Gigabyte GeForce 7900 GTX (GV-NX79X512DB-RH-ED)
- Great performance
- Value for money
Although this card is expensive, it's still an excellent component for any enthusiast's computer. If price isn't so much of an issue, but enough to not warrant purchasing an 8800, this may very well suit your needs.
Price$ 639.00 (AUD)
Until very recently the 7900 GTX was NVIDIA's flagship model, rivalling ATI's own flagship model the Radeon X1900XTX in a head-to-head battle to capture the hearts of today's extreme gamers. However, despite the fact that both these cards are now overshadowed by the monster NVIDIA 8800 with its DirectX 10 capabilities and unified architecture, unless you're hoping to make Windows Vista look that little bit prettier, there's very little currently in the gaming world that will push a graphics card to do more than the 7900 GTX can.
Unfortunately though, this may not make it a sensible card to purchase for the long term. It may be $300-$400 cheaper than the latest and greatest technology and run every game currently available, but at $639, it's still a hefty layout for most people. You might be better to opt for something a little less costly while you wait for a more affordable card from NVIDIA's G80 GPU range, or wait and see what ATI comes out with using their expected R600 chip. NVIDIA seemed to be trying to offload some of their excess G71 GPUs at a lower price recently with the 7900 GTO, potentially because of this no-mans-land price bracket they've created between the low to mid-range 7900 cards and their new 8800 cards.
All that said, this is still a potent piece of hardware and deserves some respect. The G71 chip, also known as the 7900 chip was the pinnacle of NVIDIA's graphics card technology for most of 2006, until the 8800s hit the scene. The board itself is quite large and the fan and heatsink that cools it fattens the board out to around two PCI slots in width, so keep this in mind when considering your other hardware. Gigabyte often adds its own touches to the boards they manufacture, such as changing the fan or heatsink and changing the capacitors, but this particular sample appears to be in line with the standard NVIDIA specifications. Unlike its key rival, the Radeon X1900XTX, the 7900 GTX operates at bearable noise levels, even with the standard fan which remains cooler over extended periods.
Although the 7900 chip has been used on a number of different cards, the 7900 GTX boasts the highest specifications. The core clock speed comes in at an impressive 650MHz, 200MHz faster than the 7900GT and comes packed with twice as much video RAM as the GT, utilising 512MB of GDDR3 RAM clocked at 800MHz (1600MHz). Although ATI's cards are more heavily geared towards shading processors, the 24 pixel pipelines and 8 vertex shaders in the 7900 GTX should happily suffice for most games available now.
We ran it through our normal benchmarks to see how it performed. In 3DMark 2006 on our test bed it scored 4487. Generally speaking that's plenty for most games based on the rest of the components in the test bed we used. In FEAR's in-game benchmark, with a resolution of 1280x960 at full quality settings, including 8x AA (antialiasing) and 16x AF (anisotropic filtering), it averaged 64fps (frames per second), a comfortable rate for smooth gaming. We also put it through Quake 4 on high quality settings, including 4x AA with a resolution of 1280 x 1024 in which it scored an average of 75fps. One thing that NVIDIA cards are lacking in the 7900 chip generation is the ability to process high dynamic range (HDR) lighting with AA turned on. This could become a problem as games, such as those based on the Half-Life 2 engine begin to utilise this feature more and more.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Samsung portable 1TB T3 drive
UE Boom 2 Bluetooth speaker
Epson EcoTank Expression ET-2500
Microsoft L5V-00027 Sculpt Ergonomic Keyboard Desktop
Smart LED Bulb LB130
Lexar® JumpDrive® S57 USB 3.0 flash drive
Everki ContemPRO Roll Top Laptop Backpack
Huawei Mate 9
Lexar® JumpDrive® S45 USB 3.0 flash drive
3SIXT Ultra HD Sports Action Camera
Google Daydream VR headset
Logitech G403 Prodigy mouse
Belkin MIXIT Metallic Lightning to USB Cable
Lexar® Portable SSD
Acer Swift 7
HD Pan/Tilt Wi-Fi Camera with Night Vision NC450
Blade 28 backpack by Arc’teryx
Lexar® JumpDrive® C20c USB Type-C flash drive
Audio-Technica ATH-ANC70 Noise Cancelling Headphones
Lexar® Professional 1800x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards
Garmin Fenix Chronos smartwatch
Dell XPS 13 laptop
HP Pavilion x360 13”
Dell Inspiron 5000 series 2-in-1
Surface Pro 4
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Huawei Mate 9 full in-depth smartphone review
- 2 ZTE Axon 7 review: Is ZTE dumping old stock on Australia?
- 3 Oppo R9s smartphone full review
- 4 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 5 Huawei Nova Plus smartphone review
Latest News Articles
- PC prices will continue to go up due to shortage of components
- Radeon Vega vs. GeForce GTX 1080 Ti? AMD, Nvidia announce dueling events at GDC 2017
- Toshiba's in chaos, but not quitting PCs -- yet
- Intel's 8th-gen 'Coffee Lake' chips reuse 14nm process as other Core CPUs ease into new tech
- Intel researches tech to prepare for a future beyond today's PCs
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- How to quit Pokemon Go (or to start enjoying it again)
- Huawei Mate 9 full in-depth smartphone review
- Time to ditch Foxtel and the iQ3: How to replace Foxtel packages with cheaper alternatives
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- TPSenior Business AnalystQLD
- CCLevel 2 Helpdesk Support (CISCO)QLD
- CCTechnical Consultant - ITSM/HP Service ManagerNSW
- TPIT Project Manager - Office relocationVIC
- CCTest AnalystQLD
- TP.Net DeveloperSA
- FTBranch Practice Manager - SecurityQLD
- TPHRIS Business AnalystQLD
- CCSenior Project Manager x 2QLD
- FTDatabase DeveloperACT
- TPProduct Owner - Cloud SolutionsQLD
- CCUser ResearcherNSW
- FTOracle Forms PL/SQL Analyst ProgrammerQLD
- FTIT Information Security AdvisorNSW
- TPBusiness Process Analyst (Newcaslte Based)NSW
- CCSenior Business Analyst - AgileQLD
- TPMobile DeveloperWA
- CCFirewall EngineerNSW
- CCSenior Networks Specialist - DNS PlatformVIC
- TPScrum MasterVIC
- CCSOA Oracle DeveloperNSW
- FTDynamics AX Functional Consultant (Manufacturing and Trade & Logistics Modules)VIC
- TPOrganisational Change Manager - ICT Services TransformationQLD
- TPAgile Project Manager. Sharepoint / PeoplesoftNSW
- CCCommercial Contract AdministratorACT