Lexmark X4650

An average family multifunction

  • Review
  • Specs
  • Images
  • User Reviews
  • Buy Now 5
Lexmark X4650
  • Lexmark X4650
  • Lexmark X4650
  • Lexmark X4650

Pros

  • Wi-Fi connectivity, adequate print quality

Cons

  • Slow printing speeds, overly light scans

Bottom Line

For the average family, the X4650 should suffice. Wi-Fi connectivity is an advantage for shared printing and print quality is adequate, but poor printing speeds will deter many people.

Would you buy this?

  • Buy now (Selling at 5 stores)

See all prices

The X4650 is Lexmark's mid-range multifunction. It's a basic unit built and priced for home printing. The unit's Wi-Fi connectivity is it's only real distinguishing point; otherwise, it doesn't offer anything fantastic as either a printer or scanner.

Connectivity is by way of either USB 2.0 or Wi-Fi. Wireless connections can either be a direct ad-hoc connection to computer or to an established network. This function is common in Lexmark's range, but it is a good feature to find in a multifunction at this price point.

The X4650's card reader supports SD, xD, MMC, Memory Stick, CompactFlash and MicroDrive, as well as a PictBridge port for direct printing. As the multifunction only has a monochrome LCD, it relies on proof sheets or preset photo numbers for direct photo printing from memory cards. Unfortunately, there's no way of simply viewing photo file names; however, the other options are sufficient for basic photo printing. The PictBridge port also supports standard USB flash drives, allowing users to save photos on a memory card directly to a USB flash drive.

Printing speed is roughly on par with the multifunction's Professional series counterpart, the X4875. Standard text documents print at an average of 14.3 pages per minute at draft quality; this slows to 6.8ppm at normal quality. This isn't too bad. However, colour printing speeds were less than impressive: 9.23ppm at normal quality and a paltry 2ppm using normal quality settings. Standard 4x6in photos will print in roughly 50sec; A4 photos print in 2min 30sec, a marked improvement over the X4875. Given this multifunction is targeted at families and students, document printing speeds are adequate, although colour printing is horribly slow.

Print quality is adequate, but not outstanding. Text documents are clean and tidy, but don't possess the laser-like quality of some competing units. Text can become slightly ragged when combined with graphical elements and text highlights, but background colours are largely consistent. We were surprised with the quality of photo printing. Although colours are often harsh and over-exaggerated, vertical banding is largely invisible — a feat uncommon in printers at this price point. Blacks are adequately defined in darker photos, but reds and yellows are highly saturated.

Scanned images are, for the most part, overly light. This doesn't affect text, but flesh tones in photos are under-saturated, leading to a loss of detail in lighter pictures. At 600dpi, scans are accurate, but the overexposure of scanned images can easily result in lost quality.

The X4650 will cost 15.4c per page when conducting average printing. This is reasonable but not the cheapest we've seen.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Be the first to comment.

Post new comment

Users posting comments agree to the PC World comments policy.

Login or register to link comments to your user profile, or you may also post a comment without being logged in.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?