ATI Radeon HD 5450 (1GB) graphics card
The HD 5450 graphics card is available with both 512MB and 1GB of video memory
- Affordable price, DirectX 11 support, small and power efficent
- Performed poorly in our benchmarks, 64-bit memory bandwidth
The ATI Radeon HD 5450 is a reasonable option for home theatre PCs. It's also a dirt-cheap option if you're interested in DirectX 11. That said, there are other cards on the market that offer a better performance for the same price.
With the Radeon HD 5670 and HD 5450, ATI has moved its focus to the budget graphics card segment. This move hasn't been the best for ATI though, because as we saw with the HD 5670, it is the price-point that takes center-stage rather than the performance. As a result, at its current price, the HD 5450 is somewhat of a disappointment.
The HD 5450 is available with both 512MB and 1GB of video memory. It has a core that is clocked at 650MHz and a memory clock speed of 800MHz. Although it uses DDR3 RAM, its memory bandwidth has been limited to 64-bit, which is below par. Like the other 5000 series cards from ATI, the HD 5450 supports DirectX 11 and ATI's Eyefinity technology (that allows one card to output to multiple displays).
We got a reference card from ATI, so the design is sure to change in the hands of different manufacturers. The reference card had a small fan embedded in a heatsink over the core and three ports- VGA, HDMI and DVI. The card is slim and small and will fit into a regular cabinet without any issues. The card also does not require any additional power so there is no input port.
The card also has low power requirements -- 6.4 watts at idle and about 19 watts during regular usage. Owing to its small size, it runs silently and has no temperature issues. At full load in an open setup, the core temperature went up to 47 degrees while at idle it dropped to 35 degrees. All in all, the HD 5450 is perfectly designed to fit into an HTPC.
The stand-out feature of the HD 5450 is that it is the most inexpensive DirectX 11 card in the market. Unfortunately, that does not mean its performance is noteworthy. Overall, it is a card with one of the lowest performance scores that we've reviewed. In fact, its scores even fall short of the HD 4550.
Performance-wise, among ATI cards, we would put it between the HD 4350 and the HD 4550. In 3D Mark 2006, the HD 5450 returned a score of 3792. In 3D Mark Vantage's Entry preset, the score was 6916. The gaming benchmarks proved that the Radeon should not be considered if you want to play the latest games; even at low resolutions and settings. We tested the card using Crysis, Far Cry 2 and Tom Clancy's H.A.W.X and in all cases (except one) the frame-rates were unable to cross 20fps.
The ATI Radeon HD 5450 (1GB) is a fair product if you're looking for a card for your home theatre PC and a good one if you are especially concerned about DirectX 11. However, there are also other cards that we would recommend over it, including the HD 4550 and Nvidia's Geforce GT120. On the plus side, it's currently the cheapest way to get DX11 at your fingertips.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 2 Huawei Nova Plus smartphone review
- 3 Apple iPhone 7 Plus review: including Portrait Mode
- 4 Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- 5 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
Latest News Articles
- AMD will sneak-peek its high-end Zen CPU in December, starting a new CPU war
- 5 burning questions about AMD's Zen chip
- Nvidia tempts GeForce Experience 3.0 users with Gears of War 4 giveaway
- Intel's latest Xeon chips based on Skylake due next year
- Intel packs more horsepower in its monster 22-core processor
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- Time to ditch Foxtel and the iQ3: How to replace Foxtel packages with cheaper alternatives
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- FTBrand Marketing Manager - Premium Entertainment BrandNSW
- FTLife/400 Technical Business AnalystNSW
- TPSenior Test Analyst - DETEQLD
- FTSenior Project Manager - Permanent OpportunityNSW
- CCProject SchedulerQLD
- FTSenior Drupal DeveloperNSW
- CCReporting AnalystVIC
- FTFront End DeveloperVIC
- FTLevel 3 EngineerNSW
- FTLevel 3 Support ConsultantNSW
- FTTechnology Testing Services ManagerQLD
- FTLife/400 Developers / Programmers - Permanent - North Ryde areaNSW
- FTCheckpoint Firewall and VPNNSW
- FTIdentity Access + Security ConsultantSA
- FTBusiness Solutions SpecialistNSW
- TPPMO SchedulerNSW
- FTSolutions Architect - Data Centre/ NetworkQLD
- TPProject Manager - EnterpriseACT
- FTCheckpoint Firewall and VPNNSW
- FTTechnical Content CoordinatorVIC
- TPInfrastructure ArchitectVIC
- FTAndroid DeveloperNSW
- CCProject/ Operational CoordinatorNSW
- TPProject CoordintorVIC
- TPBusiness Analyst - DataQLD