Junk,must be restarted every few hours!
Netgear Wireless N 300 WNR2000 wireless router
For under $100, this Netgear wireless router offers good speed and useful features
- Good Wi-Fi speed; excellent range; keyword filtering works well
- Wireless speed was sometimes unreliable, requiring a restart; LEDs are too bright
The Netgear Wireless N 300 WNR2000 is a good value wireless router for anyone who wants to stream videos and distribute a fast Internet connection in a small home or apartment. We did have some issues with the reliability of its wireless speed, but for the most part the router performed very well at short and long distances.
Price$ 99.00 (AUD)
The Netgear Wireless N 300 WNR2000 is a useful wireless router for distributing a fast broadband connection and it offers very good value. You can use it to share an ADSL2+ or a cable connection wirelessly via its 802.11n (300 megabits per second) access point or by using its 4-port, 10/100 Ethernet switch. It looks stylish, has plenty of features, and, like most Netgear routers, its range is excellent.
It's a stylish router with a glossy exterior and it doesn't have external antennas. You can't wall-mount it or sit it flat on a desk — it's designed to sit upright on a table. We're not fans of its LED indicators: they are very bright and the light from one indicator can bleed into an adjacent one. The front of the router has a button for WPS (Wi-Fi Protected Setup), while the rear has an on/off button, four Ethernet ports and one WAN port.
Installing the Netgear Wireless N 300 WNR2000 is relatively easy using the supplied CD-ROM, which guides you through physical connections in addition to choosing Internet and wireless networking settings. You can go through the router's Web interface (located at 10.0.0.1) instead if you know what you're doing. Our only quibbles with the Web interface are that it checks for a firmware update as soon as you log in (if you're not connected to the Internet), some changes take a few seconds to take effect, and the Setup Wizard is very unintuitive. Apart from that though, the interface is standard for a Netgear router (the design hasn't changed in years) and it has all the usual settings for port forwarding, filtering content, enabling QoS and monitoring traffic. In fact, it's a well-featured router for home use.
Because the Wireless N 300 doesn't have a built-in modem, you have to attach your own modem to its WAN port; we used the Billion BiPAC 5200S RD. The modem performed just as we expected it to through the Netgear router: using PC World's Broadband Speed Test, our iiNet ADSL2+ connection recorded average download speeds of 16.7 megabits per second (or 16,776 kilobits per second) and average upload speeds of 861Kbps.
For sharing files or streaming media across a local network, the Wireless N 300 will generally be swift, but we did notice some inconsistency in the router's performance. Wireless performance was often sluggish, giving us almost half of the bandwidth that we expected; this was the case whether we used the default 150Mbps speed or the faster 300Mbps speed. We could get around this by restarting the router, and, luckily, the Netgear Wireless N 300 WNR2000 is one of the few routers that has a physical on/off button, which means we didn't have to pull the plug or log in to the Web interface to restart it.
When it worked well, the Wireless N 300 provided us with wireless transfer speeds of 5.36 megabytes per second (MBps) both from our close range (2m) and mid-range (10m) distances. That's one of the good aspects of the Netgear's performance: it was capable of delivering relatively quick speeds over long distances. We managed to get a usable wireless signal over 30m away from the router, but this will vary in your own environment depending on the make-up of the walls and how many electrical appliances are in between the router and the receiving computer. Basically, it's a good router for a small home or an apartment.
That said, its mid-range wireless speed is not as fast as what the similarly priced D-Link DIR-600 router achieved in the same test (7.36MBps). However, the Netgear router performed much better over longer distances in our test environment. You could definitely use the Wireless N 300 WNR2000 for streaming videos from a PC in a bedroom to a TV in the lounge room.
Parents can take advantage of the router's built-in filtering options, which allow you to block content based on keywords. When a flagged keyword is entered, the user is met with a large notice telling them they are trying to access blocked content. A log can be set up to keep track of access attempts. You can also set up the router so that it e-mails you logs of all incoming activity, too, which can be handy for seeing if anyone is trying to scan your Internet ports and gain access to your router. (If you use BitTorrent, then you will end up with a barrage of reports in your inbox.)
Port forwarding is relatively simple to set up and the router also has an option for placing a PC in a 'DMZ'. There is a QoS function, so that you can prioritise voice or gaming traffic over Web traffic, for example, and there is a built-in firewall. All up, for a retail price of $99 (and a street price that's much lower), the Netgear Wireless N 300 WNR2000 is definitely good value. It's perhaps one of the best wireless routers on the market for under $100, although we did have to restart it a few times to get the best out of it.
Become a fan of PC World Australia on Facebook
Follow PC World Australia on Twitter: @PCWorldAu
Stay up to date with the latest news, reviews and features. Sign up to PC World’s newsletters
This router is a piece of crap. It slows down when I set it in the mix mode (under 4mbps). It's even slower than my 7 years old wireless router. Therefore, it dropped speed sometimes when I streamed youtube videos.
I am ready to set it back on my old router and return it back to walmart.
Bought this thing second hand and it runs constant.
Only thing I have to figure out is how to use 802.11n mode.
Biggest piece of crap. Total waste of money. God forbid it rains, forget it. My computers are fine, but the router works when it feels like it, which is usually not often.
My internet speed is usually 100mbit down 5mbit up.
This router works but only for few hours. Then The internet download speed drops down to about 20mbit - After I restart the router the speed is 100mbit again.
This is a piece of shit. I would not recommend this to anyone. Not event if it was free.
- Works just fine the first 2 months
- What a freaking waste of money
- • • •
Basically, try a different company. Any company but this one. And they charge you an arm, a leg and a kidney just to call and ask a simple question. For that, I could take that same money and just buy another router. Piece of crap works when and if it feels like it. Don't waste your money like I did.
- just bought mine and quick setup - and backup the setting for quick restore.
- initial had to reset a few times.
- • • •
N300 could be a number of not good models out there, this one seem ok, going to keep receipt if need to return...
- set it and forget it
- • • •
I've had this router for a couple of years and it's been great. I use it as a g/n and it just works. I just updated the firmware after forgetting about it for a really long time. I can't explain why others have trouble with this router because mine works just fine.
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Microsoft Surface Pro 3 Windows 8.1 tablet
- 2 Medion Akoya E4110 (MD 8239) desktop PC
- 3 Samsung Galaxy Tab S (10.5) 4G review
- 4 Dell Inspiron 11 3000 Series convertible laptop
- 5 Kogan Agora 4G review
Best Deals on GoodGearGuide
Latest News Articles
- Bose SoundTouch 30 Wi-Fi system
- HTC launches 4.5in One Mini 2 ahead of Apple event
- HP Chromebook 11 (NB-11-2001TU_05)
- IBM Watson cooks up some new dishes
- Apple will keep pushing for a sales ban on Samsung products
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.