IBM Australia Lotus Symphony free office suite
- Intuitive menus and toolbars, it's free
- Special effects are lost when saved as a Word .doc, lesser features than Word
IBM says that the full version 1.0 of IBM Lotus Symphony will be available in the first quarter of 2008, and it will still be free of charge. That's a good thing, as the zero price point is Lotus Symphony's best calling card. It's an efficient program with a handsome interface but with feature enhancements still to be made. While powerful, it certainly does not rival Office's robust capabilities -- yet.
Best Deals (Selling at 3 stores)
IBM's free Lotus Symphony office productivity suite does much of what Microsoft Office can do. And it costs nothing.
IBM is challenging Microsoft with a game of "anything you can do I can do". Its Lotus Symphony office suite -- now available as a public beta -- does much of what the $690+ Standard edition of Microsoft Office, only at a much better price: it's free.
Comprising of three applications -- a word processor (Lotus Symphony Documents), a spreadsheet (Lotus Symphony Spreadsheets), and a presentation creator (Lotus Symphony Presentations) -- IBM Lotus Symphony supports both Windows (XP, Vista, 2000) and Linux operating systems. (IBM says a version for the Mac OS is coming, but hasn't said when.)
Right now, on the Lotus Symphony site it suggests that the IBM Lotus Symphony suite beta requires an IBM ID, and that the user is based in the US. When we signed up for an ID (which is free) we were honest about being in Australia, and successfully downloaded, installed and ran the beta.
Each IBM Lotus Symphony application can open and save in a variety of file formats including Office (2003/XP/97; not 2007) and ODF (Open Document Format), as well as save files as PDFs.
The IBM Lotus Symphony suite is available as a free download. It requires a minimum of 540MB of hard disk space on Windows (750MB on Linux) and 512MB of RAM. In our initial tests we found that IBM Lotus Symphony launched slowly and had noticeable lags with some tasks when operating on a PC with 512MB of RAM, but it ran at a clip on a 1GB system.
IBM doesn't offer direct tech support for IBM Lotus Symphony; instead, it has set up an online user support community to which an IBM support team contributes.
Word stays at number 1. For now
Unlike Microsoft Office, which makes you launch its applications separately, the entire IBM Lotus Symphony suite opens in a single window, with a tabbed interface that integrates all three applications. The feature set and cosmetics of the three applications mirrors Lotus's Symphony office suite from the 1990s, and the look and feel will be familiar to any Office user.
Still, there are enough differences between Microsoft's suite and this one to give newcomers pause as they attempt to locate functions. But the learning curve for any user should be short, as IBM Lotus Symphony's menus and toolbars are intuitive.
Symphony Documents opened our existing Microsoft Word files with no problem. After editing the documents, we were able to save in Word's .doc format or in IBM Lotus Symphony's native OpenDocument (.odt) format. One nice touch: we saved a document with 1000 characters in both formats and found that the .odt version had a 66 per cent smaller file size (7 Kilobits vs. Word's 21Kb).
Another nice feature is called Text Boundaries, which places a thin line around the perimeter of the printable part of the document so you can actually see how the borders and margins are set up. The default page view also has a Text Properties sidebar that offers a convenient way to preview the fonts, font sizes, and special style options (such as shadow or engraved) used in the document. Unfortunately, this view wastes valuable screen real estate -- and the only other viewing option in IBM Lotus Symphony Documents is an online view that hides page breaks.
Alas, the special effects you can render in IBM Lotus Symphony Documents are lost when the file is saved as a Word .doc. And while most elements of a Word .doc are transferable to Symphony, some -- such as macros, tracking changes, and special format styles such as drop caps and shading -- are incompatible.
When we opened in Symphony a Word doc that had tracking marks, the marks were intact, but we could not accept or reject them. We were also unable to hide or delete them from the page. Similarly, when we created a file in Symphony and formatted text as a drop cap, then saved the file as a .doc and opened it in Microsoft Word, the formatting was lost.
While IBM Lotus Symphony Documents has fewer features than Word, it is still a very useful word processor that comes with enough power for most everyday needs.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Sony Xperia Z4 Tablet (LTE) review: The tablet of choice for anyone on Android
- 2 Bose SoundLink Mini II Bluetooth speaker review
- 3 Apple MacBook Air 2015 review: Only better with time
- 4 HTC One (M8s) review: Better value for money than HTC's flagship
- 5 ZTE Blade S6 review: A dual-SIM, 4G smartphone for less than $300
Deals on PC World
- Networking, Wireless & VoIP
Deals on PC World
Latest News Articles
- Vulnerability found in Samsung smartphone keyboard
- Major update coming to Netflix Australia
- Mac users exposed by zero-day vulnerability
- Free upgrade to Windows 10 for computers up to 6 years old
- Google Photos offers unlimited free cloud storage for photos and video
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.