BenQ Australia G2200W
Not much to get excited about.
- Unimposing design, relatively inexpensive
- Poor response rate, unsatisfactory black levels, backlight bleeding, disappointing presets
Although the G2200W is cheap for a 22in monitor, you don’t get much for the price. Poor black levels and backlight bleeding make for an unimpressive monitor, though for occasional use it may prove useful.
Price$ 299.00 (AUD)
There’s nothing really outstanding about BenQ’s G2200W. For a standard price, you get a standard monitor with a number of shortcomings sure to deter those looking for premium quality.
The G2200W shares many of the common traits of 22in monitors, with a native resolution of 1680x1050 pixels and a 5ms response rate — good enough for most uses, though fast motion movies and games may suffer. The monitor’s 1000:1 contrast ratio pales in comparison to competing units like ASUS’ LS221H, though it does have a dynamic contrast ratio of 2500:1. Connectivity is limited to standard D-Sub and DVI connections.
The G2200W doesn’t break from the crowd too much in terms of style, with a matte black bezel. The monitor sports a grill-textured separation at the bottom for a slight design twist which seems a little too reminiscent of the '90s for our liking.
With no possibility for height adjustment or horizontal tilting, the G2200W’s physical adjustment is restricted to vertical tilting. This may suffice if the monitor can be placed in the desired position but it is potentially quite troublesome. Viewing angles are adequate at a standard 160 degrees horizontally. BenQ says that the monitor is capable of 160 degrees vertical viewing angle as well, but as with most 22in monitors vertical tilting causes colours to become severely washed out.
Default settings on the G2200W are biased towards a blueish hue, so some calibration is required. Thankfully, the monitor’s adjustment buttons make configuration and personalisation an uncomplicated process. The on-screen display provides configuration options for brightness, contrast, colour and picture mode.
Along with a user mode, the G2200W provides four different picture presets, including an sRGB setting. BenQ also provides its own Senseye technology which provides a side-by-side comparison between the sRGB colour scheme and the presets; unfortunately there’s no way to compare sRGB settings with the personalised configuration. We found all four presets unsatisfactory for everyday use, as they proved to be dull and inaccurate. Still, even after altering the settings manually, the G2200W was underwhelming.
Running the monitor through a bevy of DisplayMate Video Edition tests, the G2200W was fairly average. Colours are vibrant with no obvious inaccuracies. Lines and edges are clearly defined and well-rendered, though poor brightness levels causes detail to quickly disappear from darker areas.
Black levels are somewhat disappointing regardless of contrast setting. Backlight bleeding also occurs, though this isn’t too noticeable and shouldn’t prove an obstacle during everyday use.
The G2200W’s shortcomings were immediately apparent during testing. Transitioning from windowed video to full screen caused the display to stutter, with aberrations visible during this transition. Text rendering is adequate, though using the monitor’s integrated presets quickly caused text to become unreadable due to high contrast and ghosting.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 2 Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- 3 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
- 4 Apple iPhone 7 Plus review: including Portrait Mode
- 5 MSI GS70 laptop review
Latest News Articles
- Dell's monstrous 70-inch touchscreen monitor takes aim at Microsoft's Surface Hub
- Dell's 4-screen multimonitor setup looks like one enormous 43-inch display
- R.I.P. VGA: Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1080 dumps analog support, following Intel and AMD's lead
- CES 2016: Top 10 trends
- Kogan forced to pay $32,400 penalty by ACCC
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- FTEnd Point Security AdministratorACT
- CCPSCD/ CRM Business/Financial AnalystsACT
- FTFront End Developer - Team LeadNSW
- FTService Lifecycle Management Contract AdministratorVIC
- CCSenior Platform Developer/ArchitectNSW
- TPFull Stack Web DeveloperNSW
- FTSoftware Developer - LMSNSW
- CCHadoop DeveloperSA
- CCChange AnalystNSW
- FTClient Service AdministratorNSW
- CCTest EngineerQLD
- CCDevelopment Lead - JavaNSW
- CCChange & Release AdministratorNSW
- FTTraining CoordinatorNSW
- FTSenior Technical LeadNSW
- PTService Desk AnalystVIC
- CCNetwork AnalystNSW
- CCAdobe AEM DeveloperVIC
- TPXamarin DeveloperQLD
- TPProject Manager - SAPQLD
- FTSenior Consultant/ArchitectNSW
- FTERP Support ConsultantQLD
- CCConsumer Social Specialist (Digital)VIC
- FT2nd Line Engineer - CitrixVIC
- PTProject ManagersACT