Dell Studio XPS 8100 desktop PC
This Dell PC has the grunt to handle everyday computing with ease
- Reasonable price tag, impressive performance for general usage, 64-bit Windows 7 as standard
- Choosing more powerful components quickly drives up the price, no monitor included in base bundle
The Dell Studio XPS 8100 is a well-priced, mid-range desktop PC for home usage. It doesn't have the strongest specifications -- you'll have to pay significantly to add extra performance through Dell's customisation options -- but it will handle almost all home computing tasks with ease.
Price$ 1,399.00 (AUD)
The Dell Studio XPS 8100 is a mid-range, all-purpose PC aimed at home users. It has a Core i5-650 processor, 4GB of DDR3 RAM, 1TB of hard drive space and an NVIDIA GTS 240 graphics card as standard. Dell’s site allows you to customise the system’s specifications to your taste, although adding extra power is an expensive proposition.
'Studio XPS' is engraved into the side panels of the Dell Studio XPS 8100.
Dell Studio XPS 8100: Design and specifications
The Dell Studio XPS 8100 is quite attractive for a desktop computer. Although the chassis is beige, it’s a far cry from the boring and bland desktop towers of the past. A glossy black, smooth front lends a sense of quality to the tower. Card slots are arranged on the front panel along with a hidden DVD-RW drive and two USB ports behind a sliding panel. An additional two USB ports can be found, along with headphone and microphone jacks, in a recessed section on the Dell Studio XPS 8100’s top panel.
Our review unit used an Intel Core i5-650 dual-core processor clocked at 3.2GHz. It had the standard configuration of 4GB of DDR3 RAM and two 500GB hard drives in a RAID 1 configuration. Its GeForce 310 video card isn't one that is offered on Dell's Web site, and it's significantly less powerful than the GeForce GTS 240 that the XPS 8100 will ship with, not to mention the optional GeForce GTX 260 video card. No monitor is included in the base $1399 bundle, so you’ll need to shell out a few dollars more unless you already have one handy.
The Dell Studio XPS 8100 has two front-mounted USB ports behind a sliding door.
Adding more powerful components does drive the price up quickly. When we opted to customise a Dell Studio XPS 8100 system build on Dell’s Web site with a Core i7-860 processor over the standard Core i5, 8GB of RAM instead of 4GB and a 23in monitor, the price jumped from its $1399 base to $1969.
Two more USB ports and headphone/microphone jacks can be found on the Dell Studio XPS 8100's top panel.
Dell Studio XPS 8100: Performance benchmarks
As a mid-range system, the Dell Studio XPS 8100 does not have the raw number-crunching power of an Intel Core i7-based desktop PC. Its Core i5 processor is more powerful for most tasks than slightly older Intel Core 2 Duo high-end CPUs, though. We compared it to some consumer and businesses desktops to gauge its performance. Our Studio XPS 8100 came with Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit preinstalled, so it could make full use of its 4GB of DDR3 RAM — a 32-bit operating system would not be able to utilise all of the system’s memory.
|Price||WorldBench 6||iTunes Encoding
|Dell Studio XPS 8100/td>||$1399||n/a||53s||46s|
|Dell Precision T1500||$2922||n/a||45s||26s|
|HP Pavilion Elite HPE-190a||$2799||141||49s||34s|
|Dell Studio XPS 8000||$1999||124||52s||36s|
|Acer Aspire M7720||$3699||104||1m 1s||24s|
|Acer Aspire Predator G7770||$4900.11||103||60s||35s|
|Altech NRG Storm||$4999||103||38s||22s|
The Dell Studio XPS 8100’s performance is similar to the XPS 8000 we reviewed in November last year. It recorded a very similar iTunes result to the XPS 8000 when encoding 53min of WAV files to 192kbps MP3. But it recorded a slower time in the Blender 3D test. The Blender test can be scaled depending on how many CPU cores you have, so the extra physical cores in the XPS 8000 system are responsible for the 10sec difference in performance. As for 3D performance, with a GeForce GTS 240 or GTX 260 graphics card the Studio XPS 8100 should have plenty of grunt to play most recent PC games at a moderate resolution and detail level.
As a mid-range, all-purpose desktop computer, the Dell Studio XPS 8100 provides more than acceptable performance figures. It’s not especially expensive in its standard configuration, although if you want to add in more powerful components the price rises dramatically. If you’re looking for a PC that’s got enough power for your family’s needs — whether it's Web browsing, music, a bit of video editing or some light gaming — the Dell Studio XPS 8100 will do the job.
Become a fan of PC World Australia on Facebook
Follow PC World Australia on Twitter: @PCWorldAu
Stay up to date with the latest news, reviews and features. Sign up to PC World’s newsletters
Join the PC World newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 2 Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- 3 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
- 4 Apple iPhone 7 Plus review: including Portrait Mode
- 5 MSI GS70 laptop review
Latest News Articles
- Samsung's UHD Monitor covers 99.5 per cent of Adobe colour spectrum
- HP settles cases with inkjet cartridge vendors
- Study predicts PS3 will win the console war
- Samsung wave makes a splash at Mobile World Congress
- Sony returns to profit, cuts full-year loss forecast
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- TV of the year award 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- CCProject Manager - Procurement System ImplementationACT
- FTWinforms Developer - European Integration ProgramNSW
- CCIngres DeveloperSA
- FTBusiness Systems Analyst/Salesforce Developer APEXNSW
- FTInformation Management and Data Services ManagerVIC
- TPBusiness Analyst | HealthQLD
- CCJava Developer/ Web DesginerNSW
- FTBusiness Analyst - SQLNSW
- FT.Net & Oracle Developers - Agile, Digital/ Portal DevelopmentNSW
- FTTest AnalystVIC
- TPSenior Business AnalystQLD
- TPSolution ArchitectQLD
- CCWeb Designer or Visual Interactional DesignerVIC
- FTStorage EngineerSA
- FTSenior Reporting Data Analyst - TelcoVIC
- CCTest Lead : Perth BasedNSW
- CCSenior Python DeveloperNSW
- CCDesktop/Laptop Deployment TechnicianVIC
- CCEmail Production SpecialistQLD
- CCSystem EngineerVIC
- TPUAT LeadQLD
- CCFunctional SAP IS Specialist (Logistics / Retail)ACT
- FTService Lifecycle RepresentativeQLD
- CCProject Engineer (Microwave)NSW
- CCSAP HR Functional ConsultantQLD