Hewlett-Packard Australia Colour LaserJet 3800n
- Competitive Cost, Good design, Good paper handling, Fast Printing
- Some text character problems
This model's small footprint, decent paper handling, and competitive costs per page make it worth a look. And it prints text faster than its less-expensive sibling does.
Price$ 1,699.00 (AUD)
Best Deals (Selling at 3 stores)
The HP Color LaserJet 3800n looks identical to the cheaper Color LaserJet 3600n, but it has a faster processor and more memory inside. It's also a true PCL printer and supports PostScript emulation, instead of relying on your PC's processing power to print from the Windows GDI. The inclusion of a processor translates into faster text printing, but color pages actually print slower than they do from this model's sibling, the 3600n. Unless monochrome text speed is of the essence, it may be hard to justify the 3800n's price premium over the 3600n. The 3800n's vertical one-pass engine keeps the unit's physical footprint small (15.8 by 17.7 inches).
The front of the machine folds down to make changing toner cartridges easy. The full-size black and color cartridges that the 3800n ships with are rated at 6000 pages each (the 3600n uses 4000-page color cartridges). Though they're expensive, each incorporates a fresh drum unit, so that expense won't sneak up on you over time. No other parts require regular replacement, so the 3800n is easy to maintain and there are no hidden costs.
The main paper drawer holds up to 250 sheets of paper. Folding down the multipurpose tray at the front lets you stack another 100 sheets. For heavy-duty printing, you can attach an optional 500-sheet bin. HP doesn't offer a duplexer for the 3800n; to get that feature you'd have to step up to the 3800dn..
The 3800n printed pages at above-average speeds in our tests: 16.5 pages per minute for text and 5.3 ppm for color graphics. By comparison, the 3600n prints text at 13.0 ppm and color graphics a bit faster at 5.6 ppm.
The print quality for most office tasks is good. Our judges liked the sharp text but noticed a few oddly shaped characters. Large, solid letters had a dappled appearance. The line art sample came out too dark, causing closely spaced lines to merge into a solid block.
Our grayscale image achieved good tonal variations. Despite some obvious dithering patterns, the 3800n printed good-looking color graphics on plain paper. However, photographs printed on glossy paper looked unnatural, with blown-out highlights, grainy dithering patterns, and fine banding.
This model's small footprint, decent paper handling, and competitive costs per page make it worth a look and it prints text faster than its less-expensive sibling does making it worthwhile for consideration.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet (LTE) review: The tablet of choice for anyone on Android
- 2 Bose SoundLink Mini II Bluetooth speaker review
- 3 Apple MacBook Air 2015 review: Only better with time
- 4 HTC One (M8s) review: Better value for money than HTC's flagship
- 5 ZTE Blade S6 review: A dual-SIM, 4G smartphone for less than $300
Deals on PC World
- Networking, Wireless & VoIP
Deals on PC World
Latest News Articles
- HP LaserJets use a new type of toner particle that can improve energy efficiency and print speed
- Epson Australia launches its Future of Business Printing system
- da Vinci 1.0 AiO: the world’s first personal 3D scanner and printer is coming to Australia
- Hands on with MakerBot's 3D printed wood
- Hardcotton's Elemental promises easy 3D printing for under $1000
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.