First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
ASUS TS mini Home Server
A Windows-based NAS device with 1TB of storage, impressive online capabilities
ASUS' TS mini Home Server is a Windows-based network-attached storage device that includes 1TB of storage. Although it doesn't provide the flexibility of do-it-yourself NAS devices, its performance results and online storage platform certainly justify its price.
- Includes 1TB storage, 500GB of additional online storage for backup, good performance when dealing with large files, simple configuration and backups
- Lack of Mac and Linux support, difficult to access hard drive bay, Windows Home Server console can be slow, poor small file transfer performance
ASUS' TS mini Home Server won't suit a Mac-centric home set-up, but its online storage platform and file transfer performance make it a reasonably priced choice for streaming media and backing up Windows PCs.
Price$ 699.00 (AUD)
The TS mini Home Server has space for a second hard drive, but it's difficult to get to.
The ASUS TS mini Home Server is quite boxy and not very attractive, but it's small enough to fit into a few nooks and crannies. Unlike most NAS devices, this is an enclosed server and doesn't have any drive bays. It does, however, have two internal drive slots, allowing tech savvy users to pry open the case to install a second 3.5in hard drive. You won't be able to remove the primary volume; however as this holds the NAS device's operating system.
ASUS' NAS device lacks any connectivity or buttons on the front. There's a power button on top, and all connectivity is relegated to the back of the unit, including the six USB 2.0 ports, two eSATA ports and a single Gigabit Ethernet port. You can plug any NTFS-formatted external hard drive into the NAS device and either add to the total storage pool using Windows Home Server's Drive Extender, or backup, synchronise and manage/delete files using ASUS' Xtor Manager add-in.
Like the QNAP TS-210 Turbo, ASUS' TS mini Home Server is powered by an Intel Atom processor clocked at 1.66GHz. It also packs 1GB of DDR2 memory, which is certainly enough to maintain and serve the 1TB storage capacity between several users.
The TS mini Home Server runs the Windows Home Server operating system which, as we found with HP's EX490 MediaSmart Server, can have both its advantages and disadvantages. For instance, you'll have to maintain and administer the NAS device through a remote console rather than a Web-based interface, which in our tests can make for slow and painful configuration experience.
Windows Home Server's benefits largely lie in its simplicity and ease of use. Rather than mucking around with RAID configurations and volume letters, users can simply include any additional internal and external hard drives into the NAS device's storage pool. The aforementioned Drive Extender feature is handy for expanding storage, and it even takes redundancy into account, although it does limit the storage volume's overall performance.
Enabling media features like the TwonkyMedia-powered UPnP server and Windows Media Centre integration are also quite easy and in the case of the latter, it simply demands some additional software. The console's interface also makes it easy to configure monitored media folders as well as the TwonkyMedia server, without accessing the rather unkempt Web ser interface.
The ASUS' TS mini Home Server is tightly integrated with Windows XP, Vista and 7, allowing you to automatically setup and configure backups on any computer installed with the Windows Home Server Connector. HP's NAS device added reasonable support for Macs too, with a similarly capable remote console and Time Machine backups, but ASUS' offering shows no sign of either Linux or Mac support.
ASUS provides TS mini Home Server users with 500GB of online storage.
ASUS adds to the Windows Home Server OS through enhanced external and Web-based storage. The Xtor Manager add-in allows you to see individual external drives, with the ability to backup or synchronise internal storage with the hard drives. The ASUS WebStorage add-in provides access to the same online storage platform found on many of the company's Eee PC netbooks. It's a particularly impressive addition, giving users 500GB of storage for backups and synchronisation.
We tested the 1TB configuration of ASUS' TS mini Home Server, connected through a Gigabit Ethernet network to a testbed PC with a 300GB Western Digital Velociraptor hard drive. We run Intel's NAS Performance Toolkit, which determines how the NAS device performs when streaming 720p high-definition media from the device as well as the ability to record the same video while performing backup operations.
