- Low price, built-in fax and automatic document feed
- Slow photo printing, mediocre overall print quality
If you need a cheap combination of printer, scanner, fax, and copier for a home office in which speed and quality are of no concern, the Lexmark X5470 could be a good choice. But if you need to make a good impression, consider spending a little more money.
Price$ 249.00 (AUD)
Lexmark's budget multi-function device includes a fax and an automatic document feeder.
The Lexmark X5470 cuts some corners to achieve its exceptionally low $249 price tag, but it still packs a remarkable set of features for the money. It has a 33.6Kbps colour fax capability and an automatic document feeder that can take 10 pages at a time. The glass platen allows flatbed scans up to letter-size, but you can feed legal-size paper through the automatic document feeder.
The control panel lacks a colour screen, instead sporting a less-expensive backlit two-line monochrome LCD. The buttons, which Lexmark has arranged logically enough around the LCD, include a numeric pad for fax dialling. The two media slots accept most digital camera memory cards, but you have no way to preview images without a colour LCD. If you plan to work mostly from your PC, however, the lack of a colour LCD is largely irrelevant. However, you can print a proof sheet, mark which images to print, and run it through the scanner. Image-enhancement options include red-eye removal and colour effects. The PictBridge port lets you print directly from your digital camera. You can also print from a USB flash drive plugged into the PictBridge port; Lexmark doesn't offer a Bluetooth adapter.
The unit's single upright paper feeder at the rear holds up to 100 sheets. No paper-handling upgrades are available. Out of the box the X5470 uses four inks in two cartridges, including a pigment-based black ink for text printing. You can replace the black cartridge with one containing pigment-based light cyan, light magenta, and black inks for six-ink printing on photo paper.
In our print-quality tests using the standard cartridges, text printed darkly, but characters could have been crisper and we saw much horizontal banding. Line art suffered from fuzzy lines, gritty textures in closely spaced blocks, and some narrow banding. Photos that were printed with four inks on plain paper looked atrocious -- a combination of overly visible dithering, fuzzy details, banding and posterisation effects. However, glossy photos that were printed using all six inks looked much better, if slightly grainy. They fell short of the best quality we saw from competing MFDs, though. Scan quality also was below par, but as a copier the X5470 did a decent job for an inkjet.
Against the stopwatch text printed relatively quickly, at 9.8 pages per minute (ppm). Plain-paper graphics arrived much more slowly, at 2.1ppm; whereas on glossy letter-size paper, our sample photo trickled out in 94 seconds. A 100dpi scan of our 4x5in test image emerged after a slow 10.2 seconds; photocopies averaged a tedious 1.9ppm.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 2 Huawei Nova Plus smartphone review
- 3 Apple iPhone 7 Plus review: including Portrait Mode
- 4 Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- 5 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
Latest News Articles
- Samsung's UHD Monitor covers 99.5 per cent of Adobe colour spectrum
- HP settles cases with inkjet cartridge vendors
- Study predicts PS3 will win the console war
- Samsung wave makes a splash at Mobile World Congress
- Sony returns to profit, cuts full-year loss forecast
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- Time to ditch Foxtel and the iQ3: How to replace Foxtel packages with cheaper alternatives
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- FTBrand Marketing Manager - Premium Entertainment BrandNSW
- CCSenior Project Manager - Financial Planning - Contract - Sydney CBDNSW
- TPProject Manager - Data ManagementSA
- TPAndroid DeveloperSA
- CCCapacity and Performance Analyst - Mainframe - Z SystemsVIC
- CCSAP HR/ Payroll Support ConsultantNSW
- CCSCRUM MasterVIC
- CCIntegration Systems SpecialistQLD
- CCProject/ Operational CoordinatorNSW
- FTManager Integration PlanningNSW
- FTLinux EngineerNSW
- FTNational Manager of Security - We are looking for a strong Leader - Syd CBDNSW
- FTSecurity System EngineerSA
- FTJnr Security SOC Analyst (Tier 1) - Permanent - North Ryde BasedNSW
- TPTest ManagerQLD
- CCSenior PMO Analyst - ReportingNSW
- FTInformation Security ManagerNSW
- FTTechnical Content CoordinatorVIC
- CCService ManagerACT
- CCProject ManagerNSW
- FTMicrosoft Dynamics AX Finance ConsultantNSW
- CCIntegration DeveloperNSW
- FTTechnology Testing Services ManagerVIC
- FTMicrosoft Dynamics AX Finance ConsultantVIC
- CCSenior Developer - Appian/PegaVIC