Dell UltraSharp 2405FPW
- Good image quality, lots of inputs
- Poor motion display
The Dell 2405PCW includes great still-image quality and several entertainment inputs at a category-busting price.
Price$ 1,440.00 (AUD)
At its native wide-screen resolution of 1920 x 1200 pixels, the Dell 2405FPW showed remarkable colour and clarity. On test screens, text looked sharp, and images looked crisp and saturated. The 24" wide screen performed particularly well on our Web page test screen, displaying highly legible text and subtle distinctions in shading. On the other hand, the brightness--specified by the vendor at 500 nits (units of luminance)--seemed excessive at the monitor's default settings, causing our test screen of a brilliantly collared fruit to look a little washed out.
Dell sensibly placed two of the monitor's four USB 2.0 ports on the left-hand side of the bezel, where they're readily accessible. The 2405FPW's nine-in-one media-card reader, situated next to the bezel-mounted ports, would be a boon for a digital photographer.
The 2405FPW includes height, pivot, swivel and tilt adjustments for comfortable viewing. It doesn't come with pivoting software, however.
The Dell's numerous inputs should endear it to entertainment-minded buyers. The 2405FPW accepts not only analog and digital output from a PC, but also composite, component and S-Video from consumer electronic devices such as DVD players and camcorders. Each input is clearly labelled and numbered on the back, and the corresponding numbers on the front bezel light up as you select the input.
The existence of inputs does not translate into excellent output, however. When we played our test DVD movie through our PC's digital output, the 2405FPW showed fuzzy images and somewhat dull colours. When we connected a high-quality DVD player to the monitor via its component inputs, the colours improved, but the image still lacked crispness. Details did look impressive in dark areas, though, particularly in the highlights on a black velvet cloak.
Dell rates the 2405FPW's response time at 12 milliseconds, which is its intergrey (or grey-to-grey) response time; its rise-and-fall (or black-to-white) response time is 16 milliseconds. These match the response time specs of the ViewSonic VP231wb.
Overall, moving images looked best when played at small size in a picture-in-picture window. Despite the appeal of this 24" wide-screen monitor for office tasks, it won't replace a TV for full-screen DVD viewing.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 2 Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- 3 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
- 4 Apple iPhone 7 Plus review: including Portrait Mode
- 5 MSI GS70 laptop review
Latest News Articles
- Dell's monstrous 70-inch touchscreen monitor takes aim at Microsoft's Surface Hub
- Dell's 4-screen multimonitor setup looks like one enormous 43-inch display
- R.I.P. VGA: Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1080 dumps analog support, following Intel and AMD's lead
- CES 2016: Top 10 trends
- Kogan forced to pay $32,400 penalty by ACCC
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- CCMainframe Developer (with ASP.NET)NSW
- CCSolution Designer and DeveloperNSW
- FTProduct Designer - UIVIC
- FTSenior Project Manager / Program ManagerNSW
- CCWeb DeveloperVIC
- FTPrincipal Product Manager | Cloud | Managed ServicesNSW
- FTEnterprise Architect - BusinessQLD
- CCCX Program LeadNSW
- FTDevelopment Manager / Engineering Manager - Canberra RoleACT
- CCDeveloper - Tag managementNSW
- FTSenior UX DesignerVIC
- FTSenior Front End DeveloperNSW
- PTService Desk AnalystVIC
- CCApplication Specialist (Cerner) - Brisbane BasedNSW
- TPProject Manager - HealthQLD
- CCFacilities Coordinator - Multiple RolesVIC
- FTManager Integration PlanningNSW
- CCSenior Integration DeveloperSA
- FTRF EngineerNSW
- FTNode.js/API DeveloperNSW
- TPBusiness Improvement and Change ManagerQLD
- FTSystem Engineer - VirtulisationNSW
- FTHadoop DeveloperVIC
- CCSME Senior Financial Planner - MelbourneNSW
- CCUNISON Analyst Programmer (Contract) FinanceNSW