Imation Defender F200 biometric flash drive (32GB)
A fingerprint scanner adds a higher level of security to the Imation Defender F200 flash drive
- Biometric security, doesn't come cheap
- IronKey offers better performance
Overall, the choice of Imation's Defender F200 comes down to a matter of security options over performance. If you really like the idea of a biometrics reader, the F200 makes sense. But if you're concerned with performance, the IronKey has the F200 beat hands down.
Price$ 349.00 (AUD)
Setting up the drive for use
Because I used a MacBook Pro to test this drive, the autorun feature did not automatically boot up the drive's setup window when I plugged the drive into the USB port. As the drive's manual instructed, I simply opened the drive's file system and selected the start.exe folder, and off I went. (Note: The setup window is also where you configure your administrator account and password for corporate control of multiple F200 flash drives).
The first thing the setup procedure asks for is your language (English is the default). It then asks you to personalize the drive. You can choose "standard" or "custom." By choosing "standard," you get only the biometric (fingerprint) security option, with no need for two-factor (password) authentication.
Like most good USB sticks with encryption, the Defender allows 10 password attempts before the drive permanently locks and requires a user to reformat it, wiping all data stored on it.
The default setting is for the entire drive to become one private partition, but you can also create multiple partitions. The ability to create multiple partitions on a flash drive is relatively new but by no means unique.
On the performance side, the F200 fell short. Using Simpli Software's HD Tach benchmarking software, the drive revealed an average sequential read speed of 18.6MB/sec., a burst speed of 19.8MB/sec., a random access time of 0.8 milliseconds and a CPU utilization rate of 9%.
I then tested it with the ATTO Disk Benchmark software. This freeware provides you with both read and write speeds. The drive's read speed again peaked at 18.4MB/sec. Its write speed peaked at 8.1MB/sec.
I compared it against the IronKey Secure Flash Drive, which Computerworld reviewed a couple of years ago. The IronKey is also FIPS Level 3-validated, and has anti-malware and remote administrative control features.
HD Tach showed that the IronKey had a burst speed of 31MB/sec., an average read rate of 29.6MB/sec. and a 6-millisecond random access rate. In other words, the IronKey is almost twice as fast as the F200. (The IronKey's CPU utilization rate was also, at 22%, vastly higher than any other drive we tested.)
When it comes to pricing, Imation's Defender F200 seems high, but you have to remember that you're paying for an extremely secure device.
The drive comes in capacities ranging from 1GB for a suggested retail price of US$99 to 32GB for $349. As of this writing, it was only available to resellers, but it should be on the general market soon.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Sony Xperia Z5 Premium review: Is the world ready for a 4K phone?
- 2 D-Link Taipan AC3200 Ultra tri-band modem-router review
- 3 Dell XPS 13 (2016) review: Making the very best Ultrabook
- 4 Microsoft Surface Book review: The verdict on Microsoft's first notebook
- 5 Telstra Wi-Fi 4GX Advanced III review: Testing the world's first 600Mbps wireless hotspot
Best Deals on PC World
Latest News Articles
- Rolling blog: Industry reacts to Budget 2016
- Budget 2016: A "missed opportunity" for startups
- Aussie start-up, Rundl, hits $5bn transaction milestone
- Uber faces more lawsuits for classifying drivers as contractors
- Michael Dell talks to EMC World about massive merger
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- CCContract Systems Analyst (.Net/JAVA/Oracle) 160504/SA/vtdAsia
- CCJava Developer / DevOps | FINEOS Application | Long Term ContractNSW
- FTDeveloper - OSB/BPELNSW
- CCL3 - Network Design and Support EngineerNSW
- CCSenior Enterprise Architect - eCommerceVIC
- CCCommunication and Change ManagerVIC
- FTTechnical/Team Lead - .NetNSW
- CCInstructional DesignerQLD
- CCCommVault Backp EngineerNSW
- CCWeb AdministratorACT
- FTSolution ArchitectVIC
- CCContract Programmer (Crystal Report/HTML/SQL) 160428/P/244Asia
- CCProject ManagerQLD
- FTApplication Manager | Telco IndustryVIC
- FTSolution Delivery Manager ( RTTM)NSW
- CCBusiness Project ManagerAsia
- FTManager; Enterprise ArchitectureNSW
- CCIntegration Delivery Project ManagerNSW
- CCHyperion ConsultantNSW
- CCAWS ArchitectNSW
- CCMid or Senior Developer - Mobile Applications - (iOS)NSW
- CCSenior Master Data OfficerNSW
- FTProduct Owner - MarketingNSW
- FTBusiness Intelligence ConsultantSA
- CCSenior Technical WriterVIC