Apple Safari 4
Apple Safari 4 is more than just one of the fastest web browsers for Windows and Mac.
- Extremely fast page rendering,
- Too soon to make a definitive judgement
Safari 4 has come out of its short beta period to blossom as a remarkably attractive and well featured modern web browser. For Windows users, Safari has previously been something of an also-ran behind Firefox and IE, but with Safari 4, the browser could catch up on XP to Windows 7 systems too. Safari 4 is extremely fast in its page rendering thanks to the refined WebKit engine, and offers some genuinely useful user interface elements which make finding sites quicker and browsing a more comfortable experience.
Apple's web browser has been around for six years, and with Safari 4 we find a stable, mature web browser with both excellent speed and standards compliance.
Safari debuted in Mac OS X 10.3, but many people today will be familiar with Safari as the web browser for the iPhone. For the principal two personal computer OSes in the world, we now have Safari 4 for Mac and for Windows, the fastest and most feature-packed iteration yet of this relative newcomer.
But being an Apple app, more features doesn't immediately equal more user complexity. Open Safari 4, and the main window is automatically populated with Top Sites, a wall of thumbnail pages based on your browsing habits. Clicking on any of these brings you directly to your site, making a good visual aid to quick browsing.
You can also manually assign what sites will appear in this space, and the thumbnails you see are updated regularly, to reflect up-to-date content on your favourite sites, all in miniature.
To customise the layout, you just click the Edit button in the bottom left corner, and select either the X to delete or a pin symbol to ‘fix' any displayed site.
Safari was one of the first web browsers to include tabs to allow easy switching between different pages within the same window. Safari 4 beta, released earlier this year, put those tabs above the address bar, increasing space available to view page content below.
This had the side effect of removing the easy reordering of tab positions just by dragging. It also made complete window reposition somewhat more challenging, as grabbing the window by its top bar could cause an inadvertent switch to the page of the tab you picked up.
Apple may have listened to the critics; the tabs are now firmly back below the navigation bar, in what must be said is a more visually elegant arrangement.
Also changed since the beta is the way that page-load progress is indicated.
Safari 3 and earlier used to colour in the space behind the address with an expanding blue bar - a sight familiar more to iPhone users, due to the slower loading process - while Safari 4 beta relied on just a spinning cogwheel (which also doubled as a Stop loading button, since the usual discrete Reload and Stop buttons had been removed).
Now in Safari 4 we have a graphical device at the end of the address field which shows ‘Loading...' and also spins a cog as the page completes.
With a typical broadband connection, you won't be looking at the loading icon for long, though. We found Safari 4 to be quick — very quick in fact — in its page rendering. For many sites we visited, pages would appear just as quick as clicked.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 2 Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- 3 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
- 4 Apple iPhone 7 Plus review: including Portrait Mode
- 5 MSI GS70 laptop review
Latest News Articles
- Rowland says govt supressing unflattering NBN information
- Google's Trusted Contacts pings your loved ones when you need them most
- Chrome 55 pushes Flash into the background
- Chrome bug triggered errors on websites using Symantec SSL certificates
- 2016 will be 1 second longer: Google can help you cope
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- CCSenior Networks EngineerVIC
- CCTechnical Security LeadVIC
- CCSenior Platform DeveloperNSW
- FTCampaign AnalystVIC
- FTERP Support ConsultantQLD
- CCSystem EngineerVIC
- TPProject ManagerVIC
- TPSharepoint 2013 AnalystQLD
- FTWeb Developer/ DesignerQLD
- CCData Scientist (Big Data)VIC
- FTPractice AdvisorQLD
- FTMid Level .Net DeveloperNSW
- CCBusiness AnalystQLD
- FTManager Integration PlanningNSW
- FTTest AnalystVIC
- TPProjects Planning ManagerQLD
- FTSenior Front End DeveloperNSW
- FTMotor Claims ConsultantNSW
- TPSenior Project AnalystNSW
- CCMainframe ArchitectVIC
- CCEOI - TIBCO DeveloperNSW
- CCProject Manager- Office 365 and Core Azure servicesNSW
- CCNetwork Deployment SpecialistNSW
- TPBusiness Change ManagerQLD
- FTTechnical Business AnalystNSW