Gigabyte GeForce 9600GT 512MB (GV-NX96T512HP)
Passive cooling that packs a bite
- Factory overclocked for premium performance, effective passive cooling, 2D/3D clock separation, sound-free operation
- Some DX10-enabled games struggled at higher settings
The Gigabyte GeForce 9600GT 512MB (GV-NX96T512HP) is one of the best passively cooled graphics cards we've seen, offering plenty of tweaks over the 9600GT reference board. Its performance in our benchmarks easily matched the majority of its fan-equipped competitors, ensuring you don't need to compromise on power.
Price$ 239.00 (AUD)
The Gigabyte GeForce 9600GT 512MB (GV-NX96T512HP) is a noise-free graphics card equipped with one of NVIDIA's 9 series GPUs (graphics processing unit). With options for 2D/3D clock separation and a quartet of passive coolers, this model has been designed with power-efficiency in mind. While fans of maxed-out settings may not get the results they require from the latest DirectX 10-enabled games, most users will be sufficiently pleased with the card's overall performance. As far as mid-range offerings go, it will definitely deliver the goods.
This graphics card is passively cooled, which is perhaps its most intriguing drawcard. The top-mounted cooler is equipped with four heat pipes that have been split into separate pairs to optimise cooling. An arrangement of copper-equipped, aluminium fins dominate both sides of the cooler. The board also utilises natural convection within the chassis to disperse heat. During our gaming benchmarks, the GPU's temperature hovered around the 85-degree mark, which is slightly higher than a graphics card with active cooling. However, it's worth noting that the (GV-NX96T512HP) is a factory overclocked model, which naturally affects heating.
A neat touch introduced by Gigabyte for this card is the inclusion of separate 2D and 3D clock speeds. This allows the card to reduce its power consumption during 2D applications, such as word processing or e-mails. Naturally, the benefit will be diminished for users with Vista machines, due to Aero's flashy interface. Nevertheless, it remains a good feature.
As with every other card in the GeForce 9600GT series, the (GV-NX96T512HP) is built around NVIDIA's latest G94 GPU core. Very little has changed from the previous G92 chip (found on cards like the GeForce 8800 GT), with both processing units possessing the same basic architecture. Probably the most notable change is in the number of stream processors, which has dropped from 128 to just 64. While this may seem like a step backwards, it falls roughly in line with the 9600GT series' lower price point.
Being a factory overclocked edition, the (GV-NX96T512HP) has been extensively customised via Gigabyte's Turbo Force technology. Its core clock speed has been stepped up from 650MHz to 720MHz, while the memory clock speed now sits at 1008MHz (2016MHz effective). With its 256-bit bus, this works out to a maximum theoretical memory bandwidth of 64.5GBps. Its shader clock has also received a substantial boost, up from 1625MHz to 1800MHz. As you would expect, these performance-boosting tweaks had a positive effect on our gaming benchmarks when compared to the vanilla 9600GT design. We also noticed improvements over similar factory overclocked cards, such as Galaxy's 9600GT Overclocked.
In 3DMark06, the (GV-NX96T512HP) recorded an average of 11,177. This is a very impressive result and trumped our previous 9600GT record-holder, the Galaxy 9600GT (OC). (When we ran 3DMark06 using the same test bed, the Galaxy card returned a score of 10,956.)
The card performed equally well in the majority of our gaming tests. In the game F.E.A.R., it averaged 71 frames per second (fps) with maximum settings enabled. This was slightly higher than the Galaxy 9600GT (OC)'s result of 68fps. In Lost Planet: Extreme Conditions, both cards returned similar results, with the (GV-NX96T512HP) averaging slightly higher (84.5fps compared to 82fps).
In our DirectX 10 gaming tests, the (GV-NX96T512HP)'s performance took an expected dive, though it should still prove capable of running most games at acceptable frame rates. For instance, when we ran Lost Planet: Extreme Condition with maximum settings enabled, it returned an average result of 30.4fps. This is a perfectly playable speed and an improvement of 3fps over the Galaxy model. In the notoriously system-taxing Crysis, the card averaged 18.2fps. While this is disappointing, it is still an improvement over the Galaxy 9600GT (OC), which averaged just 16.6fps.
Like the rest of NVIDIA's 9600GT cards, the (GV-NX96T512HP) includes a HDMI adapter in the box and is HDCP compliant. This means that it will work with a high-definition player and screen; an important point if you want to use your PC as a media player. It also comes bundled with Gamer HUD, an optimisation tool that allows you to tweak the GPU, shader, and memory clock speeds for an extra boost in performance.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 2 Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- 3 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
- 4 Apple iPhone 7 Plus review: including Portrait Mode
- 5 MSI GS70 laptop review
Latest News Articles
- AMD will sneak-peek its high-end Zen CPU in December, starting a new CPU war
- 5 burning questions about AMD's Zen chip
- Nvidia tempts GeForce Experience 3.0 users with Gears of War 4 giveaway
- Intel's latest Xeon chips based on Skylake due next year
- Intel packs more horsepower in its monster 22-core processor
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- TV of the year award 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- CCProduct OwnerNSW
- CCUAT TesterQLD
- FT.Net & Oracle Developers - Agile, Digital/ Portal DevelopmentNSW
- FTCustomer Support/Helpdesk Support SpecialistQLD
- CCProduct Manager - Life Insurance (Fixed-Term)VIC
- CCNetwork EngineerNSW
- CCOrganisational Change Manager - Wealth ManagementNSW
- CCSenior Business AnalystACT
- FTBusiness Intelligence Technical AnalystVIC
- TPSQL/BI DeveloperNSW
- CCUI DesignerNSW
- TPSAP FICO Functional AnalystQLD
- CCIngres DeveloperQLD
- FTFront End DeveloperVIC
- FTStorage Systems Administrator l HDS & EMC TechnologiesNSW
- FTSecurity LeadWA
- CCCyber Security Analyst - TelcoVIC
- FT2nd Line Engineer - CitrixVIC
- FTService Lifecycle Management Contract AdministratorVIC
- CCSoftware TesterNSW
- CCGIS ConsultantACT
- CCCloud Solution Architect - Financial Services - Continuous IntegrationNSW
- FTPractice AdvisorVIC
- FTSenior Project Manager / Program ManagerNSW
- TPSharepoint 2013 AnalystQLD