Lexmark X2470

  • Review
  • Specs
  • Images
  • User Reviews
  • Buy Now 5
Lexmark X2470

Pros

  • Low initial cost, One-touch buttons make it very user-friendly

Cons

  • Slow, single ink cartridge, barely adequate print quality

Bottom Line

The X2470 is cheap on paper, but its running costs will stack up in the long run. Add to this the average speed and final quality that fails to match that of similar models and you have an MFD that may struggle to establish itself.

Would you buy this?

  • Buy now (Selling at 5 stores)

See all prices

We've become used to printers replacing the universal colour cartridge with individual tanks, allowing you to replace one tank rather than having to junk the entire cartridge.

The X2470, however, goes for the opposite philosophy: you don't even get individual colour and black versions. Everything is built into a single cartridge and, because this is so small, you can expect to be replacing it frequently. This is because the cartridge uses cyan, magenta and yellow to produce blacks -- it doesn't have any black ink in it. Rated at 165 pages, and costing around $30, the print cartridge for this unit will print documents for around 18 cents per page.

Of course, 160 pages out of a single cartridge is a best case scenario. Depending on how much ink your printouts use, the cartridge will run out much more quickly.

In most other respects, though, the X2470 is a solid, if uninspired, MFD (multifunction device). The one-touch buttons make it a very user-friendly device and the inclusion of a PictBridge port is a good addition. The print resolutions are very much the standard for sub-$100 MFDs as is the 100-page input tray.

We weren't too impressed by the speeds, but for the price, you shouldn't expect a speed demon. You'll need to be satisfied with just 1.7ppm for decent quality colour prints. Even its highest quality mode was no more than adequate.

Neither was the Lexmark particularly impressive at text. Even at the top setting characters were thick and lacked finesse. Scanning facilities were adequate given the price, but the low optical scanning resolution means that such features are always going to be rather limited.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Be the first to comment.

Post new comment

Users posting comments agree to the PC World comments policy.

Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?