We also run two file transfer tests to see how the NAS device performs in real world scenarios. One file transfer test uses 3000 1MB files; this is intensive for both the hard drives and the embedded processor, and it provides a good indication of how the device will perform when backing up your computer. In addition, we transfer 20GB worth of 3-4GB files, a faster test that is similar to dealing with large videos, disk images or database files.
|Intel's NAS Performance Toolkit - HD Streaming|
|HD Playback (MBps)||HD Playback &
|HD Playback &|
|ASUS TS mini Home Server||$699||1TB||None||43.2||37.3||22.2|
|QNAP TS-210 Turbo NAS||$349||3TB||RAID 0||23.3||23.4||18.8|
|Synology DiskStation DS209+II||$515||3TB||RAID 0||45.2||44.7||34.9|
|QNAP TS-119 Turbo||$519||750GB||N/A||16.9||23.8||21.3|
|Linksys by Cisco Media Hub NMH305||$599.95||500GB||N/A||14.9||12.9||10.7|
|QNAP TS-219 Turbo||$659||3TB||RAID 0||25.5||28.1||22.6|
|HP EX490 MediaSmart Server||$749||1TB||None||36.5||35||15|
|QNAP TS-239 Pro Turbo||$799||3TB||RAID 0||41.6||42.3||28.3|
|Small File (3GB) Transfer Test Results|
|ASUS TS mini Home Server||$699||1TB||None||10.2||13.8||4.8|
|QNAP TS-210 Turbo NAS||$349||3TB||RAID 0||22.9||11.6||6.9|
|Synology DiskStation DS209+II||$515||3TB||RAID 0||38.9||29.7||12.8|
|QNAP TS-119 Turbo||$519||750GB||N/A||39.5||20.7||9.1|
|Linksys by Cisco Media Hub NMH305||$599.95||500GB||N/A||14.7||10.2||5.1|
|QNAP TS-219 Turbo||$659||3TB||RAID 0||30.6||17.8||9.9|
|HP EX490 MediaSmart Server||$749||1TB||None||22.9||19.5||10.4|
|QNAP TS-239 Pro Turbo||$799||3TB||RAID 0||44.1||34.5||10|
|Large File (20GB) Transfer Test Results|
|ASUS TS mini Home Server||$699||1TB||None||67.8||62||26.6|
|QNAP TS-210 Turbo NAS||$349||3TB||RAID 0||46.5||17.6||12.1|
|Synology DiskStation DS209+II||$515||3TB||RAID 0||64.9||40||22.7|
|QNAP TS-119 Turbo||$519||750GB||N/A||50.6||30.3||18.3|
|Linksys by Cisco Media Hub NMH305||$599.95||500GB||N/A||18.7||12.8||6.8|
|QNAP TS-219 Turbo||$659||3TB||RAID 0||67.1||31.5||19.6|
|HP EX490 MediaSmart Server||$749||1TB||None||41.5||51.1||13.3|
|QNAP TS-239 Pro Turbo||$799||3TB||RAID 0||67.6||70.8||33.9|
Though technically inhibited by low-powered components and a redundancy-based RAID configuration, the ASUS TS mini Home Server performed better in Intel's synthetic benchmark and large file benchmarks than most other one and two-bay NAS devices we’ve tested. It even fares better than HP's four-bay EX490 MediaSmart Server, which uses a Celeron processor, making the ASUS TS mini Home Server an apt choice for streaming media or handling image files across a Gigabit network.
However, when it comes to small files and folders the ASUS NAS device doesn't fare so well. Dismal results across all small file benchmarks — particularly simultaneous file transfers — shows that the NAS device doesn’t offer the fastest performance for manually backing up personal files.
The ASUS TS mini Home Server's performance shows that not all Windows-based NAS devices are slow. The impressive online storage platform and external hard drive manager also make it a better choice than similarly capable alternatives, although the lack of Mac and Linux support is a little disappointing.
Stay up to date with the latest news, reviews and features. Sign up to PC World’s newsletters
Follow PC World Australia on Twitter: @PCWorldAu
Latest News Articles
- Dell and Red Hat team to sell enterprise OpenStack
- Mozilla advises webmasters to implement X-Frame-Options security header
- Hacker sentenced to 18 months for peddling computer access to US national security lab
- SAP co-CEO to influence EU Internet taxation rules
- Cell phones on planes may be heading for the US, but will anyone use them?
Most Popular Articles
- 1 What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- 2 Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- 3 Windows 7 Home Premium vs. Windows 7 Professional
- 4 How do I connect my TV to the Internet?
- 5 Samsung’s 2013 Smart TVs: everything you need to know
GGG Evaluation Team
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
Best Deals on GoodGearGuide
Best Deals on PCWorld
- Printers & ScannersView all »
- NotebooksView all »
- TabletsView all »
- Mobile PhonesView all »
- Networking, Wireless & VoIPView all »