- Easy set up, Fast printing
- Printing thick media is tedious, expensive per page.
The eye-catching Lexmark E240n lets you print good-looking text (but dark graphics) easily from anywhere on your network.
Price$ 349.00 (AUD)
Buy now (Selling at 1 store)
The compact black Lexmark E240n has the same angular design as the company's E232 and E330 models. This unit adds networking through its built-in ethernet port. Like the older printers, the E240n has the same simple two-button, five-LED control panel, so there's no LCD-based menu system for entering the network settings, but installation turned out to be surprisingly quick and simple.
The E240n handles paper just as its siblings do. The tray in the printer's base holds up to 250 sheets of paper, with legal size paper the largest it can accommodate. The tray extends out from the back of the printer, where a removable cover protects it from dust. Up to 150 pages collect facedown in the bin on top of the printer.
Because you have to feed thicker media individually through the E240n's manual bypass slot, printing more than a few envelopes at a time can become tedious. Fortunately, you can reduce the chance of jamming by folding down the rear paper exit to establish a flatter path through the printer. If you do lots of printing, or if you frequently switch between different types of paper, for an extra cost you can add a second paper drawer that holds another 550 sheets.
Lexmark rates the capacity of the starter toner cartridge that comes in the box as sufficient for just 1500 pages. The company offers the same 2500-page replacement cartridges as for its other printers, but not the E330's more economical units rated at 6000 pages. When you include the cost of replacing the drum assembly every 30,000 pages, your cost per page becomes around 4.4 cents, which is relatively steep compared to similar printers that can accept higher-capacity cartridges. Replacing the toner is relatively simple, but you have to hold down an extra button to withdraw the cartridge from the drum assembly.
Despite having a faster processor, the E240n prints slightly slower than the E330 (but significantly quicker than the E232). Our test center timed text pages emerging at a still-rapid 19.9 pages per minute, while graphics pages were closer to average at 8.2 ppm.
The E240n's text printing showed a marked improvement over that of its siblings in our quality tests. Most characters looked sharp and nicely formed, despite the heavy-set type and the mottled appearance of solid areas when seen under artificial lighting. Our line art sample seemed a bit dark, and some of the blocks of closely spaced lines looked gritty, but banding was barely visible. Unfortunately, the E240n couldn't match these results in our grayscale image test, which came out far too dark.
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 HTC One Mini 2 android smartphone
- 2 Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Windows 8.1 tablet
- 3 Medion Akoya E4110 (MD 8239) desktop PC
- 4 Samsung Galaxy Tab S (10.5) 4G review
- 5 Dell Inspiron 11 3000 Series convertible laptop
Best Deals on GoodGearGuide
Latest News Articles
- iPhone 6 expected to fetch over $3,000 in China's grey market
- New US Senate bill aims to limit access to emails stored abroad
- Malicious advertisements distributed by DoubleClick, Zedo networks
- Apple iPhone 6 hands-on
- Google to turn on encryption by default in next Android version
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.