Motorola Moto E (2nd Gen) review
A great first phone, but it is priced too high in Australia
- 4G and Dual-SIM
- Light version of Android Lollipop
- Quad-core CPU
- Priced to compete against better equipped rivals
- Camera struggles in most lighting conditions
Price$ 249.00 (AUD)
We are well into the age where a child’s first mobile can be a smartphone. Motorola makes a good case that its Moto E is the right phone for your kids, with it striking a balance between affordability and a promising set of features.
The design echoes Motorola’s modern identity. A black front is used to blend thick bezels in with the screen, while a solitary grille conceals a front firing speaker. On its back is the familiar Motorola dimple and a stylised camera lens making do without an LED flash.
Deviating from the norm is a removable cover where only the outline peels off, taking with it the volume and power buttons, but leaving the entire back in place. Propping it off is how you gain access to two 4G SIM trays and a microSD slot.
It’s the shape and the thickness of the smartphone that is telling of its low asking price. Less subtle curves turn into prominent bulges. At its thickest point, the Moto E measures 12mm, and that’s a lot of fat for such a stout smartphone.
Then there’s the quality of its display. It’s smaller than most at 4.5-inches and it has a lower resolution at 960x540. The numbers alone aren’t impressive, but colours are decent, viewing angles are wide and it’ll support Motorola’s notification screen with blacks that are wholesome. Watching videos or playing games on the Moto E is enjoyable for a smartphone in its price range.
A year’s time has resulted in some improvements to the hardware. Powering it is a 1.2GHz quad-core CPU from Qualcomm, 1GB of RAM and 8GB of internal storage. This modest hardware is just enough to keep it running along smoothly. Performing a 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited test returned a score of 4538, which is significantly lower than the 7523 achieved by the Kogan Agora 4G Pro and the 8680 scored by the ZTE Blade S6.
Hampering this smartphone is its limited memory. Most of its internal storage is filled by the Android 5.0 operating system and any applications that are installed. A microSD card makes it possible to expand it further, but only by 32GB. Snubbing support for cards larger in size is another concession made for that lower price.
Integrated into the body is a 2390 milliamp-hour battery. We used the smartphone with two 4G SIM cards and found the battery life would last an average 25 hours before needing to be recharged.
A feather in the Moto E’s proverbial cap is its support for two SIM cards, with each one operating on a 4G network. Thrifty shoppers interested in keeping their monthly spend to a minimum can milk the data benefits of one SIM card and take advantage of the free calls from the other. This is a trick mastered by high school teenagers.
Younger children confined to homes will probably resort to surfing the Internet over Wi-Fi. The Moto E will oblige with support for single-band 802.11n networks. Rounding off its connectivity technologies is low energy Bluetooth 4.0.
For many, the Moto E will not only be their first smartphone, but also their first camera. It will capture 5-megapixel stills and record high definition videos; most of which will underwhelm.
Usable photos need to be taken outside, under the generous lighting of the sun. A photo of the Sydney Harbour Bridge looked usable under such conditions, with the bright blue sky clashing against the near-black water. The quality was good enough to upload to Facebook for viewing later on the screen of a computer.
But there is a wide variety of lighting scenarios that will baffle the camera. It’ll often struggle to balance the foreground with the background, over exposing one at the expense of the other, softening its focus so that fine details are lost. Photos taken inside are worse off still as any artificial lighting will be over exposed. Dark colours are darkened and light ones are washed out altogether.
By far the biggest problem plaguing the Moto E is its price. It retails for $249 in Australia — that’s $70 more than the original. Pricing it so high puts it in the company of the Moto G, which for $20 more, offers a better design, a richer screen and better cameras. Odds are anyone who buys the 4.5-inch Moto E will have to upgrade it much sooner, too.
Join the PC World newsletter!
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 2 Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- 3 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
- 4 Apple iPhone 7 Plus review: including Portrait Mode
- 5 MSI GS70 laptop review
Latest News Articles
- Google releases Android 7.1.1 images for Pixel and Nexus devices
- Lenovo promises 12 new Moto Mod add-ons per year
- The Samsung Galaxy Note7's extreme thinness may be behind battery explosions
- Random iPhone 6s shutdowns due to faulty battery component, Apple says
- What happens when you send a text message to a landline telephone?
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- Best phone of the year 2016
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- CCTest Manager (HP Quality Centre / Kronos)NSW
- TPDevelopers and TestersACT
- FTBusiness Intelligence Technical AnalystVIC
- CCSenior Software Engineer/ DeveloperSA
- TPSenior Project ManagerNSW
- CCWeb DesignerNSW
- CCHadoop DeveloperVIC
- CCTest Lead : Perth BasedQLD
- CCTest Lead : Perth BasedSA
- FTEnd Point Security AdministratorACT
- CCSenior Java Developer | WebNSW
- CCSenior Front End DeveloperOther
- CCPlatform Services EngineerNSW
- FTSenior Project Manager - Large Site relocation projectNSW
- FT.NET DEVELOPER | MID-SENIOR LEVEL | MEDIA INDUSTRYNSW
- CCBusiness Analyst - BI, DataNSW
- TPNetwork AdministratorWA
- CCPMO CoordinatorNSW
- FTILSP ManagerNSW
- TPSenior Change ManagerNSW
- CCTest Lead : Perth BasedNSW
- CCSenior Integration DeveloperSA
- FTMarketing and Customer AnalyticsSA
- CCBusiness Analyst **FIFO TO MONGOLIA**QLD
- FTIT Systems AnalystVIC