhone and iPad to the Mac desktop. You can also order both the Magic Mouse and Trackpad together, for an extra $99.
The recent Apple iMac refresh is almost all internal — the only external changes on our 27in test model compared to the last generation iMac are the two Thunderbolt ports (an identical shape to the previous MiniDisplay Port, but with a different symbol above them). We don’t have any complaints about the design at all — it’s minimalist and looks excellent. We’d happily keep an iMac on our desk, but we can see one minor downside: If you buy an iMac and want another monitor, you’ll want to buy a Cinema Display to match the design — and they’re not cheap.
Hardware and performance
The upgrade to Sandy Bridge for the iMac has had some very impressive effects in terms of the power available for everyday work. Our test 27in iMac was a top of the line (albeit off-the-shelf) 3.1GHz model with a 1TB 7200rpm hard drive, 4GB of DDR3 RAM and a AMD Radeon HD 6970M. If you want to configure a 27in iMac to your needs, you can choose an extra-powerful 3.4GHz quad-core Core i7 processor, pick a 2TB hard drive or a 256GB solid-state drive (or both), and jam in up to 16GB of memory.
These specs should mean the 27in iMac has more than enough power to keep even an enthusiast user happy with basic computing tasks as well as intensive work. We spent some time playing around with huge 21- and 24megapixel image files from the Canon EOS 5D Mark II and EOS 1Ds Mark III in Apple Aperture 3, and didn’t notice any slowdown — even when multitasking by exporting some photos while batch adjusting others.
Our Geekbench result of 8339 shows the 27in iMac’s impressive performance potential. This is roughly on par with the mid-level 15in Sandy Bridge-based Core i7 MacBook Pro, which scored 8488. It’s far ahead of the performance offered by even last year’s Macs — the mid-2010 MacBook Pro scored a comparatively mediocre 4967, and a beefed-up 27in iMac from the middle of the year scored 6895. If you want even more power, the 3.4GHz i7 upgrade for the iMac isn’t prohibitively expensive at $240 and should give a huge performance boost.
The new Apple iMac is more than powerful enough for everyday purposes, and we’d even recommend it for professional use — someone like a video editor or photographer is well catered for with the range of power and storage upgrades available, and Thunderbolt means high-speed storage connectivity or multiple monitors can be added simply. The price is reasonable given the power available on tap.
- Pretty screen
- Everything else
- • • •
My first experience with Apple has been poor. My 18 month old, top of the range iMac 27" has caused me nothing but repeated difficulties. Too many problems to document here. Culminating in total HD failure. Apple could not be less interested.
So, £1600 lighter in the wallet, I am forced back to Microsoft. I would advise people to think very carefully before wasting their money on Apple.
Full story here - http://www.thematerconsultancy.com/apple-computers-customer-care-a-lesson/
- Graphics, system speed, user interface and more
- It's not perfect, but it's awfully close. y
- • • •
I doubt if Phil even owns one, if he did he would know that there are a lot of professional programs available for the Mac, you don't say what programs you want, bashers and trolls aren't cool your post marks you as one or the other.
I purchased my 27 inch, 3.4GHz with 2 TB hard drive, AMD 2970M with 2 Gigs of video ram. I added another 4 gigs of ram myself, it's cheaper than having Apple do it, and a 3 year Apple care extended warranty. Total US dollar cost $2500 plus. Do I like it, I flat love it. The first movie I played on it was Horatio Hornblower/ Duty, i felt like I was getting sea sick, before I moved back a couple of feet
Latest News Articles
- IT security is national security -- but you're not alone
- Exclusive: Google's Project Loon tests move to LTE band in Nevada
- Enterprise who? Google says little about Apps, business cloud services in Q1 report
- Samsung teams with GlobalFoundries on 3D chips
- World Tech Update: Google buys drone maker Titan Aerospace and NHK shows off 8K television
Most Popular Articles
- 1 Top 5 reasons to hate the Samsung Galaxy S5
- 2 Windows 7 Home Premium vs. Windows 7 Professional
- 3 What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- 4 Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- 5 How do I connect my TV to the Internet?
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
Best Deals on GoodGearGuide
- Desktop PCs View all »
- Notebooks View all »
- Tablets View all »
- Servers & Storage View all »
- Software and Services View all »