ASUS Radeon HD 7870 TOP DirectCU II graphics card
The AMD Radeon HD 7870 is a solid mid-range graphics card
- Good performance from mid-range
- Outclassed by slightly costlier GTX 670
The ASUS Radeon HD 7870 is a factory-overclocked mid-range card that has good performance figures. If you can find it cheap it'll run modern games comfortable on a medium-sized monitor.
Price$ 425.00 (AUD)
AMD's Radeon HD 7870 graphics card is a mid-range model, sitting above the 7700 series and below the high-end 7900 series. AMD's 'Pitcairn' GPU is a solid mid-range performer without the price tag of more powerful units. This ASUS Radeon HD 7870 TOP DirectCU II model has better cooling and more power than a standard design, making it a good value choice.
Mid-range graphics cards generally hit a good compromise between power and pricing — they're not nearly as expensive as outlandish, top-of-the-line dual GPU or single GPU powerhouses like the AMD Radeon HD 7970 or upcoming 7990. Despite a more accessible price tag — one of these would be at home in a custom-built PC with a price tag under $1500 — the 7870 doesn't sacrifice a great deal of performance.
The Radeon HD 7870 is always going to be compared to the HD 7970, and for good reason. The 7870 uses the latest 28nm GPU manufacturing process, so it's as efficient and modern as any other graphics card available. It's quite similar in its specifications to a 7970, although it only has 2GB of GDDR5 RAM versus the 7970's 3GB.
The ASUS TOP branding denotes a card that has extra power over a standard model; this ASUS Radeon HD 7870 TOP DirectCU II's GPU comes in at 1100MHz versus the reference design's 1000Mhz, a 10 per cent speed bump that should see a comparable lift in benchmark performance. RAM speed is boosted from 1200MHz to 1250MHz.
Compared to the HD 7970, the ASUS Radeon HD 7870's memory interface is only 256-bit (versus 384-bit in the more expensive card) and bandwith is 154.9GBps (versus 264GBps). The 7870 has the same number of raster pipelines as the 7970, but drops some texture units (80 versus 128) for a middling overall texture fill rate of 80.8GTps (versus 118.4GTps).
The main Nvidia competitor for the 7870 is the Geforce GTX 670, which comes at a slight price premium. It's generally an equal competitor for the 7870 in specifications, but has 1344 stream processors to the 7870's 1280. The 7970 blitzes them both with 2048.
The ASUS Radeon HD 7870 TOP uses a modest 175 Watts of power, only 5 Watts more than a GTX 670. The upscale Radeon HD 7970 uses plenty more at 225 Watts.
ASUS Radeon HD 7870 TOP DirectCU II: Performance
The ASUS Radeon HD 7870 TOP is outclassed by both the GTX 670 and the Radeon HD 7970. Both these cards are closely matched, with the GTX 670 giving the better performance per dollar. the 7870's performance is still strong considering its mid-range classification, though — and you don't need a high-end card to run modern games at impressively detailed settings.
While the GTX 670 is very competitive against the 7970, the 7870 lags some way behind. In BattleForge, for example, while the GTX 670 and the 7970 are fighting it out on figures of 79 and 80fps, the 7870 is stuck down at 71.3 at a resolution of 1680 x 1050.
PC Advisor's benchmarks for the ASUS Radeon HD 7870 TOP DirectCU II are as follows:
Crysis 2, 1680x1050: 42.6 frames per second
Crysis 2, 1920x1200: 33.7 frames per second
Crysis 2, 2560x1600: 22.6 frames per second
Battleforge, 1680x1050: 71.3 frames per second
Battleforge, 1920x1200: 59.4 frames per second
Battleforge, 2560x1600: 41.2 frames per second
Stalker: Shadow of Pripyat, 1680x1050: 79.2 frames per second
Stalker: Shadow of Pripyat, 1920x1200: 71.3 frames per second
Stalker: Shadow of Pripyat, 2560x1600: 49.5 frames per second
The 7870 maintains playable performance in almost all resolutions, with the maxed-out Crysis 2 dipping into choppy territory at 2560x1600: the domain of 27in or larger LCD monitors. If you're using the Radeon HD 7870 on a smaller monitor, it will perform acceptably with modern games.
