Avira AntiVir Premium
Avira AntiVir Premium edition lacks behavioural detection
- Good disinfection, some good proactive detection
- Too-technical UI, Lacks behavioural detection
Avira AntiVir Premium Edition needs more features and a face-lift before it can become a top choice.
Price$ 25.46 (AUD)
Avira's AntiVir Premium Edition lacks an advanced malware detection feature used by top programs, and it could use a smoother interface. The program earned a seventh-place ranking in our current stand-alone antivirus roundup.
AntiVir proved capable at detecting known malware, detecting 99.3 percent of AV-Test.org's collection of more than half a million samples of Trojan horses, worms, spyware, and other kinds of malware. In past tests, that kind of showing would have earned a top rank in the category.
But in this roundup, the apps we tested proved so adept at detecting older, known malware that Avira's performance was only good enough for seventh place for traditional malware detection. AntiVir's relative performance was stronger in important heuristic tests, which use 2-week-old databases and newer malware to simulate how well antivirus apps can detect new malware that doesn't yet have a signature. Its 69.2 percent block rate earned it a number two spot, second only to G-Data Antivirus.
AntiVir can scan both Web and e-mail traffic (though not IM traffic, or for browser-tracking cookies) to catch potential attacks before they make it to your hard drive, but the program doesn't yet have the ability to catch malware based solely on what it does (known as behavioral detection, or behavioral analysis). This last line of defense is important for catching brand-new malware that can evade a signature-based defense, and while Avira says the feature is in testing for its standalone app, you'll have to do without it for now.
While Avira didn't earn a top spot for malware detections tests, when it came to scan speed the program played second-fiddle to none. Its 14.8MB-per-second throughput rate for automatic scans (these kick off when files are altered, for example) was matched only by Avast in speed tests. The program was similarly strong when it came to dealing with rootkits, stealth malware used to hide other malware on a PC--but so were many of the apps we tested. It detected all the rootkits and removed all but one--not bad, but four of the programs we tested cleaned up all of the rootkit infections.
In disinfection tests AntiVir proved capable at detecting and disabling existing infections, and it removed all the active malware files for all ten test infections. However, it left behind less-important files or failed to reverse system changes in all but one of the infections.
Double-clicking a system tray icon to open the app provides quick access to a straightforward status display, with links for performing an update or scan. But if you want to dig into any of the program's settings, you'll almost certainly have to go beyond the bare-bones standard settings display and opt for the expert mode. And when the app detects a threat, you'll wish you were an expert when faced with as many as seven different choices in the warning pop-up.
When Avira's AntiVir adds behavioural detection, and ideally an updated user interface and warning pop-ups, it may become a better option. Until then, you're likely better off with other products.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 2 Huawei Nova Plus smartphone review
- 3 Apple iPhone 7 Plus review: including Portrait Mode
- 4 Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- 5 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
Latest News Articles
- Judge paves the way for British hacker's extradition to US
- FBI faces lawsuit because it's stayed mum on iPhone 5c hack
- Early iPhone 7 reviews: You'll miss the headphone jack, but the camera and battery life are tops
- Toshiba's new SSD line features rock-bottom pricing
- Watch out: iOS 10 install is reportedly bricking some iPhones
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- FTBrand Marketing Manager - Premium Entertainment BrandNSW
- FTSystem AdministratorNSW
- FTFront End DeveloperVIC
- FTIT Field EngineerNSW
- TPJava DeveloperSA
- CCSolution Delivery Manager / Project ManagerNSW
- FTLevel 2 Help Desk SupportQLD
- FTInfrastructure Solution ArchitectSA
- CCIT Support AnalystVIC
- CCBusiness Analyst Finance & LendingQLD
- TPIDAM ArchitectVIC
- CCFront End DeveloperNSW
- CCSenior Test AnalystQLD
- CCICT Contracts ManagerSA
- FTSenior .Net DeveloperVIC
- FTMicrosoft Dynamics AX Finance ConsultantNSW
- FTBusiness Intelligence ConsultantNSW
- CCTechnical WriterQLD
- CCMicrosoft Devops Engineers - contract - SydneyNSW
- TPTechnical Solutions Architect-Dynamics CRMVIC
- FTTest Analyst - HealthcareVIC
- FTIT Field EngineerNSW
- FTCheckpoint Firewall and VPNNSW
- CCFIS Connex DeveloperQLD