2016 Ford Mustang EcoBoost review
Like driving an actual Mustang horse
- Goes fast in a straight line in the dry
- Hates the wet
- Doesn't like going round corners
Thrilling and terrifying like driving an actual Mustang horse
Price$ 50,000.00 (AUD)
Who loves this car?
Absolutely everyone loves this car. The kids love it. Ms. 3 said, “I like red, horsey car.” The neighbours all came out to look and point at it and ask for rides. The wives love this car, the guys love this car. We simply didn’t hear anything other than gushing about it. Looks from bystanders and van drivers at traffic lights were nods of approval if anything. There wasn’t a single wanker comment.
Is the car sexy?
In short, yes. We took our test lady-of-leisure out for a spin and she told us how much she's always loved Mustangs. So where in the car would she prefer to get frisky? After a slight pause and a cock of the head, we were given a resolute, “On the hood.” Others have since pointed out that, in America, Mustangs seem to be exclusively driven by middle-aged women, perhaps this should underline that the 2016 Mustang scores the highest sex-appeal rating that a car can - V8 version or not.
What about family types?
We fitted a toddler seat and a baby capsule in the back. This car will almost-comfortably fit four, but not if they all have long legs.
2.3l Ford EcoBoost inline-four cylinder - 305 Horsepower (227kW).
What’s it like to drive?
A thrilling nightmare. In a straight line, in the dry, this car will put a smile on anyone’s face: it takes off fast and keeps on getting fast. But there are issues. On a mildly damp day, we damn lost the back end twice, just pulling away gently up a mild hill. On the second occasion snow/wet mode was engaged. From that point on, any desire to throw it around roundabouts and corners became an exercise in sphincter-tightening to the point where we really didn’t want to have the kids in the back for long journeys lest they be thrown out after the inevitable crash. Keyboard-wielding stunt drivers will scoff at this, but quite simply, getting anywhere near the edge of this car’s capabilities will be a fraught exercise for most normal people. It’s like driving an actual mustang horse. This is the epitome of stereotypical ‘Murican muscle car with all that comes with it. Here’s a video of one crashing while going in a straight line.
As for tootling around town, our main issue was having difficulty seeing the speedometer. The dial is obscured by the steering wheel from most angles. It just meant that in “safety cam"-rich areas looking to see how fast you were going could be quite an unsafe business.
In manual flappy-paddle mode, it's near undriveable unless you're already at speed. Accelerating from stand still while shifting from first to third will likely give you whiplash unless you're actually moving off the start line in a proper race.
On a scale of car sounds which ranges from zero to the 1968 Mustang GT Fastback from Bullitt, this sounds like sadness and disappointment. At first. However, the performance that Ford has eked out of this four-cylinder engine deserves some serious respect. After our initial disappointment the mild, high-pitched whine started to put us in mind of the Millennium Falcon taking off. It’s a stretch. But it’s a comforting thought.
For a performance car this cheap, suspicions were raised. The leather seats are comfy while the important flashy switches all feel decent enough. There’s a great deal of plastic trim, though and some of the panels feel cheap, but as we saw with its admirers, absolutely everyone looks past that. This thing has got it where it counts.
That’s except for the flappy paddle manual gear changers. Gear shifters are regularly tactile things of beauty, instruments that connect flesh with machine in the most visceral way. Some particularly impressive examples can be seen here. Ford, however, has served up the design equivalent of Blues Point Tower. Perhaps they are trying to discourage people from using them which, frankly, is a good idea (see above).
The touch-screen display and accoutrements worked quite well and even the Voice Control understood what we said. However, this merely elevates it into ‘second rate’ bracket – the sooner all cars start using Android and Apple car software the better frankly – and we’ll keep saying that until we see an interface and screen that comes close to matching what a
Cruise control is adaptive meaning that it will match the gap with the car in front and automatically slow down when it does. The wipers are also automatic. Front seats are heated and cooled. Reversing camera is included.
Expect to be getting around 16l/100KM (stated is 8.5 – 13.1). You can drive it more economically, but this is a Mustang. Why would you? Note however, that the EcoBoost version comes with thinner rear tyres than the V8 GT version. We feel this is a mistake not just for basic safety and performance reasons but because they spin up almost every time you pull away slightly-friskily. Rear tyres should probably be counted as a consumable. Front tyres, less so – they don’t seem to do much beyond keep the nose off the ground.
Fastback EcoBoost $50,000. Fastback EcoBoost Convertible $60,000 (our review model). GT Convertible $72,700.
Would I have it instead of a $10,000, 10-year-old Subaru Forester?Read more: Subaru Liberty 3.6R 2016 review
No. I loved the Mustang. But not driving it for any purpose other than showing off. There are a few scattered around my neighbourhood now and I like looking at them. But that Forester sticks to the road (sealed and unsealed) meaning it goes round corners much faster. It also feels much safer for the fam. The Forester is slower off the mark and infinitely duller-looking, but for practical car ownership reasons… just no.
Everyone loves this car, but driving one is the car equivalent of driving an actual mustang horse.
- US probes Tesla on autopilot system failures after fatal crash
- Honda's new motor for hybrid cars is a very big deal
- Fiat Chrysler launches bug bounty program for connected vehicles
- Tesla admits Autopilot was on during latest Model X accident
- Solar Impulse 2 is one flight away from circling the globe on no fuel
- Ford commits to Apple CarPlay, offering it with SYNC 3 for all 2017 vehicles
- Alphabet will work with more auto makers on self-driving cars
- Ford to offer self-driving cars without steering wheels by 2021
- Volkswagen is founding a new cybersecurity firm to prevent car hacking
- Self-driving Ubers are now arriving in Pittsburgh
- Tesla ratchets up fully autonomous cars; watchdog group wants tighter safety regs
- Nissan, Renault tout plans to make 10 autonomous vehicles by 2020
- Self-driving 18-wheeler delivers the first shipment: Beer
Join the PC World newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 2 Huawei Nova Plus smartphone review
- 3 Apple iPhone 7 Plus review: including Portrait Mode
- 4 Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- 5 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
Latest News Articles
- Here's how much Tesla will require EV owners to pay to charge up
- INU is a pricey personal scooter for the urban consumer
- Nikola Motor unveils its hydrogen fuel cell 18-wheeler
- Apple offers views on automated car policy, but cagey about its plans
- Report: Intel plans to make the Core i7 the brains behind self-driving cars
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- FTBrand Marketing Manager - Premium Entertainment BrandNSW
- TPICT - Contracts and Commercial AnalystQLD
- CCAAA DeveloperNSW
- CCSCRUM MasterVIC
- FTCheckpoint Firewall and VPNNSW
- TPSenior Business Analyst - Risk & ComplianceNSW
- FTTechnical Business AnalystVIC
- FTJava DeveloperSA
- CCSenior Technical Specialist - AIXVIC
- FTLevel 2 Service DeskNSW
- FTFront End DeveloperNSW
- TPProgram ManagerNSW
- FTSenior .Net DeveloperVIC
- FTMedia Architect/LeadNSW
- FTProject Manager (Software product development)VIC
- FTFull Stack PHP DevelopersQLD
- FTIT Field EngineerNSW
- CCFIS Connex DeveloperQLD
- CCWebMethod DeveloperVIC
- CCTechnology Support Specialist - Multiple RolesSA
- TPLearning/Instructional DesignerQLD
- CCSenior Business AnalystNSW
- FTITCM EngineerNSW
- CCDigital Business Analyst l SalesforceNSW