ASUS Radeon HD 7870 TOP DirectCU II: Conclusion
The HD 7870 proves that mid-range cards are more than capable of handling modern games acceptably, despite inferior specifications to high-end models. It's also much cheaper. ASUS's TOP models are only slightly more expensive than standard but have a 10 per cent overclock to raise performance — good value if you can find competitive prices.
Join the PC World newsletter!
UE Boom 2 Bluetooth speaker
Microsoft L5V-00027 Sculpt Ergonomic Keyboard Desktop
Samsung portable 1TB T3 drive
Epson EcoTank Expression ET-2500
Everki ContemPRO Roll Top Laptop Backpack
Lexar® JumpDrive® S57 USB 3.0 flash drive
Linksys AC5400 MU-MIMO Gigabit router
Lexar® Portable SSD
Huawei Mate 9
3SIXT Ultra HD Sports Action Camera
Belkin MIXIT Metallic Lightning to USB Cable
Google Daydream VR headset
Acer Swift 7
Lexar® JumpDrive® S45 USB 3.0 flash drive
Logitech G403 Prodigy mouse
HP Pavilion x360 13”
Surface Pro 4
HD Pan/Tilt Wi-Fi Camera with Night Vision NC450
Audio-Technica ATH-ANC70 Noise Cancelling Headphones
Lexar® JumpDrive® C20c USB Type-C flash drive
Garmin Fenix Chronos smartwatch
Dell Inspiron 5000 series 2-in-1
Lexar® Professional 1800x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards
Dell XPS 13 laptop
Blade 28 backpack by Arc’teryx
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Huawei Mate 9 full in-depth smartphone review
- 2 ZTE Axon 7 review: Is ZTE dumping old stock on Australia?
- 3 Oppo R9s smartphone full review
- 4 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 5 Huawei Nova Plus smartphone review
Latest News Articles
- PC prices will continue to go up due to shortage of components
- Radeon Vega vs. GeForce GTX 1080 Ti? AMD, Nvidia announce dueling events at GDC 2017
- Toshiba's in chaos, but not quitting PCs -- yet
- Intel's 8th-gen 'Coffee Lake' chips reuse 14nm process as other Core CPUs ease into new tech
- Intel researches tech to prepare for a future beyond today's PCs
GGG Evaluation Team
I’d happily recommend this touchscreen laptop and Windows 10 as a great way to get serious work done at a desk or on the road.
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
- How to quit Pokemon Go (or to start enjoying it again)
- Huawei Mate 9 full in-depth smartphone review
- Time to ditch Foxtel and the iQ3: How to replace Foxtel packages with cheaper alternatives
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- TPBusiness Process Analyst (Newcaslte Based)NSW
- TPProject ManagerOther
- CCUnix Systems AdministratorNSW
- FTSolution ArchitectNSW
- TPBI Commercial AnalystVIC
- FTDatabase DeveloperACT
- FTSoftware DeveloperVIC
- CCDevops EngineerNSW
- CCWindows AdministratorACT
- TPIT Project CoordinatorVIC
- TPJunior Project ManagerVIC
- CCSenior Life 400 DeveloperNSW
- CCPMO Analyst - Financial ServicesNSW
- FTService Desk AnalystNSW
- CCSystem EngineerSA
- CCManager AnalyticsNSW
- TPBusiness AnalystVIC
- CCSAP/ Nakisa Implementation ConsultantQLD
- FTSenior Solution ArchitectSA
- CCTest ManagerWA
- TPHRIS Business AnalystQLD
- CCService Designer (CX)NSW
- FTProject Manager (Software product development)VIC
- CCMarketing SpecialistNSW
- CCFirewall EngineerNSW