Hewlett-Packard Australia Scanjet 2400
- Good image quality for the price
- Slow speed, limited resolution, basic software
A cheap and cheerful scanner that offers enough to make it a worthwhile purchase
Price$ 99.00 (AUD)
Way, way down at the bottom of Hewlett Packard's lineup of scanners sits their Scanjet 2400. This really is a bargain offering and one of the cheapest scanners on the market at present. Novices will be well served by the simplicity and low cost of this unit.
The Scanjet 2400 is an incredibly basic product, reflected through every aspect of its design. From the plain white plastic casing through to the simplistic software package, everything seems to have been created with cost in mind. The scanner's specifications are equally low end: a maximum resolution of 1200dpi and only a low speed USB 1.1 connection. However, despite these limitations, the Scanjet 2400 is still a decent product.
Setting up the scanner is incredibly simple, a matter of connecting two cables. Installing the accompanying software took a fairly long time, but seeing as this only has to be done once it's not such a problem. Two shortcut buttons are located on the front of the scanner; one for direct scanning and one for printing. Pressing these opens up HP's scanning software. This software is fairly basic, but offers enough customisation and image control to still remain satisfactory. We wouldn't recommend using the image editing functions, however, as the software made scans appear grainy with low grade colours. Even Windows Paint does a better job of displaying photos, and that's saying something. HP also includes OCR software for making scans of documents. This is also adequate, managing to faithfully replicate text on screen (though it did appear to struggle with underlined text). The lid of the 2400 can also be removed at the hinge for scanning bulky items such as books.
Of course, image quality is of primary concern when buying a scanner. The maximum resolution of 1200dpi more than adequate for scanning items no smaller than a 6x4 photograph. We tested the scanner at maximum resolution with maximum colour depth and were fairly impressed by the results. The colour reproduction was excellent, with vivid colours and good differentiation between shades. There were no clear signs of pixilation or image degradation either.
The 2400 does fall down slightly when it comes to speed, but this to be expected from a low price scanner with no high speed USB connection. A standard A4 colour page took 40 seconds at 300dpi. Compare that to 12 seconds on the best scanner we have tested, the Perfection V700 Photo and the difference quickly becomes apparent. Of course, given that scanner costs eight times as much it's hardly a surprise that it outperforms the 2400. At maximum resolution the 2400 took three minutes to scan a 6x4 photo; again a little slow.
Despite all the scanner's limitations with slow speed, low resolution and simplistic software, it performs well in two of the most important areas: image quality and price. If your budget is limited and the 2400 would make an ideal purchase.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 2 Huawei Nova Plus smartphone review
- 3 Apple iPhone 7 Plus review: including Portrait Mode
- 4 Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- 5 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
Latest News Articles
- HP shutting down default FTP, Telnet access to network printers
- Why won’t my printer connect to my wireless router?
- HP offers US$1 billion for Samsung's printer business
- How 4D printing is now saving lives
- HP begins selling its Jet Fusion 3D printer; says it's 50% cheaper, 10X faster than others
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- Time to ditch Foxtel and the iQ3: How to replace Foxtel packages with cheaper alternatives
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- CCInfrastructure Project ManagerNSW
- CCTechnical Support ConsultantVIC
- CCData Modeller and Business Analyst - Integration ProjectQLD
- FTMDM - ConsultantNSW
- FTCheckpoint Firewall and VPNNSW
- TPIDAM ArchitectVIC
- FTTest Analyst - HealthcareVIC
- FTJava DeveloperSA
- CCAccessability TesterVIC
- FTBI Tech Lead l Informatica ETL , Microstrategy, Hadoop, Qlikview, SalesforceNSW
- CCBusiness AnalystNSW
- TPFunctional Business AnalystQLD
- CCSenior Java DeveloperNSW
- TPIT Procurement OfficerQLD
- CCProject Manager - Location Management Program - TelcoVIC
- FTMicrosoft Dynamics AX Finance ConsultantACT
- TPBI Data AnalystQLD
- FTMS Exchange System Engineer l PowerShell l Message LabsNSW
- TPSQL Server DeveloperNSW
- FTJava DeveloperNSW
- FTLevel 3 EngineerNSW
- CCNetwork Security Engineer - Cisco ISEVIC
- CCNetwork EngineerACT
- FTTechnical Services Engineer - Spanish speakingNSW