Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary
Halo's remake hasn’t done much to push the envelope, but it’s a good stop-gap filler
- It’s a classic game, remade very competently
- Enough with this FPS formula, already.
It’s possibly the least spectacular Halo release to date, but it’s proof that Microsoft can handle this franchise without Bungie.
Price$ 59.00 (AUD)
The original Halo is a game we can simultaneously praise and hate. A real pioneer of the FPS genre, a lot of what we see in the thousands of FPSers released on a weekly basis have cribbed many of their ideas from trends Halo set in motion.
Indeed, while Halo itself might have just capitalised on a few of the ideas that were emerging from the likes of Call of Duty, it went a long way to popularising them.
For obvious reasons, the remake hasn’t done nearly as much to push the envelope, but it’s a good stop-gap filler while fans wait for the true new Halo game to be released next year.
It looks the part of a modern game — the visual aesthetic of Halo: Combat Evolved was superb back in the days of the original Xbox, and with a HD coat it really develops that big-budget, space opera atmosphere. Planets look suitably alien, enemies run around with a great fluidity, guns flash with the usual science fiction rainbows of colour. The only disappointment is in the facial animations during dialogue and cut scenes. That part is plastic and stiff, a remnant of the past that most modern remakes struggle with.
The game itself plays out much like the Halo we know and have played a million times since — run down a corridor (whether in a spaceship or the usual FPS artificial corridors of mountains, trees and invisible walls). Every so often you’ll run into a swarm of enemies. Kill them. Run down the corridor a bit more and kick off a cutscene.
Every so often you’ll have a vehicle section to “enjoy” (the Warthog could still use some control tweaking). And then eventually, after the explosions can’t get any bigger, it’s game over.
To be brutally honest I am thoroughly sick of this formula. Yes, Halo does it really well, and yes, it’s a formula that enough people seem to enjoy to make the FPS the dominant genre of the industry right now. After a few hundred of these games, though, it’s a formula that’s getting about as tired as playing the duck shooting gallery at a carnival a thousand times.
But then to many, that single player game is hardly the point of Halo. The multiplayer is where it’s at, and here’s an opportunity to play some really classic maps online, perhaps for the first time. Halo’s multiplayer maps are generally a balanced bunch and personally this game is a touch more accessible in multiplayer than, say, Call of Duty or Battlefield. You’ll still have to deal with the irritating children who have only just discovered how cool it is to swear, but at least the game itself won’t be so uncomfortable.
Ultimately Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary is just a stop-gap. Microsoft needed to have something to tide fans over until Halo 4, and this does a reasonable job. The game itself is showing its age a touch, and does very little to advance a genre that is rapidly approaching stagnation. Those who have fond memories of the original game, and Halo fans who might have missed out on the original, should get a kick out of this.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Samsung Galaxy Note 7 review
- 2 Portable power: Venom Blackbook 13 Zero review
- 3 Alcatel Idol 4S review: King of the mid-range?
- 4 Witness a 241% Australian price hike: Dell Latitude 7370 review
- 5 Is this the best value phone on the market? Moto G4 Plus review
Latest News Articles
- Divinity: Original Sin II preview: Choose your own reactive, gloriously chaotic adventure
- South Park: The Fractured But Whole preview: With great farts come great responsibility
- Konami's Metal Gear Survive is a co-op zombie survival game
- Microsoft wants all your devices to run on Xbox One’s proprietary wireless signal
- Warning: No Man’s Sky's PC port is broken and buggy
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- FTMiddleware - DevOps EngineerVIC
- CCPMO AnalystNSW
- CCSenior Project Manager - Contact CentresNSW
- CCAsset Transfer Specialist | TelecommunicationVIC
- CCContract Systems Analyst (Windows 7/8/10) 160901/SA/212Asia
- CCSenior Technical Specialist - Active DirectoryVIC
- FTOrchestration Engineer - DevOps - PuppetVIC
- CCEmail Production SpecialistNSW
- CCProject Manager (Application Dev. & Mgt.) 160906/PM/472Asia
- CCiOS DeveloperVIC
- CCContract Systems Analyst (CISCO/Firewall/Network) 160819/SA/423Asia
- CCSystem Analyst - NetIQNSW
- FTClient Engagement ManagerVIC
- CCEnterprise ArchitectNSW
- CCFunctional & System Integration Test AnalystACT
- CCProject ManagerACT
- CCContract Analyst Programmer (Crystal Report/JAVA) 160816/AP/vhsAsia
- CCContract Programmer (JAVA/J2EE) 160901/P/601Asia
- CCIT Program Manager - TelecommunicationsNSW
- FTWeb Analytics SpecialistNSW
- CCNetwork Engineer - TelecomVIC
- FTSenior Full Stack .Net DeveloperNSW
- FTBack End Developer - Java, Spring, RESTNSW
- FTBusiness Development ManagerVIC
- CCQuality AnalystNSW