Hewlett-Packard Australia Photosmart 375
- Large LCD, high speed, good print quality
- Expensive, awkward design
While this inkjet printer did produce adequate results, the cost of the unit plus the high running costs make it a very expensive proposition.
Price$ 399.00 (AUD)
This printer is tiny, and has a slightly awkward design. Its rear paper input tray opens up in a very narrow fashion to allow you to insert up to 20 sheets of paper. The spring that holds the paper in place also makes it a little hard to load an individual sheet of paper, as some force is required to get it into the tray.
The front of the unit is a little more endearing, as once the power button is pressed the paper output tray drops to reveal PictBridge and memory card slots for direct printing.
Direct printing is aided by the 2.5" LCD screen that sits atop the unit, and which allows you to browse photos on memory cards to select which ones you want to print. Browsing memory cards was very efficient, as there was virtually no noticeable access time between shots. Likewise, printing from our SD card was very quick, with prints completing in only 1 minute and 39 seconds. PictBridge prints emerged slightly slower at 1 minute and 45 seconds, while prints from the PC came out in only 1 minute and 33 seconds. If you leave too many prints in the output tray though, they may eventually end up on the floor as the next prints in the queue come out.
This printer has a tri-colour cartridge that does not have a dedicated black tank. Blacks are blended from the cyan, magenta and yellow inks. This print cartridge is easily replaced from the front of the unit and the printer driver allows you to locate replacement cartridges quickly by allowing you to click through HP's Web site. Apart from the regular tri-colour cartridge, there is an option for a grey colour cartridge. Other options for this printer include a Bluetooth module, for printing from wireless devices.
The prints from this unit were more than acceptable to our eyes and, even though it does not have a dedicated black ink tank, we found it handled black colouring in the majority of our photos very well. It also produced vibrant colour tones and displayed difficult colour gradations reasonably well. In saying that, its colour blending was still not as good as many of Epson's photo printers, and some images appeared as though they were printed a little too sharply.
A tri-colour cartridge for this printer will cost you about $43, while a 20-sheet pack of Colourfast Photo Paper will cost you a further $16. The tri-colour cartridge is stated as having a yield of around 260 prints, based on 15% coverage on a sheet of letter-sized paper. Our usage indicates that 20 photos would consume up to a fifth of this cartridge, which means you should be able to get about 100 photos out of it. If you were to purchase 100 sheets of paper along with one cartridge, then your cost per photo would end up being close to $1.07, which is comparatively very expensive. Unfortunately, HP does not supply a bundled ink and paper pack for this printer.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 2 Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- 3 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
- 4 Apple iPhone 7 Plus review: including Portrait Mode
- 5 MSI GS70 laptop review
Latest News Articles
- HP offers US$1 billion for Samsung's printer business
- How 4D printing is now saving lives
- HP begins selling its Jet Fusion 3D printer; says it's 50% cheaper, 10X faster than others
- 3D printing industry to triple in four years to $21B
- Disney files patent for near instantaneous 3D printing
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- TV of the year award 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- CCSolution Architect - PHPNSW
- CCEmail Production SpecialistQLD
- FTField EngineerVIC
- CCBusiness Analyst ( Finance/Banking)QLD
- FTSenior Insight AnalystACT
- FTService Desk AnalystNSW
- FTSystems AdministratorVIC
- FTSenior Test Analyst (HL7)VIC
- CCProject Manager- Office 365 and Core Azure servicesNSW
- FTSenior Financial Planner - GeelongVIC
- CCSenior Project EngineerNSW
- CCSecurity ConsultantWA
- CCJava DeveloperWA
- CCWindows System EngineerNSW
- FTSenior Front End DeveloperNSW
- CCBusiness and Reporting AnalystWA
- CCCX Performance & Insights AnalystNSW
- CCPerformance Test AnalystVIC
- CCIteration Manager / Scrum MasterOther
- CCSiebel DeveloperVIC
- CCHadoop DeveloperVIC
- FTNetwork Engineer / Systems Engineer (January 2017 Start)QLD
- CCInfrastructure Security SpecialistNSW
- CCProject Engineer (Microwave)SA
- FTDesktop Support EngineerNSW