Monster iSport Victory in-ear headphones
These in-ear headphones are designed to stay in place while you exercise
- Snug fit and limited movement, particularly when running
- Plenty of bass and clear treble sounds
- Nicely-constructed carry pouch
- Some users might find them uncomfortable
There are much cheaper in-ear headphones that deliver the same quality sound. Nevertheless, the Monster iSport Victory sit quite well in the ear and perform well in all conditions.
Price$ 189.00 (AUD)
Perhaps one of the biggest issues for runners — who are sometimes forced to run alone with only music for company — is the constant need to adjust in-ear headphones while moving. It’s frustrating and takes away from the experience. Many models never seem to fit quite right.
Without other runners to talk to while you’re pounding the pavement or the treadmill at the gym, a good pair of headphones with decent bass that don’t wriggle around at high speed, can be a good motivator. And you need in-ear headphones to avoid looking like a total dill.
Next month, Monster will make available its range of iSport in-ear headphones, touted as "the athlete’s headphones". We road-tested the iSport Victory series, which have a useful design that hooks the headphones on the front inside rather than over the back of the ear.
After the initial shock of feeling like someone is prodding your ear canal with the end of a cotton swab, the headphones actually fit quite snugly. However, the feeling that you have something stuck in your ears (it can sometimes feel that way), might be a problem for some users.
The headphones stayed exactly where they were supposed to during an 8km road run, even when dealing with moderate crosswinds across the Sydney Harbour Bridge. They even managed to stay reasonably snug when it started to rain, and small droplets of water didn’t affect performance.
Used with a 2GB Apple iPod Shuffle, they delivered the kind of sound that you would expect from a relatively expensive pair of in-ear headphones.
The headphones ship with silicone sleeves (which go over the speakers) in several different sizes, enabling users to achieve the best fit for their ear size.
There’s also a remote on the cord to change tracks and volume levels, as well as a nicely-constructed pouch to store the headphones when they’re not in use. This pouch is a great addition as it keeps the headphones secure and goes a long way towards preventing them from being tangled or even destroyed in a gym bag.
At $189 RRP, the Monster iSport Victory headphones are expensive, significantly more than comparable $99 Apple in-Ear iPod headphones. However, Monster does offer less expensive models in the range with the iSport Strive ($99 RRP) and iSport Intensity ($129 RRP).
We’ve also used the Apple EarPod with Remote and Mic, which deliver a similar sound to the Monster iSport Victory; those Apple headphones retail for only $35.
Monster makes a point of telling potential buyers that the iSport range "seal in 100% of all music while simultaneously allowing any ambient noise to be heard". This apparently offers athletes a new level of road safety. In reality, using headphones while running in the vicinity of traffic (large metal vehicles moving at speed rather than soft humans), carries a level of risk. No amount of headphone technology is going to make it any safer.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 2 Huawei Nova Plus smartphone review
- 3 Apple iPhone 7 Plus review: including Portrait Mode
- 4 Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- 5 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
Latest News Articles
- Apple's AirPods could deliver audio with multiple wireless protocols
- First look: Nuheara IQbuds smart Bluetooth ear buds do more than just music
- Convoy International restructures business focus
- Beats Solo2 headphones go wireless for $399
- Astro A38 review: A staggering price to pay for convenience
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- FTBrand Marketing Manager - Premium Entertainment BrandNSW
- FTOffice365 Solution SpecialistSA
- CCIntegration Systems SpecialistNSW
- FTLevel 2 Service DeskNSW
- FTFull stack Developer - Senior (Java or C# and AngularJS) x 3QLD
- FTLead Software Engineer - JavaQLD
- TPProgram ManagerNSW
- CCSenior Project Manager - Vendor Transition - ApplicationsNSW
- FTMicrosoft Dynamics AX Finance ConsultantNSW
- CCFIS Connex Developer (Brisbane Based)SA
- CCProject DirectorVIC
- FTTechnical Account ManagerNSW
- FTChief ArchitectVIC
- CCTest Specialist - NetworkVIC
- TPLearning/Instructional DesignerQLD
- FTNetIQ Development & SupportNSW
- CCSenior C++ Software EngineerACT
- TPSenior Business Analyst - Travel and Expense Management SystemQLD
- FTIdentity Access + Security ConsultantSA
- TPAnsarada Data Room AdministratorNSW
- CCProject/ Operational CoordinatorNSW
- FTInfrastructure Solution ArchitectSA
- CCProject ManagerNSW
- TPSharePoint SpecialistVIC
- FTSenior AEM Consultant - Public SectorACT