GE PJ1 digital camera and projector

GE PJ1 review: This is a poor quality camera with a built-in pico projector that's not very useful

  • Review
  • Specs
  • Images
  • User Reviews
  • Buy Now
GE PJ1
  • GE PJ1
  • GE PJ1
  • GE PJ1

Pros

  • Easy to operate

Cons

  • Poor image quality
  • Poor projection quality

Bottom Line

The GE PJ1 isn't a good product. Its camera is of poor quality and its projector isn't very useful. If you want a camera with a built-in projector, you're better off checking out Nikon's offering, which is actually a decent camera.

Would you buy this?

Poor quality aside, the PJ1 is easy to operate. You don't have to do much other than change shooting mode, choose whether you want to use the flash and play with the zoom. There are scene modes that you can switch to, but there is also an automatic scene mode that selects the scene for you. It's a reasonably comfortable camera to use, but its buttons feel cheap. The camera lacks a lens cover, which leaves the plastic in front of the lens prone to getting dirty; you have to remember to check it prior to using the camera, just in case it has been accidentally smudged in your carry bag.

Because the projector sits in the centre of the camera, the lens resides at the top-left corner position (from the way you hold the camera) which means that it's too easy for your fingers to obstruct the lens while taking photos. The projector lens is attached to a slider that sits at the top of the camera and this can be used to adjust its focus.

To use the PJ1 as a projector for displaying your photos, you simply press the projector button next that sits next to the shutter button. It's not of great quality, and we didn't expect it to be, but it wasn't as good as the projector in Nikon's S1100pj. With a 15 ANSI Lumens brightness rating, it's not a very bright projector, which means that to get the best results you have to project in an almost pitch-black room and from a close wall distance. It can project an image that is 120x90mm from 2.3m away and an image of 44x33cm from 90cm away. The closer distance gives you better detail, but that's not saying much because the projector's clarity is poor overall.

A dock ships with the camera and this can be used as a cooler while projecting for long periods of time. It has a built-in fan, which makes a sharp whirring sound while it's operating. A mess of cables is supplied for charging the camera and also for connecting it to the dock and to a computer. You don't get a separate charger for the battery, so you have to always use the supplied cables to connect the camera and charge it. It's a great solution if you like solving puzzles.

The PJ1's ability to project an entire computer screen is perhaps its best trait. You have to connect the camera to your computer using the supplied USB cable, and you have to install the supplied PC to Link software and click 'Start Capture'. The projector will then display the contents of your screen exactly as they appear on your monitor, except with much less clarity. Wether you project from a short distance or a long distance; whether you use the lowest supported resolution of your computer or not, text will not be easily legible and photos, graphs and charts will not look properly defined. The other problem is that the USB cable that is supplied with the camera is too short to allow for comfortable usage — you have to sit your laptop in front of the wall that you will be projecting on to. If you want a portable projector for business use, then consider a product such as the HP Notebook Projection Companion or Acer Projector C20 instead.

All up, the GE PJ1 is a novel product, but it's not very useful. It doesn't excel as a camera, and it certainly doesn't excel as a projector. For business presentations, you're better off having people crowd around your laptop rather than trying to use the projector; the only time the projector may be of use is when showing just-taken pictures to more than a handful of people at a time. But even then the clarity of the images won't be good.

Become a fan of PC World Australia on Facebook

Follow PC World Australia on Twitter: @PCWorldAu

Stay up to date with the latest news, reviews and features. Sign up to PC World’s newsletters

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Shirley E. Hardy

1

I actually bought this camera and I regret it. I've been using this camera for about 6 months now and I also agree it is a poor quality camera. The only good thing about this camera is it takes somewhat nice closeup photos of objects. Things like flowers, kitchen taps, feathers, containers, etc. But smaller objects like tiny Allysum flowers, ants, small native bees, etc the camera refuses to focus on these tiny objects. The camera hates taking photos or videos when it's overcast, raining, or of anything up in a tree. It refuses to focus on water droplets that are not taken from above. If you have to point this camera upward to take a photo of something, forget it. I would not recommend this camera if you want to take bird photographs, as I do.

However, there is one advantage to this camera's video mode, and is what I mostly use my camera for. The audio sounds it picks up, say of a Superb Fairy Wren, is recorded exactly as you hear it - that is if a bird is calling out in a high pitch and is within about 400 metres from the camera. Beyond that distance sounds recorded sound extremely distant when a video is played back in the camera itself. The video mode will not pick up any sounds that are close to and more than 1 kilometre away. Nor will it record low pitch sounds like those made by some Herons, Ibises and Owls unless you get within feet of the source of the sound.

When using the "scene mode", for example, sunset photos that you take are not true to life coloured images. The images you take display too much yellow coloured light instead of orange or pink in sunsets. The other scene modes come out poorly using those modes.

Mikaela Andrea with my sister Mariela Angela

2

When I first saw this camera, I knew this is the answer to all my financial problems.
I was amazed with its projector capability. I projected a vision that I can used this type of camera to make money. In my business, I used a different type of projector that is so hard to operate.
So, when the time I saw the camera at the camera store, I didn't think twice... I bought it right away and excited.
What is my business? Secret... I'm Just happy I have this kind of camera. I hope someday, there'll be PJ2,,, Thank you so much PJ1.

Post new comment

Users posting comments agree to the PC World comments policy.

Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?